5. environment global governance Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

def global environmental governance

A

international environmental agreements, private bodies, ngos and organizations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

def environmental security

A

the direct impact of climate change is on the daily lives of
people/society/community rather than on state security and violent conf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

def convention

A

a type of general treaty between states often the result of an international conference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

def governing the commons

A

areas and resources that do not fall under sovereign jurisdiction—they are not owned by anybody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

def sustainable dvlpmt

A

as development that meets the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

def epistemic communities

A

as an expertise professional grou

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

def greenwashing

A

behaviour or activities that make people believe that a company is doing more to protect the environment than it really is doing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

environmental history (big stepps)

A
  1. Early Environmental Concerns
  2. 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment (UNCHE) – Stockholm Conference
  3. 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) – Rio Earth Summit
    Held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  4. 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) – Johannesburg Summit
  5. Rise of Environmental NGOs
    Alongside state and UN initiatives, many NGOs became prominent:
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

explain early env concerns as the 1st step of env history

A

The world began seriously addressing environmental issues in the late 1960s.

In 1968, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) agreed to host a major international conference on environmental concerns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Stockolm conference as the 2nd step of env history

A

First major international conference focused on the global environment.

Resulted in:

Creation of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).

Many governments established national environmental departments.

Marked the beginning of institutionalized global environmental governance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rio Earth Summit as the 3rd step of env history

A

Introduced the concept of sustainable development—balancing economic growth with environmental protection.

Highlighted a compromise between:

Developed countries’ environmental priorities.

Global South’s need for economic development.

Produced key agreements like:

Agenda 21

The Rio Declaration

UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Johannesburg Summit as the 4th step of env history

A

Marked the 10th anniversary of the Rio Earth Summit.

Acknowledged the effects of globalization and the urgent environmental challenges in Africa.

Focused on poverty reduction as linked to sustainable development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

rise of env NGOs as the 5th step of env history

A

Friends of the Earth

Greenpeace

World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)

Older groups like the Sierra Club and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds also became more globally active.

NGOs played a major role in shaping global environmental awareness and advocacy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

4 challenges to global env gov

A

*Globalization Effects
-Has led to industrial relocation and population shifts, sometimes reducing the connection between people and nature.
-Contrary to fears, there’s little evidence of a “race to the bottom” in environmental standards.

*Market Failures
-Economists argue that environmental damage is often not reflected in product prices (externalities).
-Environmental costs need to be internalized for markets to work sustainably.

*Positive Impacts of Globalization
-Promotes the sharing of environmental knowledge and innovation.
-Strengthens the role of NGOs in international politics, increasing transparency and pressure on governments.

*Need for Global Solutions
-Environmental issues like climate change are global in nature.
-They require coordinated, international responses—this is the essence of global environmental governance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

5 key institutions involved in climate change debate

A

*United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
-> Coordinates UN environmental activities and assists developing countries in implementing environmentally sound policies.

*UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
-> Main international treaty for addressing climate change.
Hosts the COP (Conference of the Parties) summits, e.g., COP21 (Paris Agreement).

*EU4Climate (European Union Project)
-> Supports Eastern Partnership countries (like Ukraine, Georgia) to develop climate policies, reduce emissions, and meet the Paris Agreement goals.

*Greenpeace
-> International NGO known for direct action and campaigning on climate change, deforestation, and ocean protection.
Influential in public awareness and lobbying.

*World Bank Group
-> Provides financial and technical assistance to developing countries for climate-resilient infrastructure, renewable energy, and adaptation projects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the UNFCCC

A

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) – 1992
-> A foundational treaty signed at the Rio Earth Summit.

Goal: Stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere.

Did not set binding limits, but created a framework for future protocols.

Today, 198 countries are parties to the UNFCCC.

The US withdrew in 2020 under the Trump administration but rejoined in 2021 under President Biden

17
Q

what is the Kyoto Protocole (1997)

A

Made the UNFCCC legally binding for developed countries (Goal: Stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere).

Required industrialized countries and economies in transition to reduce GHG emissions based on individual targets.

Introduced the idea of “common but differentiated responsibilities.”

US never ratified; Canada withdrew in 2011.

Divided the world into:

Annex I (developed countries with reduction targets)

Non-Annex I (developing countries with no binding targets)

18
Q

2009 Copenhagen Accords

A

Aimed to reach a new agreement after Kyoto but lacked strong commitments.

Key tension:

Developed countries refused binding targets.

Developing countries insisted on their right to economic growth and equity.

Outcome: A political agreement, not legally binding, to limit temperature rise and provide financing.

19
Q

Durban Platform (2011)

A

Launched negotiations for a universal legal agreement (led to Paris).

Provided for a second Kyoto commitment period.

Created the Green Climate Fund, aiming to mobilize $100 billion annually by 2020 to help developing countries with mitigation and adaptation.

20
Q

2015 Paris Agreement

A

Entered into force in 2016.

Requires all countries to set nationally determined contributions (NDCs).

Goals:

Limit global warming to below 2°C above preindustrial levels.

Aim for 1.5°C if possible.

Unlike Kyoto, all countries participate, not just developed ones.

The US withdrew in 2020, rejoined in 2021.

Paris Agreement emphasizes transparency, flexibility, and voluntary national action.

21
Q

what are UN climate change conferences (COP)

A

COP = Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC.

Held annually since 1995 (first COP in Berlin).

Recent highlights:

COP28 (2023) – Dubai, UAE. Included the first Global Stocktake, reviewing progress under the Paris Agreement.

COP29 (2024) – will be held in Baku, Azerbaijan.

Hosting rotates among UN regional groups: Africa, Asia-Pacific, Eastern Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Western Europe and Others.

COPs:

Help set standards, promote climate action, and evaluate progress.

Include governments, private sector, civil society, and youth activists.

Advance topics like carbon markets, climate finance, just transitions, and energy transformation.

22
Q

north-south divide in climate negociation

A

The Global North (Post-industrial, Developed Countries)
Focus on agenda-setting and funding climate efforts.

Emphasize mitigation (reducing emissions).

Support carbon border taxes (e.g., EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism).

Tie climate to national security and energy security.

Criticized for their historical responsibility in causing climate change.

🌾 The Global South (Developing, Emerging Economies)
Argue for equity and fairness in climate efforts.

Emphasize economic development and poverty reduction.

Highlight the principle of “Common But Differentiated Responsibilities”:

Developed countries caused most of the problem.

They must take the lead in reductions and support developing countries via funding and tech transfer.

Concerned about food and water security, climate resilience, and adaptation needs.

23
Q

Who is Most Responsible for Climate Change?

A
  1. US, then EU, China, Russia, Germany, India, UK, France
24
Q

great powers in climate change

A

United States
Trump administration announced withdrawal from the Paris Agreement in 2017 (effective in 2020, reversed in 2021 by Biden).

US climate policy has fluctuated depending on political leadership.

G20 Countries
Account for nearly 80% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

Play a crucial role in international climate diplomacy and finance.

COP24 – Katowice, Poland (2018)
Key goal: Implement the Paris Agreement Rulebook (how countries should measure and report emissions).

Russia, US, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait blocked efforts to officially “welcome” the IPCC’s 1.5°C Report, weakening consensus.

Brazil, South Africa, India, and China
Key voices in climate diplomacy, often representing developing country interests.

Supported the Durban Platform (2011) and helped shape the bottom-up structure of the Paris Agreement (flexible, nationally determined contributions).

25
role of the BRICS in global climate governance
Who are the BRICS? Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa — large emerging economies with growing influence in international politics and climate governance. Emissions & Responsibility Today, the BRICS are among the largest GHG emitters. China: #1 global emitter India: rapidly increasing Russia, Brazil, South Africa: major contributors, with sectoral variations Sectoral Breakdown China, India, South Africa: Heavy reliance on coal for energy. Russia, Brazil: Dominated by oil and gas (Brazil also has major agricultural emissions). China & India: Among the world’s top solar energy producers. Russia & Brazil: Major fossil fuel exporters. In UNFCCC Negotiations BRICS do not act as a unified coalition. Except for Russia, most BRICS countries align with the G77 + China bloc, which: Emphasizes economic development. Opposes mandatory emission reductions. Demands fair climate finance and technology transfer. In 1997 (Kyoto Protocol), BRICS were not yet viewed as major economic powers.
26
BRICS after the Paris Agreement
All BRICS nations support the Paris Agreement. They submit Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Differences in emissions sources and energy strategies: China & India: balancing development with renewable energy growth. Russia & Brazil: more focused on fossil fuel exports. South Africa: energy and climate vulnerabilities remain high. Development Finance BRICS emphasize the need for financial support from developed countries for mitigation, adaptation, and clean technology transitions.
27
transnational networks and the Caspian Sea Environmental Program (CEP)
About the CEP: A cooperative initiative among UNEP, UNDP, GEF, and World Bank for environmental protection of the Caspian Sea region. Key Contributions: Financial and technical support to governments. Promotion of regional and international cooperation. Regular meetings fostered socialization and trust-building among state actors. Introduced advanced technologies and expertise to local governments. Helped improve bureaucratic and policy-making capacity in participating countries.
28
climate change as a risk or threat?
Is Climate Change a Risk or a Threat? Debate in international relations and security studies about how to frame environmental issues. Climate as a Security Issue Some scholars and policymakers argue that climate change is more dangerous than terrorism. It can exacerbate: Internal conflicts (e.g., water or food shortages). Cross-border tensions (e.g., migration, competition for resources). Rising interest in the concept of environmental security. Securitization of Climate To securitize climate change means to present it as an existential threat needing emergency action. Can lead to greater political attention and funding, but also risks militarizing the issue. Key Concept: Climate change is a “security risk” rather than a “security threat”. Risk implies uncertainty and long-term systemic consequences. Threat implies an immediate, identifiable enemy (like a military adversary).
29
What does Radoslav Dimitrov mean by “empty institutions”?
Dimitrov defines empty institutions as international institutions deliberately designed not to deliver substantive policy. These are bodies that consist of rules and procedures but lack mandates for regulatory policymaking or implementation. They are not failed institutions, but are instead purposefully created with no real authority or capacity for meaningful action. -> * Face-saving function: Empty institutions allow states to appear as though progress has been made, masking negotiation failures and avoiding reputational damage. * Decoy function: They fill institutional space to distract public scrutiny, preempt genuine governance, and legitimize inaction. * Dual logic of behavior: The creation of such institutions is driven by both the logic of consequences (strategic behavior) and the logic of appropriateness (conforming to international norms of diplomacy and negotiation).
30
empirical application of DImitrov concept to Copenhagen Accord; UN Forum on Forests; UN commission on Sustainable Development
* Copenhagen Accord (2009): A non-binding agreement announced as a success, despite having no enforcement mechanisms or obligations. It was premeditated to create an illusion of success in climate negotiations. * UN Forum on Forests (UNFF): Created with no mandate to implement or finance forest policy; a classic example of an institution deliberately designed to be impotent. * UN Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD): Operated for 20 years without policy power or binding decisions, largely serving as a dialogue forum.
31
Bäckstrand's "hybrid multilateralism" concept
the concept of “hybrid multilateralism”, where state and non-state actors increasingly interact in climate governance. They emphasize how NGOs, cities, corporations, and other non-state actors have been included in platforms like the NAZCA database or the Lima–Paris Action Agenda (LPAA) — often in roles such as observers, implementers, or watchdogs. However, the authors also note: * Many of these non-state initiatives are voluntary and lack enforcement. * Participation does not always equate to meaningful influence. * The space for civil society in negotiations, especially after Copenhagen, has become increasingly controlled and symbolic. In this light, Dimitrov’s concept can be extended: non-state actor involvement can also be co-opted into “empty” frameworks — included to give the appearance of pluralism or momentum, but with little substantive policy power or accountability. Example: The Climate Action Tracker and similar initiatives aim to hold states accountable, but their influence depends on states' willingness to respond. This reflects a symbolic rather than institutionalized accountability mechanism — potentially rendering their role procedural but powerless if not coupled with structural authority.