4.5 Role of the state in the macroeconomy Flashcards
(73 cards)
Capital government expenditure
Spending on long term investment goods such as new roads, schools and hospitals which will be consumed and provide benefits in over a year
Contributes to economic growth and productivity by enhancing a country’s physical and human capital
Current expenditure
Consists of day to day government spending on recurring items, such as salaries, maintenance and operational costs
Running gov agencies e.g providing public services and covering welfare programmes like JSA
Maintains existing level of public services but does not typically contribute directly to long term economic growth
Transfer payments
Government payments made to individuals or groups without any expectation of goods or services in return
e.g social welfare payments like pensions, subsidies to specific industries and grants to local governments
Redistributive in nature, aimed at providing support to individuals or entities in need
Reasons for changing size and composition of public expenditure
Global context
In response to economic crises or changing economic conditions, governments may increase spending to stimulate growth or reduce spending to control deficits
Changing demographics, such as ageing population, can lead to increased spending on healthcare and pensions
Political ideologies can influence composition of pub expenditure, with some governments favouring social welfare programs and others emphasising defence or infrastructure
Examples of pub expenditure as % of GDP
Higher
France - 58%
Italy - 56%
Japan (ageing population)
USA - 38% austerity adopted since 08’
Lower
2022 - Ireland (21.2%)
Lithuania (36.4%)
Income and % of GDP spent by gov
The lower the average income in most mixed and free economies, the lower is likely to be the percentage of GDP spent by the government
This is because poorer countries tend to have lower tax revenue due to avoidance and inefficiency at collection.
Citizens in higher income countries demand more g+s from their gov which are income inelastic
However, amongst developed countries there are significant differences in the size of gov spending. This can be due to differing attitudes e.g USA and private healthcare
Impact of spending on productivity and growth
Gov spending is wasteful and causes inefficiency according to free market economists
However, the gov can enjoy EOS when it provides goods improving productivity
They also provide infrastructure - improves efficiency of workers and geographical mobility
Education creates the human capital needed for growth whilst healthcare system reduces the num of days workers lose from serious illness
Spending on R+D may not be done by the private sector and gov can undertake this to give businesses long term competitive edge - improving quality of goods and encouraging innovation - dynamic efficiency
Spending creates multiplier effect which can be focused on areas of high unemployment creating growth
Impacts of spending on living standards
Government corrects market failure and provides public goods which can help improve social welfare
They also reduce absolute poverty by providing benefits and basic goods such as education and healthcare
However, in developing countries, governments do not have the resources to do this and this leads to malnutrition, poor water etc
Government can be inefficient at providing g+s and will have a negative disincentive effects on workers meaning overall output is reduced and so living standards fall
Principal agent problem
Government make decisions on behalf of the people and individuals may have spent that money differently. As a result, there is a loss in welfare and so fall in living standards.
However, the political system means that society decides the government and so therefore decides to an extent where it would like money to be spent
Crowding out
In order to spend money above their tax revenues, the government has to borrow from individuals and businesses. However, the amount of money in the economy available to borrow does not increase.
The government will therefore be competing with the private sector for finance and will cause higher I.R.
This will discourage firms from investing and individuals from buying on credit
The limited number of resources in the economy means that for every resource used in the government spending, there are less resources available for the private sector. The result is government borrowing crowds out private sector borrowing and spending and may lead to no real increase in AD
Free market economists argue that investment would be more efficient if done by private sector and that government targets investment poorly
Crowding out effect is felt most at full employment (not alway the case)
Crowding out evaluation
Transfer payments have no impact on output and so would not cause crowding out as resources are simply taken from one group and given to another.
Moreover, when levels of unemployment are high then extra government spending could lead to crowding in where it encourages investment through the multiplier
Level of taxation
In most cases, where government spending is high, levels of tax must be high in order for spending to be sustainable
High levels of tax may have disincentive effect
Oil rich countries
Tend to be an exception from taxing high as revenue from oil can pay for most of government spending
Equality
Spending should increase equality as it leads to redistribution and helps to provide a minimum standard of living fro the poorest in society
Ensures everyone has access to basic goods, such as education and healthcare, which will help to give them a fair start in life
Taxation
Critical for governments to raise revenue and achieve various economic and social objectives such as correct market failure etc
Progressive tax
Those on higher incomes pay a higher marginal rate of tax - pay higher percentage of their income on tax
e.g Direct tax (income)
Regressive tax
Proportion of income paid in tax falls as the income of the taxpayer rises
Those on higher incomes pay smaller percentage of their income on tax
e.g indirect such as VAT
Proportional tax
Where the proportion of income paid in tax remains the same whilst the income of the taxpayer changes e.g 10% of income is spent on tax regardless of income
Incentive to work (tax changes)
High rates of direct tax will discourage individuals from working
High taxes on high income earners could encourage them to move abroad and taxes on poor may lead to poverty trap
High income tax reduces incentives more than high VAT
Free market argue that the supply of labour is relatively elastic and a reduction in marginal taxes on income will lead to a significant increase in work as individuals work longer hours, accept promotions and more people join the workforce
Increased VAT may mean that people have to work longer to maintain income so increase in incentive
Income distribution (tax changes)
Progressive tax system will increase equality of income distribution as more money is proportionally taken from from rich than the poor
Regressive tax decrease income equality
Inheritance tax - most progressive from of tax
One issue with using tax to for redistribution is that it does not give the poor anything, so the system needs to be supported with benefits
Real output and employment
A rise in direct tax will reduce the level of disposable income causes a fall in their spending and thus a fall in AD
Could also cause a fall in leftover profits for businesses and therefore a fall in investment
The effect this has on output will depend whether economy is at full employment or not
Higher indirect tax increases costs for firms and this will decrease SRAS. This impact will again depend on where the economy is producing.
It can be argued that income taxes cause a disincentive to work and therefore reduce LRAS as the most skilled workers go overseas and more people become inactive
Price level
Indirect taxes e.g VAT often cause cost push inflation. They can increase the costs of goods such as cigarettes and fuel if producers choose to past on costs to consumers
Since these are price inelastic, producers are likely to pass on costs of tax onto consumers
Trade balance
A rise in taxes will decrease income and therefore decrease consumption.
Consumers will spend less on imports which have been found to be highly income elastic in the UK.
The trade balance will improve in the short run
However, in the long run, lower AD will reduce businesses need to invest and this could reduce competitiveness meaning that exports will decrease
FDI flows
Low taxes on profit and investment tend to encourage businesses to invest in a country since it will help them to see a higher level of return
The problem with this is that it can be a race to the bottom where countries tend to continue to lower their taxes in order to make them the lowest to encourage investment - leading to a fall in revenues for all countries