Judicial Decision-Making Flashcards

1
Q

What is circumstantial evidence?

A

Evidence which even if accepted, provides only a basis from which a material fact can be inferred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is direct evidence?

A

Evidence from an eye witness that, if accepted, immediately proves a fact material to a party’s case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is meant by the “standard of proof”?

A

The degree of certainty or belief that is required of a fact-finder for a party’s version of facts to be accepted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give an example of a criminal trial where the standard of evidence has to be “beyond reasonable doubt”?

A

Darken v. The Queen 2006.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give an example of a case which the standard of proof, that being “beyond reasonable doubt” can become problematic?

A

Victor v. Nebraska 1994.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give an example of a civil matter (case) where the standard of evidence has to be proven “on the balance of probabilities”?

A

Davis v. Taylor 1974.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the “Briginshaw” standard of proof?

A

In a civil matter, where a decision will affect the livelihood of a person, the standard of evidence has to be proven to a “higher standard of proof” and that the judge must “feel an actual persuasion of its occurance”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which types of evidence are examples of primary evidence?

A

Direct Evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which types of evidence are examples of secondary evidence?

A

Circumstantial Evidence.

Hearsay Evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the “Doctrine of Double Jeopardy”?

A

If a defendant has been tried for an offence and convicted or acquitted, they should not be exposed to the further jeopardy of a fresh prosecution arising out of the same facts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How can a court avoid precedents?

A
  • The precedent is distinguishable on its facts.
  • The statement of law in the earlier case is too wide and should be confined to its facts.
  • The statement in the earlier case is obiter dictum rather than ratio decidendi.
  • The precedent should not be applied due to changed social conditions.
  • The precedent was unsatisfactory.
  • The precedent was wrongly decided.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly