Aggression and Antisocial Behavior Flashcards

1
Q

Definitions. Any action that delivers noxious stimuli to another organism vs any action intended to harm or injure another living being who is motivated to avoid such treatment.

A

Behavioral Definition of Aggression vs Intentional Definition of Aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types. Aggressive acts for which the perpetrator’s main goal is to gain access to objects, space, or privileges (I want to get something from you, I’m going to use aggression to get that) VS Aggressive acts in which the perpetrator’s main goal is to harm or injure a victim
(I want to be aggressive)

A

Instrumental Aggression vs Hostile Aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Instinct theory. we all have aggression inside of us.
Need to discharge aggressive energy before it builds up too much, healthy people will discharge in a healthy way, unhealthy people will discharge the aggression in an unhealthy way (fighting)
Aggressive drives are adaptive - help satisfy basic needs and promote life

A

Psychoanalytic Instinct Theory of Aggression (Freud)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Instinct theory. Aggression ensures the survival of the individual and the species

  • Disperse population - better for all of us to survive if we spread out more - Protect young: mother animals aggressively protect their babies
  • Stronger males fight and win females: produce strong babies
  • Humans kill each other because their aggression is poorly controlled
A

Lorenz’s Ethological Instinct Theory of Aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Critique of — Theories. Peaceful tribes of people, empathy (a powerful inhibitor of aggression.. can use language to end disputes), Children end disputes w/o aggression, aggression can be wiped out

A

Instinct Theories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Type of theory of aggression - Dollard et al. (1939): Frustration/Aggression Hypothesis -
Frustration triggers aggression and all aggressive acts can be traced to frustration AND Berkowitz’s (1965) Revised Frustration/Agression Hypothesis-
Frustration make us angry and creates a readiness for aggressive acts. There must be an aggressive cue to trigger aggression

A

Goal-Driven Theories of Aggression (Learning Theories)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Goal-Driven Theory of Aggression (Learning Theory). Frustration triggers aggression and all aggressive acts can be traced to frustration. Dollard et al. (1939)

A

Frustration/Aggression Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A Goal-Driven Theory of Aggression (Learning Theory). Frustration make us angry and creates a readiness for aggressive acts. There must be an aggressive cue to trigger aggression. Berkowitz’s (1965)

A

Revised Frustration/Agression Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Theory. Aggression responses are acquired in two ways: Observational Learning and Direct experience. Bobo dolls - all groups learned the behaviors, but model-punshied were much less aggressive

A

Bandura’s Social Learning Theory of Aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Theory. Maintains aggression: to satisfy other goals, terminate other noxious behaviors, socially sanctioned to be aggressive to peers, intrinsically rewarding for aggressors

A

Bandura’s Social Learning Theory of Aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Types of aggressive children: Highly aggressive children
Think aggressive acts are easy to perform
Rely on aggression as means of solving social problems or achieving personal objectives

High levels of hostile, retaliatory aggression
reaction, defensive mechanism, most people can come up with non-aggressive strategies but these kids jump to aggression

A

Proactive and Reactive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Part of Social Information Processing Model. - - Bias. View harm done under ambiguous circumstances as having stemmed from a hostile intent on the part of the harm-doer
- Characteristic of reactive aggressors

A

Hostile Attribution Bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hostile Attribution Bias - show in this - - - Model

  1. Encoding: take in information
  2. Interpretation: make sense of information and decide what caused other person’s behavior
  3. Clarification of Goals: decide what you want to achieve in situation
  4. Response Search: think of possible actions to achieve goal
  5. Response Decision: weigh pros and cons of each alternative
  6. Behavioral Enactment: Do it!
A

Social Information Processing Model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Aggression in - Not aggressive, occasionally try to overpower peer for attractive peer

A

Aggression in Infancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Aggression in - Unfocused temper tantrums diminish and are uncommon after age 4. Aggression peaks between 2-3 and gradually declines over preschool period. 2-3 year olds are more likely to be physically aggressive - instrumentally in nature

A

Aggression in Preschool

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Aggression in - Physical aggression declines, better able to interpret other’ behavioral intention, retaliatory aggression (aggressive acts elicited by real or imagined provocations. More likely to view this type of aggression as normal or acceptable)

A

Aggression in Grade School

17
Q

Prevalence of - in the US. 29.9% involved in bullying. 12% as the - and 10% as the -. More found in males more than females (males are physical and verbal, females are verbal-taunting)

A

Bullying

18
Q

Characteristics of -

  • More trouble making friends
  • Poor relationships with others
  • Greater loneliness
  • Socially isolated and lack social skills
  • Greater parental involvement in school
  • Less frequency in alcohol and cigarette use
A

Bullying Victims

19
Q

Characteristics of -
-More likely to be involved in problem behaviors (drinking, smoking etc.)
-Poor school adjustment (poor achievement) often struggling in school
-no motivation to achieve
Greater was of making friends (not socially isolated)
Birds of a feather flock together - gangs of bullies that are all friends

A

Characteristics of Bullies

20
Q

Characteristics of -

  • Especially high risk group
  • shows the most problems in developmental outcomes
  • Socially isolated
  • passive and shy
  • Poor school achievement
  • Involved in problem behaviors
A

Characteristics of teens who report being both bullies and victims

21
Q
    • Offenders: No antisocial problems prior to adolescence, and none continue into adulthood, Minor crimes (truancy, vandalism, shoplifting ect)

– Offenders Problems in childhood, and problems continue into adulthood, Major crimes (rape, robbery, murder, etc), Make up a large portion of the major crimes committed

A

Adolescence-Limited Offenders, Lifecourse-Persistent Offenders

22
Q
    • of Gender Differences. 4 reasons: 1. Males are more aggressive in almost every society 2. Reliables differences are found early (2-2.5 years), so its hard to say it is learned/socialized 3. Great Apes also show more aggressive males 4. More aggression can be attributed to more testosterone
A

Biological View of Gender Differnces

23
Q
      • of Gender Differences. Parents play rougher with boys than girls, encourage aggression in boys and talk about feelings with girls. Parents react more negatively to aggression from girls, toys for boys tend to have more aggressive themes
A

Social Learning viewpoint of gender differences

24
Q
      • of Gender Differences. Sex-linked constitutional factors (biology) interact with social-environmental influences to promote sex differences in aggression. Biological predispositions affect the behaviors of caregivers, which elicit reactions from the child (evocative effects)
A

Interactive (Biosocial) Viewpoint

25
Q

Disruptive behavior disorders - Pattern of opposition, disobedience, and defiance that usually leads to conflicts with parents, siblings, teachers, and peers
Requires presence of 4 negative or hostile behaviors

A

Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD)

26
Q

Disruptive behavior disorders - Encompasses other disorder’s behaviors but also includes repeated violations of basic rights of others and of social norms, standards, and rules
Includes: aggression to people/animals, destruction of property, deceitfulness or theft, serious violation of rules
Biologically based - body doesn’t respond to threat of harm physiologically don’t have the response, easier for them to do these terrible things - no empathy, no taking on the pain of others

A

Conduct Disorder

27
Q

Reasons — children exhibit more aggression: parents more likely to rely on physical punishment, more stress in the family, few community support structures

A

Lower Socioeconomic Status children exhibit more aggression

28
Q

-‘s relation to Aggression. Cold/rejection or power-asserive discipline (physical) result in more aggressive children. Willingness to tolerate children’s aggressiveness, temperamental impulsivitiy, because of the - that they receive

A

Parenting’s relation to Aggression.

29
Q

Controlling agression Techniques. Vent your anger on a inanimate object, create play areas that minimize likeness of conflict

A

Controlling aggression: does not work

30
Q

Controlling aggression techniques. Incompatible-response: adults ignore undesirable conduct while reinforcing acts that are incompatible with these responses. Child doesn’t act out for attention, they get attention for being good. Time out technique

A

Controlling Aggression: actually works