4th article Flashcards

1
Q

A 61-year-old woman presented to her primary care physician with

A
  1. a 4-week history of progressive bilateral leg weakness, 2. bilateral leg pain, and
  2. difficulty walking.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The weakness was

A

symmetric, without exacerbating or ameliorating factors, and did not fluctuate during the course of the day.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The patient also reported

A
  1. depression,
  2. anxiety,
  3. memory problems, and
  4. intermittent headaches that had begun several months earlier
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

She had a

A

dry mouth but no difficulty swallowing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Previously very active, she had become

A

homebound over a period of several months because of the leg weakness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weakness is a common symptom and can result from

A

dysfunction of either the central nervous system (brain or spinal cord) or the peripheral nervous system (anterior horn cell, nerve, neuromuscular junction, or muscle).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bilateral symmetric weakness of the legs can also result from problems with either

A

the central or the peripheral nervous system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A key question is whether the

A

arms are affected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If the arms are spared,

A

a thoracic spinal cord lesion is most likely.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Peripheral nervous system dysfunction affecting the nerves, muscles, or neuromuscular junction can also cause

A

leg weakness; however, it is unusual for the diffuse processes that cause weakness in the muscles or neuromuscular junction to spare the arms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The history of headaches, anxiety, depression, and memory difficulties in this patient indicates that the

A

brain is involved; because only rare midline brain lesions would affect the innervation of the legs bilaterally, these findings probably reflect a multifocal process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Finally, dry mouth is nonspecific but can tie into

A

leg weakness in many ways — for example, through the myelopathy that may accompany

  1. Sjögren’s syndrome and the
  2. autonomic dysfunction of the Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The patient had a history of

A

breast cancer that had been diagnosed 20 years earlier.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Treatment included

A

lumpectomy and radiation therapy, and there had been no evidence of recurrence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

She also had

A
  1. gastroesophageal reflux disease,
  2. hypertension, and the
  3. irritable bowel syndrome.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Her medications included

A

aspirin, lisinopril, ranitidine, and paroxetine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

She had

A

smoked one pack of cigarettes daily for 45 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Her father had

A

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

her mother had

A

neuromyelitis optica,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

one sibling had

A

scleroderma, and

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

another sibling had

A

head and neck cancer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

The history of

A

breast cancer puts the patient at risk for recurrence, which can take the form of parenchymal lesions in the brain and spinal cord or carcinomatous meningitis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Her smoking history and family history of head and neck cancer put her

A

at risk for a new, smoking-related cancer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Paraneoplastic syndromes, as well as primary or metastatic cancers, can affect

A

the central or peripheral nervous system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Paraneoplastic antibodies produced by typically small tumors can target either

A

neuronal cell-surface and synaptic antigens or intracellular antigens, leading to neurologic dysfunction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Breast cancer and lung cancer in particular have been associated with a

A

wide range of neurologic paraneoplastic syndromes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

The family history of neuromyelitis optica and scleroderma places the patient at risk for

A

autoimmune conditions, many of which, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjögren’s syndrome, can be manifested as leg weakness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

The patient was

A

afebrile.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Her heart rate was

A

84 beats per minute, her blood pressure was 160/74 mm Hg, her respiratory rate was 12 breaths per minute, and her oxygen saturation was 97% while she was breathing ambient air.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

She had moderate

A

weakness in hip flexion and in knee flexion and extension bilaterally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Strength in the feet, ankles, hands, and arms was

A

normal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Knee and ankle reflexes were

A

normal, and plantar reflexes were flexor bilaterally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Sensation of light touch and vibratory sensation were

A

normal throughout her body.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Her casual gait was

A

normal, but she had difficulty with a tandem gait and difficulty standing on her heels or toes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Cranial-nerve function was

A

normal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

The pattern of symmetric, proximal weakness without

A

reflex or sensory abnormalities probably points to a problem at the level of the muscle or neuromuscular junction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Inflammatory diseases of the muscles include

A

polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and inclusion-body myositis; however, the presence of autonomic dysfunction (i.e., dry mouth) and neuropsychiatric features would be atypical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Because most muscle disorders lead to breakdown of the muscles, measurement of the

A

serum creatine kinase level would be useful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Although myasthenia gravis is by far the most common neuromuscular-junction disorder, the absence of

A

oculobulbar features makes this diagnosis highly unlikely.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

The combination of proximal muscle weakness, autonomic dysfunction, and absence of eye findings is most consistent with a diagnosis of the

A

Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

In more than 90% of patients with this syndrome,

A

autonomic dysfunction develops during the course of the disease, usually within the first 3 months after symptom onset.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

To further evaluate these possible diagnoses, the patient should be assessed for the presence of

A

fluctuation, or changes in muscle strength over time, which is a key discriminator between disorders of the muscles and disorders of the neuromuscular junction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

This can be tested by examining sustained power in an affected muscle over a period of

A

10 to 30 seconds or by observing changes in power after exercise of a limb.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Patients with myasthenia gravis may have fluctuation with

A

fatigability, whereas slight increases in strength can be seen in patients with the Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Electromyography and nerve-conduction studies can definitively

A

localize weakness to either the muscle or the neuromuscular junction and provide clues about the cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Repetitive-stimulation testing during nerve-conduction studies can be used to

A

classify disorders of the neuromuscular junction as presynaptic, in which facilitation is seen (e.g., the Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome), or postsynaptic, in which a decremental response is seen (e.g., myasthenia gravis).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Laboratory analysis showed

A
  1. normal blood counts and
  2. normal serum chemical measurements.
  3. Creatine kinase and thyrotropin levels were normal.
48
Q

Computed tomography (CT) of the head and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine showed

A

no abnormalities.

49
Q

The results of conventional nerve-conduction studies and needle-electromyographic examination were

A

normal.

50
Q

However, on repeated stimulation of the left median, ulnar, and peroneal nerves, there was an

A

abnormal decrement (>10%) in the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude.

51
Q

These results confirm a diffuse disorder of the

A

neuromuscular junction, affecting both the arms and the legs.

52
Q

The decremental response suggests a

A

postsynaptic deficit. Myasthenia gravis is the most common cause; the presence of elevated acetylcholine-receptor autoantibody titers would be confirmatory.

53
Q

However, the symptoms and signs remain atypical of myasthenia gravis, because there are

A

no ocular or oropharyngeal symptoms despite generalized weakness.

54
Q

These features, coupled with a history of

A

dry mouth, are consistent with the Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome, which can be associated with a decremental response on low-frequency repetitive stimulation and facilitation of the response only on high-frequency repetitive stimulation.

55
Q

Myasthenia gravis was diagnosed

A

clinically, and treatment with pyridostigmine (60 mg three times daily) was started, but the patient had no improvement in symptoms.

56
Q

A test for acetylcholine-receptor autoantibodies was

A

negative.

57
Q

Chest CT showed moderate

A

centrilobular emphysema but no residual thymic tissue, masses, or lymphadenopathy.

58
Q

During the following 2 months, her symptoms progressed, and she required a

A
  1. walker to ambulate.
  2. Arm weakness,
  3. difficulty eating without assistance, and
  4. increasing memory problems also developed.

She was referred to an academic medical center for further evaluation.

59
Q

The lack of response to pyridostigmine and negative test for acetylcholine-receptor antibodies lead me once again to

A

question the presumptive diagnosis.

60
Q

Although some adults with myasthenia gravis have negative tests for acetylcholine-receptor antibodies, they still

A

typically have a response to anticholinesterase medications and have prominent ocular symptoms.

61
Q

The presentation and course of illness in this case are most consistent with the

A

Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome.

62
Q

Although exploring a separate central nervous system cause for the patient’s cognitive problems may be useful, it is most likely that she has

A

limbic encephalitis caused by an antibody-mediated autoimmune attack on the brain, which may occur in association with the Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome.

63
Q

The key next step is to repeat the

A

electrodiagnostic testing, the accuracy and interpretation of which are dependent on the expertise of the examiner.

64
Q

Neurologic examination revealed

A

intact extraocular movements and normal facial sensation and symmetry.

65
Q

In addition to proximal leg weakness,

A

moderate weakness in arm abduction and elbow flexion and extension were now present.

66
Q

Arm and leg reflexes were

A

normal.

67
Q

The Mini–Mental State Examination score was 25 out of 30, with missed points for

A

date, month, hospital, floor, and recall.

68
Q

Electrodiagnostic studies were repeated at the left

A

median nerve.

69
Q

Motor-nerve amplitudes were

A

reduced, with normal conduction velocities. Sensory nerve conduction velocities were normal.

70
Q

Repetitive nerve stimulation revealed an

A

abnormal, 38% decrement in CMAP amplitude.

71
Q

Immediately after 1 minute of exercise, the maximum CMAP amplitude

A

increased by 94%; 2 minutes after exercise, the decrement in CMAP amplitude was 37%.

72
Q

The increment in CMAP amplitude on repetitive nerve stimulation after exercise is diagnostic of a

A

presynaptic neuromuscular-junction condition, and a diagnosis of the Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome can now be made.

73
Q

Voltage-gated calcium channel antibodies are detected in the majority of cases overall and are particularly

A

common in cases associated with cancer.

74
Q

Cancer is diagnosed in about half of patients with the

A

Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome but may not be recognized at the time of the patient’s initial presentation, because the onset of the Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome often predates the detection of cancer.

75
Q

The patient’s initial chest CT scan did not reveal lesions in the lungs or mediastinum.

Whole-body positron-emission tomography (PET) would be reasonable to determine

A

whether she has extrathoracic cancer.

76
Q

The patient’s persistent cognitive symptoms may represent the

A

encephalopathy that is seen in a minority of cases of the Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome.

77
Q

Imaging of the brain is indicated to

A

rule out an unrelated disorder and to determine whether metastases are present.

78
Q

MRI of the brain showed an

A

abnormal, nonenhancing, bright signal along both hippocampi on T2-weighted images, which was more pronounced on the right side and extended along the parahippocampal gyri (Fig. 1).

79
Q

A paraneoplastic-autoantibody panel revealed

A
  1. antineuronal nuclear antibody type 1 (anti-Hu antibodies) at a titer of 1:1920 (negative titer, <0.02).
80
Q

The P/Q-type voltage-gated calcium-channel antibody test confirms the diagnosis of the

A

Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome in this context.

81
Q

The brain MRI scan shows areas of

A

inflammation in the limbic structures that probably indicate an antibody-mediated attack leading to the encephalopathy.

82
Q

Although many autoantibodies can cause paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis,

A

anti-Hu antibodies are commonly associated with this condition and occur most frequently in the context of small-cell lung cancer. Screening for an underlying cancer is therefore critical.

83
Q

Whole-body PET–CT showed a right precarinal lymph node, 1.9 cm in diameter, with a

A

maximal standardized uptake value of 7.7 (normal value, <2.5) and a right hilar lymph node, 1 cm in diameter, with a maximal standardized uptake value of 2.6 (Fig. 2).

84
Q

A focus of hypermetabolic activity 1.5 cm in diameter was seen in the

A

medial left temporal lobe of the brain, which corresponded to the abnormality seen on the brain MRI scan.

85
Q

There were no other abnormalities of

A

glucose uptake.

86
Q

Chest CT showed a nodule, 7 mm in diameter, in the

A

lower lobe of the right lung; there was no associated hypermetabolic activity.

87
Q

These results are highly suggestive of

A

lung cancer, most likely small-cell carcinoma.

88
Q

A definitive diagnosis should be made by analysis of a biopsy sample from one of the

A

hypermetabolic lymph nodes.

89
Q

Transbronchial needle aspiration of the

A

right precarinal lymph node was performed.

90
Q

Histologic examination revealed

A

small-to-medium-size cells with scant cytoplasm and nuclear molding.

91
Q

Immunohistochemical analysis showed expression of

A
  1. CD56,
  2. chromogranin, and
  3. thyroid transcription factor 1 in tumor cells (Fig. 3); results for CD45, cytokeratin 8, and cytokeratin 34bE12 were negative.
92
Q

Small-cell lung carcinoma leading to the

A
  1. Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome and

2. anti-Hu antibody–associated paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis was diagnosed.

93
Q

The patient began treatment with

A
  1. carboplatin,
  2. etoposide, and
  3. radiation therapy to the mediastinum.
94
Q

At the 6-month follow-up visit, she reported

A

substantial improvement in her leg weakness and no longer required the use of a wheelchair.

95
Q

However, she reported continued difficulty with

A

short-term memory.

96
Q

MRI of the brain showed persistent changes consistent with

A

limbic encephalitis but no signs of metastasis.

97
Q

A CT scan of the chest showed a reduction in the size of the

A

precarinal and right hilar lymph nodes.

98
Q

Because of her persistent memory problems,

A

prophylactic brain irradiation was not performed.

99
Q

The Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome is an

A

uncommon disorder, with a prevalence of 3.4
cases per 1 million people.1 Other causes of proximal muscle weakness, such as myasthenia gravis and the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and inclusion-body myositis), are much more common, with prevalence estimates of 150 cases per 1 million and 100 to 200 cases per 1 million, respectively.2,3

100
Q

Making the diagnosis of the Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome can be challenging;

A

up to 21% of cases are initially misdiagnosed as myasthenia gravis.1

101
Q

How, then, was the discussant (the second author) able to arrive at the correct diagnosis with seeming ease? The key was to carefully consider

A

all the available information in order to identify patterns that pointed to specific diagnoses and ruled out others.

102
Q

For example, what pointed to the muscles or neuromuscular junction as the most likely primary site of dz?

A

the presence of proximal muscle weakness without sensory or reflex abnormalities pointed to the muscles or neuromuscular junction as the most likely primary sites of disease.

103
Q

However, common features of myasthenia gravis, such as oculobulbar weakness, were absent, whereas

A

atypical features, such as dry mouth, headaches, and cognitive dysfunction, were prominent.

104
Q

This led the discussant to consider processes that also involve

A

the autonomic nervous system and the brain, and a pattern that most closely resembled the Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome began to emerge.

105
Q

Diagnostic tests to confirm this diagnosis and to look for underlying cancer were conducted, including

A

whole-body PET–CT and nerve-conduction studies with repetitive-stimulation testing.

106
Q

The Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome results from

A

autoantibodies affecting P/Q-type voltage- gated calcium channels on the presynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction,4 whereas myasthenia gravis results from autoantibodies affecting postsynaptic acetylcholine receptors.

107
Q

Accordingly, presynaptic and postsynaptic neuromuscular-junction disorders can be distinguished by

A

electrophysiological testing with high-frequency or postexercise stimulation.

108
Q

The accuracy of the performance and interpretation of electrodiagnostic studies is dependent on the

A

expertise of the examiner,5 which may explain the different results of the initial and repeated studies in this case.

109
Q

Overall, 50 to 60% of patients with the Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome are found to have an associated

A

cancer — in most cases, small-cell lung cancer. Nonpulmonary cancers, such as prostate cancer, thymoma, and lymphoproliferative disorders, have also been associated with this syndrome.1,6

110
Q

A task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies recommends initial screening with a CT scan, followed by

A

PET imaging or combined PET–CT imaging if the initial CT scan is negative, with follow-up testing for at least 2 years for patients in whom the initial imaging studies are negative.7

111
Q

These recommendations are largely based on data from case series showing a high sensitivity of chest CT for lung cancer (vs. the low sensitivity of chest radiography) among patients presenting with the

A

Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome; among these patients, most cancers that were detected were identified on the initial chest CT scan, and 96% were identified in the first year.7,8

112
Q

However, we lack evidence from randomized, controlled trials regarding the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of this and other cancer screening strategies in such patients. As was observed in this patient,

A

neurologic symptoms in patients with cancer-related Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome often show marked improvement with treatment of the underlying cancer.9

113
Q

In cases in which muscle weakness persists, adjunctive therapies such as

A

pyridostigmine, intravenous immune globulin, or 3,4-diaminopyridine may be considered,1 although the evidence for the effectiveness of these therapies is limited.10

114
Q

Nonspecific symptoms such as

A

weakness can pose a diagnostic challenge for even the most astute clinicians, particularly when a rare disease is the underlying cause.

115
Q

what 2 things should prompt reconsideration of the initial diagnosis?

A

The presence of atypical clinical features or a lack of response to standard therapies