Sociology-Education-Educational Policy and Inequality Flashcards
What was the first education system?
The tripartite system from 1944 (1944 Education Act)
What did the education system begin to focus on?
The idea of meritocracy
What is the tripartite system?
Where children were selected and allocated into one of three types of secondary school (grammar, secondary modern and technical), according to their aptitudes and abilities based on the 11+ exam
What were the grammar schools?
Offered an academic curriculum and access to non-manual jobs and higher education. They were for pupils with academic ability who passed the 11+. Pupils were mainly middle class
What were secondary modern schools?
Offered a non-academic ‘practical’ curriculum and access to manual work for pupils who failed the 11+. These pupils were mainly working class
What were technical schools?
They only existed in a few areas, so it was more of a bipartite system than a tripartite system
How did the system fail at promoting meritocracy?
It reproduced class inequality by channeling the two social classes into two different types of school and offered unequal opportunities, and reproduced gender inequality by requiring girls to gain a higher pass mark to get into a grammar school
How did the tripartite system legitimise inequality?
Through the ideology that ability is born. It was argued that ability could be measured early on in life through the 11+ when in reality children’s environment greatly affects their chances of success
what education system came after the tripartite system?
The comprehensive system from 1965
What did the comprehensive system aim to do?
Overcome the class divide of the tripartite system and make education more meritocratic, and so abolished the 11+, grammar schools and secondary modern schools
What schools did the comprehensive system introduce?
Comprehensive schools that all pupils within the area would attend. However it was left to the local education authority to decide whether to change to comprehensive schools and not all did, so the grammar-secondary modern divide still exists in some areas
How do functionalists view the comprehensive system?
As promoting social integration by bringing children of different social classes together in one school, and is more meritocratic as it gives pupils a longer period in which to develop and show their abilities
How does Ford 1969 criticise the functionalist view of the comprehensive system?
Found little social mixing between working class and middle class pupils, mainly because of streaming
How do marxists view the comprehensive system?
Argue it isn’t meritocratic and instead reproduces class inequality through generations through continuation of streaming and labelling, which denies working class children equal opportunity. By not selecting children at 11, there is a myth of meritocracy by making unequal achievement seem just and fair, as it makes failure seem to be the result of the individual, not the system
What is marketisation?
It refers to the process of introducing market forces of consumer choice and competition between suppliers into areas run by the state, such as education
How has marketisation created an ‘education market’?
By reducing direct state control over education, and increasing both competition between schools and parental choice of school
When did marketisation become a central theme of government education policy?
Since the 1988 education Reform Act, introduced by the Conservative government of Margaret Thatcher
What happened from 1997?
New Labour government followed similar policies, emphasising standards, diversity and choice
What happened from 2010?
Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government took marketisation further by creating academies and free schools
Why do neoliberals and the new right favour marketisation?
Argue that it means schools have to attract customers by competing with each other in the market. Schools that provide customers with what they want will thrive, and those that don’t will ‘go out of business’
What policies promote marketisation/parentocracy?
Publication of league tables and Ofsted reports, business sponsorship of schools, open enrolment, specialist schools, formula funding, schools being allowed to opt out of local authority control, schools having to compete to attract pupils, tuition fees for higher education, allowing parents/others to set up free schools
What does David 1993 describe?
Describes marketised education as a parentocracy
What do supporters of marketisation argue?
That in an education market, power shifts away from the producers to the consumers. They claim this encourages diversity among schools, giving parents more choice and raises standards
What do critics of marketisation argue?
It has increased inequalities