5) Pretrial Procedure Flashcards

(46 cards)

1
Q

complaint: must contain

A

1) grounds for SMJ
2) st of facts
3) demand for judgment+ relief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

complaint: statement of facts: sufficiency

A

sufficient to show that P is entitled to relief – can be simple, but must be PLAUSIBLE.

*fraud/mistake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

complaints: statement of facts: sufficiency: fraud/mistake

A

higher standard! Need sufficient particularity (not general allegations)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

amending complaint: 2 ways

A

1) as of right
2) w permission

always think about sol too!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

amending complaint: as of right

A

–w/in 21 days of service of complaint (or of answer/mxn dismiss)

can do this 1x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

amending complaint: things to think about

A

SOL

right vs permission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

dl to amend answer

A

ok amend answer w/in 21 days of service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

amending complaint: w permission

A

1) all opposing parties consent OR

2) court can give permission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

amending complaint: court permission: factors

A

usually liberally granted. consider:

1) reason for delay
2) will it prejudice other party?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

amendments + SOL: no new claims or parties

A

no SOL issues if no add new claims/parties (just correcting errors, omissions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

amendments+ SOL: new claims

A

can relate back IF new claim arises from same transaction or occurrence as existing claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

amendments + SOL: adding new parties

A

must arise from same transaction or occurrence AND
(all 3):
1) party knew of lawsuit soon enough to not be prejudiced and no later than time permitted for service
2) should have expected to be named as a D
3) left out bc of mistake in identity (not litigation strategy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

service: process (def)

A

complaint + summons: must serve BOTH at same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

service: dl

A

w/in 90 days of filing cmplt

court might give adl time if good cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

service: who

A

18+, not a party to action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

service: constitutional

A

must comply w constitutional minimums (must have had adequate notice of claims – was service reasonably calculated to notify D?) (can still go on in suit if made every reasonable effort)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

service: people: ways: mnemonic

A

PAAWS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

service: people: ways:

A

1) personal
2) abode
3) agent
4) waiver
5) state methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

service: people: ways: state methods (def)

A

in state court way (state where filed OR state where service happens)

20
Q

service: people: ways: personal: def

A

deliver process to D himself wherever he is

21
Q

service: people: ways: abode: def

A

leave at usual place of abode w a person

  • -of suitable age or discretion
  • -who RESIDES there
22
Q

service: people: ways: agent: def

A

serve D’s regsitered agent

23
Q

service: people: ways: Waiver: def

A

mail to D w letter requesting he waive (if he refuses, must pay cost of being personally served. also gets mroe x to rp)

24
Q

service: corporations: ways

A

1) serve on an officer
2) serve on managing agent/general agent
3) serve on any other agent authorized by appointment/law

25
service: if law requires service by mail on agent
then must also serve in person
26
service: needed when new claims added?
only new parties (to activate PJ over them)
27
rp to complaint: options
1) answer 2) mxn for more definite st 3) mxn strike 4) mxn dismiss
28
rp: answer: def
admits/denies allegations
29
rp: answer: effect of not denying an allegation
deemed admitted!
30
rp: answer: effect of not including a defense in your answer (and exceptions)
usu forfeiting that defense exceptions: 1) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted 2) failure join nec party 3) lack of SMJ
31
rp: mxn for more def st: def
cmplt or answer is so vague/ambiguous that rp party can't reasonably rp so move court to clarify
32
rp: mxn strike: def
cmplt or answer contains redundant, immaterial, or scandalous matter. court may (on its own or by mxn) order strike
33
rp: mxn dismiss: def
mxn dismiss: seeks dismissal of claim and can be filed by any party defending
34
rp:timing
21 days if served, 60 days if waived service
35
rp: timing: seocndary rp
if mxn denied hten must file answer w/in 14 days of denial
36
ethical obligations
presenting doc to court certifies: 1) good faith 2) good facts 3) good law
37
ethics: good faith: def
not for improper purpose
38
ethics: good facts: def
based on evidentiary support or (if noted) will have after dy
39
ethics: good law: def
nonfrivolous argument for change in existin glaw
40
ethics: sanction
must serve mxn for sanctions 21 days before filing to give time to correct
41
ethics: sanction: goals
must be deter not punish
42
ethics: sanctions: who (exception)
1) anyone who committed violation (exception: unrepresented parties/"good law" req) 2) entire law firm if 1 atty
43
preliminary injunction vs tro
PI: must give notice to adverse party AND pendancy of the lit TRO: ex parte AND only lasts 14 days
44
tro: must show
tried to notify opposint party but unable
45
pi: elements
1) likelihood of success on merits 2) ireparable harm 3) balance of hardships 4) public interest 5) payment of security
46
pi: irreparable harm: standard
courts usu find any violation of right ocunts as irreparable