Cases Flashcards

1
Q

Indefinite detention of suspected international terrorists

A

A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2004)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Example of Parliament passing a law which conferred an exceptionally wide power on state officials

A

Inland Revenue Commissioners and Anothet v Rossminster Ltd and others (1980)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Entick v Carrington (1765)

A

Case that demonstrates all of Dicey’s propositions regarding the rule of law:

1) the state tried unsuccessfully to use a power in the form of a warrant which had no legal origin. -> couldn’t lawfully negate the common law right not to be trespassed against without lawful justification
2) the state was held to account according to the ordinary law before the ordinary courts
3) a court-based constitution: ordinary courts provided Entick with a practical remedy against the state in the law of trespass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

M v Home Office (1994)

A

Everyone is equal under the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Example of everyone is equal under the law

A

M v Home Office (1994)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Anderson v Gorries (1895)

A

Judges are not liable for anything said while carrying out their judicial function
-> protection of judicial independence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case that demonstrates Dicey’s propositions of rule of law

A

Entick v Carrington (1765)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Prospective legislation instead of retrospective

A

Waddington v Miah (1974)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Waddington v Miah (1974)

A

Prospective legislation instead of retrospective (HUOM: WAR CRIMES ACT 1991 which is clearly retrospective)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Principle of legality

A

Ex parte Simms and another (1999)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ex parte Simms and another (1999)

A

The principle of legality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly