Discovery Flashcards

1
Q

Rules that deal wit discovery

A

Rules 26- 37

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Does discover able information have to be admissible at trial?

A

NO

  • relevant information does not have to be admissible at trial
  • material is discoverable so long as it appears “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”
  • need not be admissible at trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is discoverable?

A

Parties may obtain discovery regarding any NON-PRIVILEGED matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense..

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What may the Court do with discovery?

A

(Expand) For good cause, the court MAY order discovery of any matter relevant to the subject matter involved in the action.

(Limit) Court may limit discovery if unreasonably cumulative or duplicate, obtainable from another source more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive, or the burden or expense of discovery outweighs the benefit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When can the court limit discovery?

A

Court can limit discovery if

1) unreasonably cumulative or duplicative,
2) obtainable from another source more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive, or
3) the burden or expense of discovery outweighs benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

FRCP 26(a) Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

(a) Required Disclosures

A

1) Initial Disclosure

requires parties to exchange categories of info that the disclosing party MAY use to support its CLAIMS or DEFENSES

-Parties have to exchange four initial mandatory disclosures within 2 weeks of scheduling conference without being requested by opponent:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

4 initial required disclosures

A
  1. names and locations of witnesses used to support claim/defense
    * if lawyer doesn’t disclose witness and failure was not substantially justified and was harmful, then by FRCP37(c)(1) court should order payment of expense, inform jury of failure, impose appropriate sanctions
    * not experts because ex. DR must examine patient, DR has no discoverable info at the beginning of the case
  2. description and locations of documents may use to support claim/defense
    * exception, if sole use of evidence is for impeachment purely/solely impeachment – cant go to defenses too – judges don’t like that
  3. computation of damages
  4. copies of insurance “if liability to satisfy a potential judgment”
    - Rule provides exception if sole use of evidence is for impeachment – but could be completely prohibited form using the photo if they don’t
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

6 different devices parties may use to obtain information during discovery

A

1) Required (Initial) Disclosures
2) Depositions
3) Interrogatories
4) Requests for Production: Documents, Things, Land and ESI
5) Physical and Mental Examinations
6) Requests for Admissions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Depositions

A

can be oral or written, involve taking the testimony of a witness prior to trial to obtain discoverable information through testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Interrogatories FRCP 33

A

questions posed by one party to another in order to elicit informative responses

Role of interrogatories: identify persons and documents in possession of other side

Drawbacks:
-parties MUST seek permission before exceeding 25 questions

  • and they MAY ONLY BE SENT TO A PARTY, not a nonparty
  • questioner cannot follow up evasive answers, so rarely go beyond routine info.

33(d) if burden is substantially the same or less, the party asking for interrogatory must do it.

1) specify the records that must be reviewed, in sufficient detail to enable the interrogating party to locate and identify them as readily as the responding party could and
2) giving the interrogating part a REASONABLY opportunity to examine and audit the records and to make copies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Requests for Production: Documents, Things, Land and ESI

A

can be served on parties (or non parties) in order to compel the production of certain documents that pertain to topical areas of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Physical and Mental Examination

A

when a party’s physical or mental health is at issue in dispute, parties can use physical and mental examinations to obtain relevant information about a party and their claims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

FRCP 36 requests for admissions

A

are statements served on another party with the request that the statements be specifically admitted or denied;
any admissions in this process will be conclusive evidence at trial with regard to those matters admitted.

  • best used to eliminate essentially undisputed issues

shares 4 characteristics with interrogatories

1) usable only against parties
2) in writing
3) cheap
4) and limited usefulness in most litigation

  • if party does not respond, you can get the court to compel answers under FRCP 26(b)(2)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Difference between depositions an interrogatories

A

depositions are live
-can depose anyone, not just parties
But supena them under FRCP 45

interrogatories are written not in person
-cannot be to people not a party in litigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Requests for Production: Documents, Things, Land and ESI

FRCP 34

A

enables discovery of documents and any tangible item, land, and ESI, does not limit number of documents a party may make

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Procedure for requesting Documents, Things, Land and ESI for a PARTY

A

For a Party- send a FRCP 34 request, specifying documents sought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Procedure for requesting Documents, Things, Land and ESI for a NON-Party

A

FRCP 34 requests served with SUBPOENA under FRCP 45 (command to produce docs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Contents of a request for Production of Documents, Land, Things, and ESI

A

1) must describe with REASONABLE particularity each item or category of items to be inspected,
2) must specify REASONABLE time, place, and manner for the inspection and for performing the related acts; and
3) may specify the form or forms in which electronically stored information is to be produced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Spoliation definition

A

the destruction or material alteration of evidence or failure to preserve property for another’s use as evidence in pending or reasonably foreseeable litigation

20
Q

duty to preserve evidence : Spoliation

A

when you REASONABLY ANTICIPATE LITIGATION involving the evidence, then you MUST preserve all relevant evidence

common reactions to spoliation:

-offer jury adverse inference instruction(evidence lost wouldve been favorable to D)

21
Q

what happens when person requests doc in ESI?

A
  • If request to produce does not specify a form for producing ESI a party MUST produce it in a form which it is ORDINARY maintained in

OR

REASONABLY usable form or forms (one big PDF included in reasonably usable)

22
Q

Does admission in one law suit go to an admission in another law suit?

A

NO

  • if you do make admission, and sued on same basis later, request for admissions rule makes clear that the admission 1 lawsuit DOES NOT CARRY through to another lawsuit
23
Q

Disclosure of experts

(come back, not sure if complete

A

For cases in which parties will call expert witness rule 26(a)(2) provides second disclosure mechanism

-First round: party MUST disclose the identity of such experts

  • For experts specially hired a written report and lists of info MUST follow rule 26(b)(2)(A)-(B)
  • until reports exchanged, neither side can depose the others experts.
24
Q

limits on depositions

A

without seeking permission, total number of depositions taken by one size may not exceed 10

  • no deposition may exceed a day of 7 hours, and no person may be deposed a second time w/o permission of the court or other side,
25
Q

FRCP 26 (b) Discovery and Limits:

Excused Non-Disclosure

A

1) Trial Preparation (Work Product) : Materials
2) Trial Preparation: Experts
3) Claiming Privilege or Protecting Trial Prep.

26
Q

Privilege- an explicit exception to scope

A

Privilege protects information from certain sources

  • privileges are not self-starting, only works if party asserts them
  • can be waived
27
Q

how to privilege claim?

A

making a fucking PRIVILEGE LOG

1) party must make the claim and
2) describe the nature of the documents, communications, or tangible things not protected or disclosed- and do so in a manner that, w/o revealing information itself privileged or protected,

28
Q

Claw-Back Rule

A

when privilege info is accidentally given, the party making the claim may notify any party that received the info of the claim and the basis for it.

  • After being notified the party must promptly return, or destroy the info and any copies it has, and must not use the info.
  • Party making privilege claim must use claw back rule to make sure the privilege is not waived.
29
Q

Work Product Privilege Protection: Trial Prep Material

A
  • party may not discover docs and tangible shit that are prepared in ANTICIPATION of ligation for trial by or for another party or its representatives (including the other party’s atty, consultant, insurer, or agent)
  • only protects documents and tangible things
  • also protects the thoughts of the lawyer
30
Q

Does work product doctrine apply only to lawyers?

A

NO

can apply to its representatives including other party’s atty, consultant, surety, insurer, agent)

as long as it was prepared by agent in PREPARATION FOR LITIGATION

31
Q

Exceptions to work product

A

1) they are otherwise discoverable under 26(b)(1) (“ scope of discovery, generally)
2) the party shows that
(a) it has a SUBSTANTIAL need for the materials to prepare its case and
(b) cannot, w/o undue hardship, obtain their SUBSTANTIAL equivalent by other means

overall:
- if you can establish the information you need is ESSENTIAL to your case and you have no other way of getting it = then you might be able to get access to attys notes

32
Q

three types of Experts

A

1) Fact witness: someone who has factual firsthand experience on case, but is not an expert in the sense in the area of law
- can be deposed right away
2) Opinion testifying witness: an expert who will testify probably not on firsthand account but most importantly will offer evidence in an OPINION/ TESTIMONY form about the area
3) NON TESTIFYING EXPERT: retained but not going to testify in court- just need their expertise about this area of the law

33
Q

Does work product protect facts?

A

NO

  • does not protect facts (know if facts must disclose them)

(Ex: where someone is that took a lot of money to find, must disclose because it is a fact)

34
Q

Expert Opinion (opinion testifying witness)

A

need detailed report on why you think the person is an expert, and the substantive basis for their opinion given 90 days before trial

  • only after identified can the expert be deposed by the other side `
35
Q

Non-Testifying Expert Opinion

A

facts/ opinions by this expert generally NOT DISCOVERABLE by other side because of work product

  • treats non-testifying expert opinion as “work Product”
  • same exceptions apply
    (a) it has a SUBSTANTIAL need for the materials to prepare its case and
    (b) cannot, w/o undue hardship, obtain their SUBSTANTIAL equivalent by other means
36
Q

Difference between Discovery Sanctions and Pleading Sanctions?

(Rule 26 v. Rule 11)

A

Discovery Sanctions (Rule 26) unlike pleading sanctions ( Rule 11) suggest attorney feeds will be appropriate sanctions for violations

37
Q

Protective Order 26(c)

A

party whom discovery is sought may move for a protective order

  • must include that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with other affected parties in an effort to resolve the dispute w/o court action
  • ct may order the protective order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense
38
Q

Motion for an Order Compelling Disclosure

A

Person asking for discovery can ask court to order person to compel the disclosure

  • movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with person or party failing to make disclosure or discovery in an effort to obtain it w/o court action

can make when

1) person fails to answer questions for Depositions
2) corporation fails to answer a subpoena directed at them or questions directed at them
3) party fails to answer an interrogatory submitted
4) a party fails to respond that inspection will be permitted- or fails to permit inspection

39
Q

What happens if party does not disclose initial disclosures that are mandatory and wants to bring evidence later?

A
  • Failure to disclose initial disclosures w/o SUBSTANTIAL JUSTIFICATION means the person is not allowed to bring them at trial
40
Q

Can you send Interrogatories to people who are not a party in the suit?

A

NO

  • May only be sent to a party, not to a nonparty
41
Q

Can you depose a person for a second time?

A

Cannot depose a person a second time w/o permission of the court or the other side.

42
Q

Are privileges self actuating?

A

NO

  • only when party asserts them
43
Q

Can privileges be waived

A

YES

44
Q

What does Work Product only protect?

A
  • Only protects documents and tangible things
45
Q

Fact Witness Expert

A

1) Fact witness: someone who has factual firsthand experience on case, but is not an expert in the sense in the area of law
- can be deposed right away

46
Q

Can a party make a motion to compel w/o first asking the other party to produce information?

A

NO

  • must talk to opposing party first and make certification that made good faith effort to work with opposing party before bringing a motion to compel in court.
47
Q

Are you required to disclose witness or document ( in the initial disclosure) if you are not going to use it?

A

NO

  • only disclose if you MAY use for your own claim or defense
  • do not need to disclose things that are harmful to you and will not use