503 Midterm Flashcards

(48 cards)

1
Q

3 Levels of Albertas court

A
  1. Provincial court of alberts
  2. Court of Queen’s bench of Alberta
  3. Alberta court of appeal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Provincial court of Alberta

A
  • Traffic
  • family
  • criminal
  • civil
  • claims involving less than $50 000
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Provincial court of Alberta judges:

  • What they wear
  • How are they addressed?
A

wear: robes and blue sashes

Adressed: Your honour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Court of Queens Bench

A
  • Civil
  • Criminal
  • Family law
  • Appeals from the provincial court decisions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Court of Queen’s Bench:

  • What they wear
  • How are they addressed?
A

Wear: red sashes

Adressed: My lady or My lord, Mr/mrs justice, last name

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Alberta Court of Appeal

A
  • Highest court in Alberta
  • Appeals from queens bench
  • appointed by federal government
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Unwritten Rules

A
  • lawyers called to bar based on years of practice

- address other lawyers as my friend

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Supreme Court of Canada

A
  • highest court in canada
  • 9 judges
  • appeals from appellate courts
  • majority rules
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Burden of Proof

A

prove beyond a reasonable doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does criminal matter get to court

A
  • Charges laid
  • Crown prosecutor review file
  • Proceed resolve or dismiss
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Prosecutorial Discretion

A
  1. reasonable likelihood of conviction

2. Public policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Assault (what & punishment)

A
  • without consent of another person, he applies force intentionally to that person directly or indirectly
  • not more than 5 years
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm (what & punishment)

A
  • not more than 10 years

- causes bodily harm to the compliant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Aggravated assault (what & punishment)

A
  • wounds disfigured or endangers the life of compliant

- not more than 4 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Judicial notice

A

takes notice of something without having to see evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Todd Bertuzzi

A
  • Bertuzzi punches Moore in back of head causing concussion and broken neck
  • Bertuzzi plead guilty
  • charged with assault causing bodily arm
  • Once he has completed 1 year probation and all conditions he will not gain criminal record
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

McSorley

A
  • Mcsorley slashes Brashear in head with hockey stick
  • Pled not guilty, but was charged with assault with weapon
  • Probation, had to retire from NHL
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How a case file is organized: FILAC

A
Facts
Issues
Law
Analysis
Conclusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Jobidon

A
  • Two agreed to fight in parking lot of bar
  • Jobidons first hit knocked victim out
  • he proceeded to fight even though unconcious
  • Victim died
  • Convicted with manslaughter
  • Victim consented but not to death
  • Supreme court Cananda
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Caster Semenya

A
  • Testosterone levels too high to compete in 400, 800 & 1500
  • she needed to reduce the levels using brith control
  • Court of arbitration
  • refused and tried case
  • unsuccessful
  • Did not compete in Tokyo Olympics
21
Q

Sagen Case

A
  • Womens ski jumping not in Olympics
  • Violates equality rights
  • section 15 of charter
  • Challenged several times in different courts
  • Gender charter challenge
  • Went to supreme court but was unsuccessful
22
Q

Russell Case

A
  • Fraud
  • Superior court of Ontario found info given to be fraud and sent it back to arbitrator mew
  • because changed policy he re-appealed and was successful
  • could coach again
23
Q

Bodily Harm Definition

A

injury to compliant that interferes with the health or comfort of the compliant and that is more than merely transient

24
Q

Witness

A
  • who ever called. witness examines them first
  • cross-examined
  • once evidence is given they can remain in courtroom
25
Arbitration
The settling of a dispute by an arbitrator
26
Arbitrator
impartial person chosen by parties to resolve a dispute
27
Informed consent
Nature and risk of medical procedure example
28
Implied consent
nature of the sport
29
4 Legal issues regarding the validity of the DSD Regulations
1. burden of proof 2. discrimination? 3. necessary? 4. reasonable and proportionate
30
Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section 15
Equality rights
31
3 levels of Government involved in Multiparty Agreement
1. Municipal 2. Provincial 3. Federal
32
Alberta Human Rights Act-Protected grounds
``` Race Religious beliefs Colour Gender Physical disability Mental disability Age Ancestry Place or origin Marital staust Source of income Family status Sexual orientation ```
33
Human Rights Complaints
assigned a human rights officer who will review the complaint and response
34
Human rights officer determines
1. Conciliation process | 2. Investigation process
35
Human Rights Complaint 3 Steps (Tribunal process)
1. Referral 2. Dispute resolution 3. Hearing
36
What does R stand for in citations
Regina (cour
37
Fraud is proven when ...
It is shown that a false representation has been made..Knowingly without belief in it truth recklessly, carelessly whether it be true or false
38
Jurisdiction
Do they have the authority to hear the case, if not they cannot hear it
39
S.O.P. does what
sets out factors for the arbitrator to consider to determine whether exceptional circumstances justifying the reinstatement exist
40
Factors of S.O.P (10)
1. Age 2. Remorse 3. Circumstances 4. Experience 5. Rehabilitation 6. Prior and post offence 7. Contribution to sport 8. Cooperation with investigation 9. Length of suspension 10. Other factors
41
Struck
not included
42
Hearsay
Someone else's word
43
How can an appeal be reopened
Due to a policy change
44
How many jury members are in a criminal matter
12
45
Claims involving less than $50 000 are in what court
Provincial court
46
Claims involving more than $50 000 are in what court
Queens bench
47
How many judges in the Supreme court of Canada?
9 including Chief Justice
48
How a civil file get to court (CDARQT)
1. claim 2. defence 3. applications 4. Records 5. Questioning 6. Trial