4.5 - Role of the State in the Macroeconomy Flashcards
(53 cards)
Types of expenditure
- Capital government expenditure
- Transfer payments
- Current government expenditure
Capital government expenditure
Spending on infrastructure and long-term assets that will be used over many years, such as building new roads and hospitals
Transfer payments
Payments made by the government to individuals without any goods or services being received in return, such as unemployment and state pension
Current government expenditure
Spending on the day-to-day running of government services, such as public sector wages or interest payments on national debt
Composition and size of public expenditure
In most mixed and free economies, the lower the average income of the country, the lower the percentage of GDP spent by the government is likely to be. This is because poorer countries tend to have a lower tax revenue, due to avoidance, inefficiency at collecting and a smaller amount of wealth to tax
Impacts of composition and size of public expenditure on productivity and growth
- Free market economists argue that government spending is wasteful and causes inefficiency. However, the government is able to enjoy economies of scale when it provides goods, and this improves productivity
- Education creates the human capital necessary for growth whilst the healthcare system reduces the number of days workers lose from serious illness. Spending on research and development may not be done by the private sector and the government will undertake it to give businesses a long term competitive edge
- Government can create a multiplier effect and this can be
focused on areas of the country with high unemployment, creating growth
Impacts of composition and size of public expenditure on living standards
- Government corrects market failure and provides public goods, which improves social welfare
- Important since they reduce absolute poverty by providing benefits and basic goods, such as education and healthcare. In developing countries, governments do not have the resources to do this and this leads to malnutrition and poor water
- Argued that the government will be inefficient at providing goods and services and will have a negative disincentive impact on workers, meaning that output overall is reduced and so living standards fall
- Argued that the government suffers from the principal agent problem since they make decisions on behalf of the people and individuals may have spent that money differently. As a result, there is a loss in welfare and so a fall in living standards
Impacts of composition and size of public expenditure on crowding out
- The limited number of resources in the economy means that for every resource used in government spending, there are less resources available for the private sector. The result is that government borrowing crowds out private sector borrowing and spending and may lead to no real increase in AD
- Free market economists argue that investment would be more efficient if done by the private sector and that the government targets investment poorly and is wasteful
- The crowding out effect is felt most at full employment
- When levels of unemployment are high then extra government spending could lead to crowding in where it encourages investment through the multiplier
Crowding out
In order to spend money above their tax revenues, the government has to borrow from individuals and businesses. However, the amount of money in the economy available to borrow does not increase. The government will therefore be competing with the private sector for finance and will cause higher interest rates. This will discourage firms from investing and individuals from buying on credit
Impacts of composition and size of public of public expenditure on the level of taxation
- In most cases, where government spending is high, levels of tax must be high in order for spending to be sustainable. High levels of tax may have a disincentive effect
- Oil-rich countries tend to be an exception, where revenue from oil can pay for most of government spending
Impacts of composition and size of public expenditure on equality
- Spending should increase equality as it leads to redistribution and helps to provide a minimum standard of living for the poorest in society. It ensures everyone has access to basic goods, such as education and healthcare, which will help give them a fair start in life
Taxation
Tax is used to pay for the number of goods and services that the government provides. On top of this, tax can be used to correct market failure at a microeconomic level and to manage the economy and redistribute income at a macroeconomic one
Progressive tax
Where those who are on higher incomes pay a higher marginal
rate of tax, they pay a higher percentage of their income on tax. Direct taxes tend to be progressive, for example income tax
Regressive tax
Where the proportion of income paid in tax falls as the income of
the taxpayer rises. Those on higher incomes pay a smaller percentage of their income on the tax. Most indirect taxes are regressive, for example everyone pays the same rate of VAT and for those on higher wages this represents a small proportion of their earnings compared to those on low wages
Proportional tax
Where the proportion of income paid on tax remains the same
whilst the income of the taxpayer changes e.g. 10% of income is spent on tax, regardless of income. Everyone pays the same percentage of their income on the tax
Impacts of tax changes on incentives to work
- Argued that high marginal rates of tax will discourage individuals from working. Free market economists argue that the supply of labour is relatively elastic and a reduction in marginal taxes on income will lead to a significant increase in work as individuals work longer hours, accept promotions and more people join the workforce
- High taxes on high income earners could encourage them to move abroad and taxes on the poor may lead to a poverty trap
- Can be argued that higher taxes mean people have to work longer hours in order to maintain their income and so even increases the incentive work
Impacts of tax changes on tax revenues
- The Laffer curve shows that a rise in the tax rate does not necessarily increase tax revenue. If people were taxed at 100%, they would not do any work and this means that tax revenue is 0 at both 0% and 100%
- Tax revenue will initially rise as the tax rate is increased but it will come to a point where revenue is maximised and will then fall. As tax rates rise, motivation and drive will fall so there will be a fall in output and there is an increased incentive to use tax avoidance and tax evasion
Laffer curve
Theory that shows the relationship between tax rates and tax revenue. It suggests that increasing tax rates beyond a certain point will decrease total tax revenue because it disincentivises work, production, and investment
Impacts of tax changes on income distribution
- A progressive tax system will increase the equality of income distribution as more money is proportionally taken from the rich than from the poor
- A regressive one will decrease income equality. Since direct taxes tend to be progressive and indirect taxes regressive, a move from indirect to direct taxes will improve equality
- Problem with using tax to redistribute income is that it does not give the poor anything, so the system needs to be supported with benefits
Impacts of tax changes on real output and employment
- Some taxes affect AD whilst others affect AS. A rise in direct taxes will reduce the level of disposable income an individual has, which will cause a fall in their spending and thus a fall in AD. It could also cause a fall in leftover profits for businesses and therefore a fall in investment. The effect this has on output will depend on where the economy is: whether it is at full employment or not
- Higher indirect taxes and NICs increase costs for firms and this will decrease SRAS. This impact will again depend on where the economy is producing
- Can be argued that income taxes cause a disincentive to work and therefore reduce LRAS as the most skilled workers go overseas and more people become inactive
Impacts of tax changes on price level
- Taxes can impact LRAS, SRAS and AD. Therefore, these changes will impact price depending on where the economy is producing
- Indirect taxes, particularly VAT, often cause cost push inflation
Impacts of tax changes on trade balance
- A rise in taxes will decrease income and therefore decrease consumption, theoretically this will also mean consumers spend less on imports . Imports in the UK have been found to be highly income elastic. As a result, the trade balance will improve in the short run
- However, in the long run, lower AD will reduce businesses’ need to invest and this could reduce competitiveness meaning that exports decrease
Impacts of tax changes on FDI flows
- Low taxes on profit and investment tend to encourage businesses to invest in a country since it will help them to see a higher level of return
- Problem with this is that it can be a ‘race to the bottom’ where countries have to continue to lower their taxes in order to make them the lowest to encourage investment; the eventual result is a fall in revenues for all countries
Automatic stabilisers
Mechanisms which reduce the impact of changes in the economy on national income; government spending and taxation are automatic stabilisers. In a recession, benefits increase as more people are unemployed and so the benefits are a stabiliser as it means that the overall fall in AD is reduced, preventing too much change in the economy. On the other hand, during a boom, tax
increases as people have more jobs and higher incomes, and this tax reduces disposable income so decreases consumption and AD, meaning that demand doesn’t grow too high