5.3 How Does Economic Change Influence Patterns of Social Inequality in Places? Flashcards
(71 cards)
What is social inequality?
Differences, based on factors such as age, ethnicity gender, religion, education and wealth, exist in a societies. Such differences often raise moral issues concerning inequality.
Because social differences vary from place to place geographers can make significant contributions to debates about spatial inequality.
The terms ‘quality of life’ and ‘standard of living are frequently used when discussing differences between places. It is important to distinguish between them as they are not the same.
What are the physical indicators of QOL and SOL?
- Quality of housing
- Level of pollution (air/noise\0
- Incidence of litter
- Graffiti
- Vandalism
What are the economic indicators of QOL and SOL?
- Access to leisure services, open spaces
- Access to employment (percentage unemployed long term, youth unemployment)
- Level of income
- Percentage of lone parent families
- Percentage of lone pensioners
What are the political indicators of QOL and SOL?
- Opportunities to participate in the communities life and influence decisions (percentage voting in elections)
What are the social indicators of QOL and SOL?
- Percentage on state benefits
- Standards of education (percentage staying on post 16 education or to degree standard)
- Standard and access to health facilities (percentage in poor health)
- Percentage on free school meals
- Fear of crime
- Incidence of crime
What is quality of life?
the extent to which people’s needs and desires (social, psychological or physical) are met. This can be seen in areas such as the treatment of people. Are all people treated with equal dignity and do they have equal rights? Does everyone have reasonable access to services such as health care, education and leisure? Are all opinions heard and respected?
What is standard of living?
the ability to access services and goods. This includes basics such as food and water, clothes housing and personal mobility.
What are the main factors that social inequality influences?
Clearly income and wealth are significant factors in determining both standard of living and quality of life. Higher incomes tend to offer people greater choice of housing education and diet. But a rise in income may not always lead to improved quality of life. Longer hours at work, a longer daily commute, migration away from family and friends sometimes to a foreign country, poor air quality and pollution are examples of factors that can lead to a higher income and standard of living but can result in a lowering in the quality of life. In other words quality of life may be sacrificed for a higher income. When social inequalities lead to very great differences between groups of people, the term- deprivation is commonly used to refer to a context when quality of life and standard of living are low. Deprivation is more than just poverty. Poverty is not having enough money to support a decent standard of living whereas deprivation refers to a general lack of resources and opportunities. The UK government uses an Index of Multiple deprivation to assess relative levels of deprivation. Seven factors are combined to give an overall measurement: income, employment, health, education, crime, access to housing and services, and living environment such as air quality.
Povertypoor living conditionsill healthpoor educationpoor skillspoverty
All the smallest scale LSOA census units in the census can be ranked according to their Index of Multiple Deprivation score. This allows us to identify the most and least deprived areas in England and Wales and compare levels of deprivation between areas. It is important to understand that such indices do not tell us by how much one place is more or less deprived than another. For example, if a place has a rank of 80, it is not necessarily twice as deprived as a place with a rank of 160.
How can income be measured for social inequality?
At the global scale the role of income in measuring social inequality is seen in the World Bank’s (2015) definition of extreme poverty: US$1.90/day PPP (purchasing power parity! Below this level of income, a person cannot afford to purchase the minimum amount of food and non-food essentials such as clothes and shelter. The use of purchasing power is important as the cost of obtaining a particular good or service can vary greatly from one country to another
Relative poverty is a useful measure as it relates the level of poverty to the distribution of income across the whole population. Each year the UK government publishes a survey of income poverty called the Households Below Average Income (HBA) The survey defines relative poverty as 60 per cent of the UK median household income. The provisional 2019 HBA report shows 14 million inhabitants of the UK, including some 2.7 million children, currently fall below this threshold
The USA also uses a poverty threshold to differentiate between poor and non-poor. It is a monetary value adjusted each year to take account of changes to inflation
The Gini coefficient is a technique that can be used to measure levels of income inequality within countries. It is defined as a ratio with values between 0 and 1.0. The lower the value the more equal is income distribution. A Gini coefficient of 1.0 would mean that all the income in a country was in the hands of one person while a value of O indicates that everyone in a country has equal income.
How can housing be measured for social inequality?
Being able to afford accommodation of an adequate standard is closely related to income. At all scales social inequality is evident in the type and quality of housing people occupy
Housing tenure is an important indicator of social inequality. Owner-occupiers own their house outright. In many ACs this is achieved through borrowing money in the form of a mortgage which is normally paid back over 25 to 30 years. Some people rent from private landlords while others rent from a local authority (council). Charities and housing associations also provide subsidised accommodation for rent. In many LIDCS, housing tenure is complex, especially in the slum areas. In many such areas a well organised system of landlords and tenants exists. The term squatter settlement’ is often misleading and should only be used where people have no legal right to the land they occupy.
How can education be measured for social inequality?
Formal education is provided by schools, colleges apprenticeships and universities. Informal education can be gained from doing something in the home or workplace, for example, learning how to cook at home or watching an older brother or sister milk a cow or repair some machinery. The acquisition of skills can be underestimated if only formal qualifications are measured. This is particularly true when studying societies in EDCs and LIDCs.
Contrasts in literacy levels give an indication of inequality in education. Literacy is a measure of the ability to read and write to a basic level. Globally there are clear contrasts among countries in levels of literacy and especially in terms of gender equality.
How can health care be measured for social inequality?
Access to health care and levels of ill-health are closely associated with social inequality. The association between poverty and ill-health is very strong and reflects a number of influences. These influences include variables which are clearly health- focused such as number of health care professionals. The measure of number of doctors per 1000 people is often used to describe health inequality between places at the global scale.
In the UK, increasing attention is paid to unequal access to health care, the so-called ‘postcode lottery. Depending on where you live, the level of medical provision through the National Health Service varies.
In part these differences may reflect the priorities of Health Care Trusts and differences in morbidity and life expectancy.
But health is not just a matter of medical provision. Access to clean water, effective sanitation, quality and quantity of diet, type of housing and air quality. for example, have significant influences. It is also a matter of social behaviour and lifestyle, for example, attitudes towards vaccination and tobacco and alcohol consumption. HIV/AIDS has had a serious impact in places such as sub-Saharan Africa. In part this is due to the attitudes towards male-female relationships and ignorance.
How can employment be measured for social inequality?
Whether a household includes someone who is in receipt of regular income has a profound impact on the standard of living and quality of life. Unemployment is perhaps the obvious measure but it is not always straightforward to assess. Not all countries take counts of employment and defining what counts as employment and what does not can be difficult.
Someone may be in employment but receiving only low wages. In ACs, it is generally the case that rural places have average incomes below those in towns and cities. In urban areas in LIDCS and EDCs millions of people make a living by working in the informal. sector of the economy. This offers a relatively easy way into employment but has drawbacks. For example, someone selling fruit or brooms on a street corner might work for ten hours or more in a day and yet still be unable to afford to live anywhere except in a slum settlement.
Social inequality exists at all scales. It is clear that an individual’s life chances are closely related to where they live.
Human Development Index (HDI)- a composite measure of inequality From 1990 the UN has produced an annual assessment of the level of development of each of its member states. It is based on economic and social indicators:
- Income adjusted to take account of purchasing power in the country Life expectancy at birth
- Education using the adult literacy rate and the average number of years spent in school
The index ranges from 1 (most developed) to (least developed). A high index equates to 0.8 and above, medium index from 0.5 to 0.79, and a low index is less than 0.5. The HDI highlights the great inequalities that exist between countries in both economic and social terms.
Why do spatial variation in social inequality occur?
Inequalities exist at all scales from the global to the local. There are inequalities between urban places and rural places and there are also contrasts at the intra- urban scale. Several factors influence the relative level of social inequality between places. A single factor is unlikely to explain inequalities at any scale. It is the interaction of several factors which tends to lead to spatial patterns of inequality
How can wealth vary spatially?
The ability to purchase goods and services is fundamental to social well-being, Everywhere, low incomes are linked to factors such as ill-health, lower educational attainment and poor access to services.
The lack of formal qualifications and low skill sets are major obstacles to raising income and thereby reducing social inequality.
The cost of living is an important consideration when discussing the role of wealth. If a person’s income rises, but increases in the cost of food, housing, clothes and fuel outstrip the additional income then that person is relatively less well-off. A key factor here is disposable income: the amount left over after the essentials of Life (food, housing clothing) have been bought.
How can housing vary spatially?
Quality of accommodation is a significant influence on social inequality. The smaller the income of a household, the less choice of housing they have Poor quality housing and overcrowded conditions often create ill-health. Such inequality in access to the housing market often occurs when demand exceeds supply. In LIDCS and some EDCs, millions of people have little choice but to live in slum housing Often because of rapid urbanisation, the municipal authorities are simply overwhelmed by the scale of demand and lack the resources to increase the supply of decent housing
Homelessness is a growing problem among urban populations in many ACs. This group often exists on the margins of society and may resort to squatting illegally in derelict or empty buildings
Also in ACS the affordability of housing contributes to social inequality. When the cost of housing, either through purchase price or rent, inflates at a faster rate than wages and other prices, those with low or irregular incomes can find themselves excluded from the housing market. In the UK, traditionally low-cost social housing was provided by local authorities but since the 1980s, the availability of this type of accommodation has decreased dramatically. This is also a cause of inequality in rural regions. The rise in second-home ownership and the migration of wealthy people into the villages and small towns of the countryside have raised property prices beyond the reach of many young families.
How can health vary spatially?
In all societies there is a clear link between ill health and deprivation, Sub-standard housing poor diet, unhealthy lifestyles and the additional stress of day-to-day living in poverty take their toll on human health, Access to medical services also plays a part: often, and at all scales, the distribution of health care services is uneven. Within a local area for example, some groups such as the elderly have limited mobility which restricts their access to GPS and primary health care. In rural areas where health facilities are widely dispersed, accessing medical care can be an issue for households without access to a car or public transport.
How can education vary spatially?
Differing access to educational opportunities is recognised as a significant element in creating and maintaining inequalities. Achieving universal primary education was one of the Millennium Development Goals and most governments invest in education to raise standards of living and quality of life. Illiteracy excludes people from accessing education and skills training and therefore reduces employment opportunities. Accessing even basic education can be a major issue in rural regions in LIDCs.
How can access to services vary spatially?
It is often the case that how accessible services are to people greatly affects both their quality of life and standard of living. It is a significant disadvantage to people if they find accessing services difficult.
At the global scale, there are stark inequalities between societies in AC’s, EDC’s and LIDC’s in terms of access to services. For example, one measure of access to medical services is the number of doctors per thousand people. According to 2018 world bank data, in 29 in Norway (AC) there are nearly three (2.9) in Brazil (EDC) there are just over two (2.2) while in Kenya (LIDC) the figure is well below one (0.2)
The picture for access to education is likewise one of clear inequality among the three categories of country.
At the national scale, most countries display inequalities between regions. People living in core regions, such as most capital cities, where wealth and investment are high, tend to have good access to services whereas the more peripheral regions, those usually furthest away from the core, suffer from limited access.
What three factors influence access to services and how it varies spatially?
Access to services is influenced by three factors
- number of services
- how easy it is to get to the service, eg quantity and quality of transport links and geographical distance
- social and economic factors, eg factors such as age gender income
There is often a clear urban-rural divide in access to services. On average urban dwellers have better access to services than their rural counterparts. However, within both urban and rural locations, those with higher incomes are nearly always advantaged as regards their access to services. People living in low status housing districts, whether located in ACS, EDCs or LDCS struggle to access services such as retailing, public transport or banking
One recent service which shows distinct differences among places is access to the internet. A digital divide exists in terms both of possessing the means to be online, for example, owning equipment such as a mobile phone or laptop, as well as the quality (speed and bandwidth) of a connection. In the UK, for example, there are significant contrasts between urban-rural areas close to urban centres and remote rural areas in terms of broadband speeds Although in nearly all countries investments in broadband are growing, in general the faster speed areas tend to get faster and faster with slow speed locations lagging behind.
It is interesting how in some EDCs and LIDCS mobile phone technology is beginning to transform lives and reduce inequalities. The growth in satellite technologies removes the need to set up fixed copper cables and with solar-powered recharging equipment, even very remote places can become linked in.
One way in which social inequality can persist is in those places where the authorities restrict access to internet services. In both China and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North) Korea) internet access is severely controlled by the governments.
What is the role of globalisation in economic change?
In economic terms, globalisation has led to increasing flows of ideas, capital, goods and services and people The global economy has become knitted together ways that have never happened before. Globalisation driven by economic changes across all scales from t global to the local.
Geographers identify transnational corporations and nation states as key players in the global economy Relationships among TNCs and between TNCS and states drive changes that impact the lives of billions of people
What is one major consequence of globalisation in economic change?
One major consequence is global shift. This refers to the relocation of manufacturing production on a global scale. Fifty years ago most manufacturing was concentrated in western Europe and North America Raw materials such as copper and coffee were exported by countries like Zambia and Brazil, which had limited manufacturing bases of their own. From the 1980s the New International Division of Labour (NIDL) gathered pace. European, North American and Japanese TNCS created labour-intensive factories in what were called Newly Industrialising Countries (NIC), mainly East Asia and Latin America. Containerisation and Bulk handling brought down relative costs dramatically and so contributed to the locational changes
With economic restructuring came the loss of employment in the primary and secondary sectors as the comparative advantages of ACS in primary and secondary activities declined. ACs transformed into post-industrial societies in which most people worked in the tertiary and quaternary sectors.
What is the impact of structural economic change on people and places?
Inevitably economic restructuring led to mine and factory closures and job losses in ACs, a process known as deindustrialisation. Some places which relied heavily on a narrow range of traditional economic activities such as mining, iron and steel making, shipbuilding or textiles were badly affected by deindustrialisation Unemployment and associated problems such as -health increased significantly and were often concentrated in inner city neighbourhoods or on local authority housing estates in the suburbs. The skills required by traditional heavy industries were not easily transferable to the growing service sector. Moreover, the physical environment of deindustrialised regions was often poor, with a legacy of abandoned and derelict buildings and polluted land and waterways. However, some places hardest hit by deindustrialisation and economic change, such as Essen in Germany, Pittsburgh in the US and Swansea in south Wales, have been rebranded and have witnessed significant regeneration.
What is the cycle of structural economic change?
Establishment of large manufacturing plant–>Expansion of local job opportunities and population–> Inflow of business and capital to satisfy increased local demand- secondary and tertiary development–> Substantial rise in per capita incomes–> Higher tax base increases local government spending power–> Improvement of physical and cultural infrastructure