Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Y2 T1 Geography 240 > Lectures > Flashcards

Lectures Flashcards

1
Q

How can citizens affect change?

A

Urban planning, urban design, public engagement, civic pride.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

5 Epochs of growth?

A 
Mercantile era pre-1800
Agricultural settlement 1800-1850
Great Transition 1850-1945
Post WW II Boom 1945-1975
De-industrialization 1975-today
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mercantile era pre-1600

A 
1. Colonial expansion
Staples export 
Indigenous population decimated
Cities small population; Montreal 6,000 (1800)
Grid road patterns dominate layout
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Agricultural settlement 1800-1850

A 
2. Settler population expansion
High immigration from Europe
Land clearing, open access agriculture
Agricultural, rural economy serviced by city
Overcrowding, disease, fire
Railroads promote city expansion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Great Transition 1850-1945

A 
. Railroad network
Expansion staples economy
Settlement of prairie
Industrial heartland formed
Inner city formed
CBD
Transition (mixed use activities)
Factory belt (harbour or rail yards)
Residential (segregated, income, ethnicity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fordist Economic Boom1945-75

A 
4. Post World War. Regime of accumulation
Post WWII consumer
Henry Ford; assembly line, working class
Car ownership, flight to suburbs
Government builds roads, highways
Land use separation, CBD decline
Urban renewal; gentrification
Late 1960s:Office towers, retail revival
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Pre/post-WW II

A 
4. Pre  and post WWII: inner city suburbs (older neighbourhoods)
Grid street plan
Housing shortage post WWII
Post 1950s: grid street compromised
Introduction of curvilinear street plans
Cul-de-sac designs
Suburban expansion, freeway expansion
From public to private space
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Deindustrialization 1975-today

A 
5. 1975 economic decline
Less government stimulation ($)
Privatization of services, programs
Reduced social programs
Rise of service sector, drop in industry
Edge cities (suburban downtowns)
De-regulation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

garden city?Ebenezer Howard (1910s)

A

circular design that separates everything out into different rings with a few main roads in and out.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Over __% of world population live in cities (2007)

__% of Canadians live in cities

A

50, 80

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What can we do to affect change?4

A
  • Urban planning
  • Urban design
  • Public engagement
  • Civic pride
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how many cars in USA in 1894,1896,1890,1920?`

A

4,16,8000, 27 Million

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Jane Jacobs

A

critic of CBD abandonment, 1950-1970’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Vertical City Movement =Le Corbusier (1930s)

A

Vertical dwellings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Urban Transitions(4)

A
  1. Street car suburbs (1940s) inner city suburbs
  2. Auto-oriented development (1950s) Freeway era
  3. Transit investments (1970s) Bus, Light rail
  4. The New Urbanism (2000s) People Focuses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Urban Living 1850-1920

A

Industrialization
Congested habitation
Lack of building codes, health inspections
Lack of sewage and running water (1910 Winnipeg, half of city no running water)
Lack of fire codes, no fire departments
Disease, filth; urban living not tolerable for the masses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

World’s Columbian Exposition1893

A

Chicago’s world fair, known for being huge game changer in architecture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

French neo-classical design

Beaux Arts style

A

Symmetry, balance, and splendor
EX: Pont Alexandre III
Paris, FR 1896-1900
EX: Singer Building, NY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

City Beautiful Movement

A

Late 1800s, early 1900s in North America
Urban beautification
City monuments, monumentalism
Grand architecture
To promote harmony, social order
World’s Columbian Expedition 1893, Chicago.
Jane Jacobs, what might she think of this movement?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What did Jane Jacobs say about City Beautiful Movement?

A

“Architectural design cult”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Greenfield development ex

A

East Sector Study Area – Saskatoon 2011

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Brownfield Ex’s

A

(reclamation, redevelopment) ~ River Landing, Saskatoon

Vancouver Bc= Olympic Village

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Foodbank Canada=
_____ people relied on food handouts
Nearly ___ were children

___per cent of population living below low-income cutoff in 2011
Food bank users over ___% families with children
__% of food bank users currently employed additional __% recently employed

__% food bank users self identify as First Nations, Metis or Inuit

__% food bank users are new immigrants
Solutions

____ children in Canada are going hungry

Solutions?

A

833,000 people relied on food handouts (2013)
Nearly 1/3 were children
Foodbank usage now higher than before recession
Causes: low income jobs; loss of manufacturing jobs; barriers to EI and social assistance programs

8.8 per cent of population living below low-income cutoff in 2011
Food bank users over 50% families with children
12% of food bank users currently employed additional 5% recently employed

11% food bank users self identify as First Nations, Metis or Inuit
11% food bank users are new immigrants
Solutions? Food Bank Canada calls on Gov’t for affordable housing; better income supports; social investment in Northern Canada to solve food insecurity in the North
300,000 children in Canada are going hungry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Food Production in History(4)

A

Rural activity, farm production outside but in proximity to settlement
Urban industrialization, land values increase, spread of settlement
Agriculture pushed away from cities
Transportation industry develops
“4000 mile Caesar Salad”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Green Rev

A

Post WWII
Industrial chemicals, wartime technology
Food production accelerated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Urban Food Security: Canada

A 
Roof top gardens, greenhouses, composting, backyards, frontyards,
Permaculture
Alternative food distribution, foodshare
Farmers markets,  social capital
Community kitchens, food co-op
Organic produce delivery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Organic Food

A

Proximity (reality is 2,400 km ‘field to fork’)
Social capital (community gardens, Victory gardens)
Lower chemical inputs
Fair labour standards
Food awareness
Quality of product

28
Q

Food Desert and Ex:

A

Riversdale(desert) vs Briarwood

Relative exclusion from food access
Economic, physical barriers
Mobility barriers
Type of food options

an urban area in which it is difficult to buy affordable or good-quality fresh food.

29
Q

The Three S’ in food

A

Security: Availability of food to all people

Self Sufficiency: Local resources

Sovereignty: How food is produced, control of food system, agro-ecological production practices

30
Q

Greening the urban Environment(9 benefits)

A 
Save money
Regulate temperature
Conserve Water
Social interaction
Diversity wildlife/plants
Produce food
Reduce carbon footprint
Urban connection with nature
Enhance recreation, human health
31
Q

How is stormwater important?

A 
Urban, suburban and rural agricultural land use practices generate substantial surface run-off
Increased soil erosion
Sedimentation
Flooding
Water quality degradation
Loss of biodiversity
Aquifer depletion
Climate change
(local/regional heat islands)
32
Q

Runoff Rate=

Infiltration Rate=

A

function of (precipitation rate and infiltration rate)

function of (soil texture, soil moisture, vegetation cover

If rainfall=infiltration rate then no runoff
If rainfall>infiltration rate then runoff occurs

33
Q

Urbanization brings _____ surface flow, ____ interflow/baseflow, less interception, less transpiration

A

increased,less

34
Q

Storm Water systems before 1990’s

A

Objective: to provide drainage away from development; to control flood flows
Means: Structural methods, pipes, culverts, armour natural channels
Design Method: Size capacity based on 100 year return event
Financing/implementation: Public works funded by tax dollars

35
Q

Modern Storm Water Systems

A

Objective: on-site mitigation of storm flows; enhanced infiltration; support base and low flows of streams; protect/restore natural drainage channels
Means: Decentralized runoff control, bioengineering; swales; bioengineering; on-site retention of storm water
Design Method: Computer models; multi-function land uses; appropriate on-site measures

36
Q

Hastings Park Vancouver,BC

A

Good example of the progression of drainage systems and land recovery.

37
Q

Urban Form in the suburbs (post 1950)

A

Horizontal expanse of city population
Low density
One and two family dwellings, low rise apartments
Insulated neighbourhoods, small green spaces
Gridiron replaced with superblock
Loop streets, cul-de-sac
Don Mills, ON; Sherwood Park, AB (new towns)

38
Q

Gentrification

A 
From gentry (old English - high social class)
Return to urban core (1990s –today)
Cultural amenities
Older homes, character neighbourhoods
Renovations, restoration, heritage homes
Land values increase, rents increase
Long time residents may be displaced
Neighbourhood transitioning (Nutana, Broadway?)
39
Q

Mobility VS. Accessibility

A

Movement, distance between, private realm, social exclusion, ‘auto-mobility’
.ability to move between locations
Technology has reduced distance friction
Mobility is a function of (age, income, able body)
Traditional land use planning model has emphasized mobility, automobile mobility
Mobility deprivation (youth, elderly, under-employed, disabled)

Proximity, connectivity, public realm, social inclusion, transit
.Store front transit access
Bike lane access
Rear parking lots
Walk-in shops
40
Q

Mobility

A

Movement, distance between, private realm, social exclusion, ‘auto-mobility’

ability to move between locations
Technology has reduced distance friction
Mobility is a function of (age, income, able body)
Traditional land use planning model has emphasized mobility, automobile mobility
Mobility deprivation (youth, elderly, under-employed, disabled)

41
Q

Accessibility

A

Proximity, connectivity, public realm, social inclusion, transit

Store front transit access
Bike lane access
Rear parking lots
Walk-in shops

42
Q

Mobility Approach

A 
Land use separation 
Roadway development
Private automobile
Flexibility
High mobility rates
Relative low cost (excluding externalities)
43
Q

Post-1940 Mobility Approach(Auto mobility)

A

Automobile dependency (Newman and Kenworthy 1989)
Partly caused by poor land use planning
Partly by mobility-centric transportation planning (Freeway era)
Noise, water, air pollution, road rage
Accidents, injury, death
Pedestrian unfriendly landscapes
Mitigation: Traffic calming, mixed modes, mixed land uses (non-Euclidian zoning)

44
Q

TOD Ex

A

Transit Oriented Development=

Portland Oregon Metro
Peter Calthorpe=

Diversity: ethnicity, age, gender, housing, land use ….
Human scale, walkability, pedestrian friendly
Density: population/km2; Intensity (human interaction)
Complete neighbourhoods
Local destinations
Walk-ability
Human scale, pedestrian, bike, auto friendly (“Main Street”)

45
Q

Peter Calthorpe Ideas

A

Diversity: ethnicity, age, gender, housing, land use ….
Human scale, walkability, pedestrian friendly
Density: population/km2; Intensity (human interaction)
Complete neighbourhoods
Local destinations
Walk-ability
Human scale, pedestrian, bike, auto friendly (“Main Street”)

46
Q

World View Paradims(5)

A
  1. Frontier Economics=Pre 1960’s
    .Resource extraction, economy only, traditional academic subjects , silo effect
  2. Resource Managament=1970’s
    .Environmental protection as add-on, humans over environment,
  3. Sustatinable Development=1980’s-Now
  4. Selective Environmentalism=1970’s
    .Environmental protection when convenient, political priorities
  5. Deep Ecology=1960’s
    . Ecology only, economics irrelevant, traditional academic subjects, silo effect
47
Q

Critique of SD

A

In the definition: ‘needs’ versus ‘wants’
Hold back less developed world?
Different interpretations, eg. ‘Strong’ versus ‘weak’ sustainability
Vagueness of term, overuse?
Ignores politics of the environment
How to measure, quantify?

48
Q

Strong SD

A

must retain same natural capital inventory for next generation

49
Q

Weak SD

A

replacements, new technology, pricing to overcome depletion

50
Q

Problems with Weak SD

A 
Nuclear (carbon emissions free, BUT .. expensive, waste storage problems, safety)
Hybrid vehicles (reduced fossil fuel, but …)
51
Q

Jevons Principle

A

1865 Coal Burning Assessment in the UK
Depletion of UK coal reserves; also coal smog/fog/human health conditions
“improved coal burning technology would raise efficiency, save coal resources”
Jevons predicted that increased efficiency would lead to more users, increased coal consumption … he was right!

EX: Los Angeles Smog=30 years

52
Q

Jevons Principle EX

A

EX: Los Angeles Smog=30 years

53
Q

Renewable Resource

A

(a resource forming continually within a human lifetime)

54
Q

non-renewable resource

A

(a resource unlikely to replenish in n a human lifetime)

55
Q

Anthropocentric View

A

defines a “resource” as useful to people (trees, fish, minerals)

56
Q

Ecology and 3 Parts

A

3 basic parts: atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere (air, water, land)

Systems approach, holistic, integrated, adaptable, flexible

57
Q

Traditional Resource Management(Non-ecosystem approach)

A 
People and actions separate from nature
Fragmentation of science
Emphasis on single resource use
No consideration of cumulative impacts
Human capacity to manage over nature
Reacting to problems, not anticipating
58
Q

Ecosystem Approach

A 
Holistic, interactions
Humans as part of nature (not over)
Diversity, resilience
Global water cycle includes human use
Cultural component considered
Importance of actors, stakeholders
59
Q

Urban impacts and ecosystem approach

A

Re)imagining ‘nature’
Citizen engagement
Awareness of economy, ecology, social linkages
Cultural amenities
Built environment, civic pride, architecture
Cities as an urban ecosystem

60
Q

Greyfield Opportunities and Challenges

A

Transit essential to support retrofits
300 metre buffers on watercourses
Daylight streams, introduce permeable surfaces
Re-greening, vegetation and food production
Improved architecture in retrofits
Public support for more retrofits
Transfer development rights to transit corridors

61
Q

Reburbia

A

Redesigning/Retrofitting

suburbia

62
Q

Hastings park, Vancouver Date

A

1960s-1990s

Greyfield restoration

63
Q

Ellen Dunham-Jones

Retrofitting Suburbia

A 
Key consequences of suburbia=
. Health
. Affordability
. Climate Change
. demographic shift
. underperforming    asphalt

.Transit is a key contributor to retrofitting
.Pockets of walkability provide huge help to underperforming areas

64
Q

Reinhabitation

A

Using a formerly closed building(ex: mall) for other uses such as libraries, schools, art galleries.

65
Q

Pre-Conditions for sprawl

A
  • Car Availability
  • Home Ownership
  • Post-WW2 demand for housing
  • Mass building of roads
66
Q

The Planning and Development Act: Saskatchewan

A

The purposes of this Act are the following:
(a) to establish the planning and development system in the province;
(b) to identify provincial interests that guide provincial and municipal planning decisions in the development of communities;
(c) to support the development of environmentally, economically, socially and culturally sustainable communities;
(d) to enable co-operation between municipalities, planning districts and other jurisdictions and agencies in the delivery of planning services and
infrastructure development with communities;
(e) to provide for public participation in the planning process;
(f) to provide equitable dispute resolution and appeal processes.

67
Q

Legislative vs. Judicial

A

Legislative is city council

judicial is judges

Y2 T1 Geography 240 (4 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions