41. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE Flashcards
(41 cards)
- What are the Levels of Evidence based on?
- they are based on the Oxford Center for Evidence
based Medicine (2009) - there is no gold standard rule on the levels of evidence
- they are changed and revised over time
- other organisations have slightly different levels
- What are the Levels?
1a
1b
1c
2a
2b
3a
3b
4
5
NB:
- the strongest and most reliable studies are the at the
top of the list
- What is the type of study related with:
Evidence Level 1a?
- Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
- of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT)
- What are the strengths related with:
Evidence Level 1a?
- IT IS AN INTERVENTIONAL STUDY
- this means that the exposure is assigned to the
participants
- the exposure is not assessed - IT HAS HIGH INTERNAL VALIDITY
- very low Random Error
- very low Bias and Confounding
- IT HAS HIGH EXTERNAL VALIDITY
- this is assuming that the samples are representative
- and that there are no drop outs
- IT CAN PROVE TEMPORALITY IS ASSOCIATIONS
- IT IS THE STRONGEST EVIDENCE
- that proves that an exposure causes an outcome
- What are the Limitations related with:
Evidence Level 1a?
- IT DEPENDS ON THE QUALITY OF THE INCLUDED
STUDIES
- if the original studies are poorly conducted
- this cannot be fixed
- What is the type of study related with:
Evidence Level 1b?
- High Quality Randomised Controlled Trials
- that are individual studies
THESE STUDIES:
- have narrow confidence intervals
- they have a low drop out rate
- random allocation takes place
- What are the strengths related with:
Evidence Level 1b?
- IT IS AN INTERVENTIONAL STUDY
- this means that the exposure is assigned to the
participants
- the exposure is not assessed - IT HAS HIGH INTERNAL VALIDITY
- very low Random Error
- very low Bias and Confounding
- IT CAN PROVE TEMPORALITY IS ASSOCIATIONS
- IT IS A STUDY THAT CAN INFER CAUSALITY
- this proves that an exposure causes an outcome
- but this has to be assumed with caution
- since we are only looking at a single study
- What are the Limitations related with:
Evidence Level 1b?
- this is only a single study
- the External Validity could be low
- this is definitely the case if the study sample is too
specific - this means that it will not be representative
- What type of study is related with:
Evidence Level 1c?
- high quality studies
- they are not randomised
- they are not controlled
- they are individual studies
THESE STUDIES HAVE:
- a low drop out rate
- a narrow confidence interval
- What are the strengths related with:
Evidence Level 1c?
- IT IS AN INTERVENTIONAL STUDY
- this means that the exposure is assigned to the
participants
- the exposure is not assessed - IT HAS MODERATE INTERNAL VALIDITY
- it has a lower bias than in Observational Studies
- IT CAN PROVE TEMPORALITY IS ASSOCIATIONS
- What are the limitations related with:
Evidence Level 1c?
- IT IS PRONE TO CONFOUNDING
- this is because of the lack of Randomisation - THE EXTERNAL VALIDITY IS LOW
- since we are dealing with a single study
- the study can be too specific
- this means that it is not representative
- What is the type of study related with:
Evidence Level 2a?
- Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis
- of Cohort Studies
- What are the strengths related with:
Evidence Level 2a?
- IT HAS AN ACCEPTABLE INTERNAL VALIDITY
- very large sample
- low Random error
- IT CAN PROVE TEMPORALITY IS ASSOCIATIONS
- HIGH EXTERNAL VALIDITY
- only if we assume that the samples are representative
- What are the limitations related with:
Evidence Level 2a?
- PRONE TO BIAS AND CONFOUNDING
- this is because of the Methodological limitations
- the study is observational
- CAUSALITY CAN NOT BE INFERRED
- we can not state that the outcome is caused by the
Exposure
- What is the type of study related with:
Evidence Level 2b?
- These studies can be high quality Cohort studies
- these studies are individual
THESE STUDIES:
- have narrow confidence intervals
- they have low drop out rates
- they have accurate assessments
- they are adjusted for confounding
- These studies can be low Quality Randomised Control
Trials (RCTs)- they are individual studies
THESE STUDIES HAVE:
- wide confidence intervals
- they have a high drop out rate
- random allocation is not maintained
- What are the strengths related with:
Evidence Level 2b?
- IT HAS AN ACCEPTABLE INTERNAL VALIDITY
- the sample is large
- random error is low
- this applies only for the Cohort Studies
- IT CAN PROVE TEMPORALITY IS ASSOCIATIONS
- What are the limitations related with:
Evidence Level 2b?
- IT IS PRONE TO BIAS AND CONFOUNDING
- this is due to the methodological limitations
of the included studies
- this is due to the methodological limitations
- CAUSALITY CAN NOT BE INFERRED
- we can not state that the outcome is caused by the
exposure
- What type of study is related with:
Evidence Level 3a?
- Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
- of Case-Control studies
- What are the strengths related with:
Evidence Level 3a?
- A VERY LARGE SAMPLE IS USED
- the Random Error is low - IT HAS HIGH EXTERNAL VALIDITY
- assuming that the sample is representative
- What are the limitations related with:
Evidence Level 3a?
- LOW INTERNAL VALIDITY
- there is Bias present
- there is Confounding - CANNOT PROVE TEMPORALITY IN ASSOCIATIONS
- CAUSALITY CANNOT BE INFERRED
- we cannot state that the outcome is caused by the
exposure
- What type of study is related with:
Evidence Level 3b?
- high quality Case Control studies
- they are individual cases
THESE STUDIES HAVE:
- narrow confidence intervals
- accurate assessments
- no serious recall bias
- adjustments for Confounding
- What are the strengths related with:
Evidence Level 3b?
- THE SAMPLE IS LARGE
- random error is low
- What are the limitations related with:
Evidence Level 3b?
- LOW INTERNAL VALIDITY
- there is bias present
- there is Confounding - CANNOT PROVE TEMPORALITY IN ASSOCIATIONS
- CAUSALITY CANNOT BE INFERRED
- cannot state that the outcome is caused by the
exposure
- What type of study is related with:
Evidence Level 4?
- CASE-SERIES
- this is the follow-up of patients that receive specific
treatments
- we look at their prognosis - CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES
- LOW QUALITY COHORT AND CASE-CONTROL STUDIES
- they have a wide confidence interval
- they have a high bias
- they are affected by Confounding