4.3.1 Experimental design Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

case study

A

an investigation of an activity or problem specific to a real or hypothetical situation that includes many variables and complexities encountered in the real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

classification and identification

A

classification: organisation and categorisation of phenomena, objects, organisms in smaller more manageable groups
identification: recognising whether something belongs in an existing group or new unique group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

controlled experiment

A

experiment investigating relationship between one independent variable and one dependent variable while ensuring all other variables are controlled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

correlation study

A

planned observation and recording of events to find a relationship between variables that are not controlled
(DV linked to possible variables and analysed for amount of correlation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

fieldwork

A

observing and collecting data from natural environment outside of lab measuring effect of IV on DV but not controlling conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

literature review

A

investigating question by collating and analysing secondary data to combine scientific findings from multiple sources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

modelling

A

construction of physical, conceptual or mathematical representation used to simulate real world situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

simulation

A

using existing model to investigate change of variables when real system is too complex to manipulate variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

product, process, system development

A

using scientific knowledge, processes or technology to design product, process or system that meets human needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

independent variable

A

variable changed on purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

dependent variable

A

quantified change in response to IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

controlled variable

A

kept constant in an experiment to ensure only IV affects DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

negative control group

A

group of samples not exposed to any value of IV to provide known level of DV without IV that experimental group can be compared to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

aim

A

relationship between IV and DV you are trying to determine
- to determine how IV affects DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

hypothesis

A

educated and testable prediction of directional relationship between IV and DV
- it is predicted that as IV increase DV will increase/decrease as measured by

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

conclusion

A

directional relationship between IV and DV providing evidence to support/negate hypothesis, referencing validity
- it was found that as IV increased from __ DV in/decreased from __. this supports my hypothesis as DV significantly in/decreased. Validity was low/high

17
Q

primary data

A

data generated by reseracher

18
Q

secondary data

A

data collected by someone from another person’s or organisations research

19
Q

provisional data

A

preliminary or incomplete data subject to revision

20
Q

line graphs

A

continuous IV as we can predict values that fall between our data

21
Q

bar graphs

A

bar graphs for discrete and qualitative IV as they display data as separate categories in separate columns

22
Q

personal error

A
  • cause: human mistake
  • prevention: perform experiment correctly and take more care
  • effect: large variation in data and outliers
23
Q

random error

A
  • cause: unpredictable and caused by chance
  • prevention: conducting multiple trials and calculate average reduces impact and improves data accuracy
  • effect: vary both direction inconsistently of true value (decreases precision)
  • example: sampling error, rounding, inability to read instrument
24
Q

systematic

A
  • cause: predictable caused by inbuilt accuracy or observer bias
  • prevention: recalibrate equipment and eliminate observer bias
  • effect: vary in one direction consistently from true value (decreased accuracy)
  • examples: observer bias, zero error etc.
25
reliability
method's ability to get the same repeated results assessed by - repeatability: same scientist and conditions - reproducibility: different scientist and slightly different conditions improved if error minimised
26
validity
how well experimental design enables production of results/conclustion that addresses stated aim - only IV affects DV - reliability is high - minimised error - significant difference supporting hypothesis
27
limitations
- limited IV variations hard to identify trends or specific values - no control group preventing comparison - small samples (prevent assessment of precision and could be biased samples) - qualitative data open to bias - may not be generalised to real world
28
discrete vs continuous
discrete: counted in whole numbers continuous: measured
29
qualitative vs quantitative
qualitative: described by words quantitative: measured or counted in numbers
30
outlier
value that varies significantly from other values - should not be immediately excluded but analysed by further trails
31
uncertainty
quantitative measure of precision shown as standard deviation from mean