CH 3 Flashcards

1
Q

*measurement

A

assigning # or symbol in characteristics of objects according to specific rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1 to 1 correspondence

A

btw # and characteristics being measured standardizes rules to assign number and apply uniformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

rules must not change

A

after object or time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

*scaling

A

erecting continue upon which measured objects created

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

description

A

unique labels or descirptors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

order

A

relative size or position of descriptors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

distance

A

abolsute difference between scale descriptors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

orign

A

unique or fixed begning or true zero

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

*nominal

A

labeling/scales that partition data into mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive categories i.e. brand A B C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

*ordinal

A

heir achy (but can’t tell specifically how much more or how much less) i.e. rank orders, rank these things in order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

*interval

A

arbitrary no true zero equal distance correlation i.e. on a scale from 1 to 7..

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

*ratio

A

meaningful zero, all stat techniques can be applies i.e. age or income level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

rationality

A

can tell how they relate zero (CAN TELL ONLY IN RATIO)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

**Comparative scales

A

involved direct comparison of two stimulus only ordinal properties (paired comparison, rank,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

*paired compairsion

A

two objects & asked to select one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

*rank order

A

several objects present and asked to order according to some criteria i.e. rank toothpaste

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

*constant sum

A

constant sum of units i.e. 100 points of attributes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

*q-sort

A

sort relativity large amounts of objects into bins according to some criteria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

*itemized

A

scale w descriptors for each category

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

*continuous

A

rate object by posing mark at appropriate position on line

21
Q

*likert

A

strongly dis to strongly agree scale - neutral most likely to switch brnads

22
Q

*sematic

A

seven point raitng

23
Q

*staple

A

vertical scale ten categories from -5 to 5

24
Q

*balanced scale

A

extremely good, v good, good, somewhat good, bad, v bad, extremely bad

25
Q

*unbalanced scale

A

extreme good, v good, bad, v bad

26
Q

develop multiple items scale

A
  1. detemerine what u r going 2 measure 2. generate as many items as possible 3. ask experts to eval 4. determine attitudinal scale to be used 5. include items to validate scale 6. administer to initial sample (PRETEST) 7. Eval + refine items 8. optimize scale length
27
Q

itemized scale descions

A

categories, balanced, odd.even, physical form

28
Q

*reliability

A

event to which measures are free from random error

29
Q

*test-retest

A

same scale device, same sample, same conditions

30
Q

*alt-forms

A

btw 2 equivalent forms, but same subject

31
Q

split-half

A

btw equivalent group of items responses in multi item measurement device

32
Q

split-half

A

btw equivalent group of items responses in multi item measurement device

33
Q

internal consistency reliability

A

extent to which summated parts of scale are consistent about characteristics being measured

34
Q

coefficient alpha

A

average of all possible split half coefficents

35
Q

***validity

A

extent measurement free from systematic error

36
Q

content (face) validity

A

subjective but systematic eval of how well content represents measurement task at hand

37
Q

*citerion

A

reflects if scale performs as expected

38
Q

*construct

A

addresses construct of what the scale is measure i.e. brand loyalty

39
Q

*convergent validity

A

scales correlate positily

40
Q

*discriminate validit

A

scales do not correlate possitivly

41
Q

*nomological

A

scales correlate in theoretically predicted ways in the measure of the different but related constructs

42
Q

predictive validity

A

compares current w predicted measurements

43
Q

concurrent valdiity

A

compares two different measurements at the same point in time from the same theme

44
Q

if a measure is perfectly valid

A

it is also relaible

45
Q

if a measure is unrelaible

A

not valid

46
Q

reliable measuer

A

may or may not be valid

47
Q

**reliability is a necessity but

A

but not sufficient condition for validity

48
Q

select a scale based on

A

reliability, sensibility, geralizability, relevance