Week 5 Grice's Maxims Flashcards

1
Q

Indirect speech acts

A
“Do you have any money on you?”
meaning
“I don't have any money;
can I borrow some from you?”
How do we work out what this utterance really means = CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE

A

The utterance (“Do you have any money on you?”) =
additional message which Grice (1967) called a conversational
implicature.
- arrive thru process of INFERENCE based on UNDERSTANDING of RULES governing SUCCESSFUL CONVERSATIONAL INTERACTION

  1. usual ling meaning
  2. CONTEXTual info (shared knowledge)
  3. assumption speaker obeying: CO-OP PRINC.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cooperative Principle

A

Make Conversational Contribution:

  • AS REQuired
  • AT STAGE which it occurs
  • BY ACCEPTED PURPOSE/DIRECTION
  • Of TALK EXCHANGE

GENERAL: Mutually Engaged w Listener in Activity which Benefit BOTH

RULES: 4 CONVERSATIONAL MAXIMS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Conversational Maxims

A
  • RELATION: be relevant
  • QUANTITY: not too much/too little (overexplain/omitt)
  • QUALITY: say truth/support it
  • MANNER: Clear: Brief, ordely, /no/ obscurity + ambiguity

> > maxims HIGHLY culturally bound
>notions of ‘relevance’, ‘clarity’,
‘informativeness’ etc. may be culturally bound.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

obeying maxims

A

normal convo - cooperateive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

flouting maxims

A

maxim DELIBERATELY disobeyed, w/ INTENTION hearer recognise that this is the case

=

INDIRECT SPEECH ACTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

violating maxims

A
  • not relevant
  • too much/omit
  • lie
  • RARE, because we need them for convo, or only happens in intercultural context sometimes by accident
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

flouting quality

A

• (The Maxim of Quality: Say only what you believe to be true and
adequately supported)
• “What a wonderful neighbourhood.” (about slum)
• A deliberate falsehood for rhetorical effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

flouting quantity

A

(The Maxim of Quantity: Be only as informative as required for
current conversational purposes)
• A book review …
“This first novel is well bound and is remarkably free of typographical errors. …”
IE: “It’s garbage …”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

flouting manner

A

• (The Maxim of Manner: Be clear: be brief and orderly and avoid
obscurity and ambiguity)
• a reference …

VAGUE VAGUE
• “Mr. Jones is given to the presumptive.”
This is vague (I’d have to look up the word!) and pretty unhelpful as it
stands. You’d infer that the speaker doesn’t like Mr Jones and doesn’t want
to say very much.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

flouting relevance

A

• (The Maxim of Relation: Be relevant)
A. ‘What on earth has happened to the roast beef?’
B. ‘The dog is looking very happy.’
IE: The dog ate the roast…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Indirect speech acts

A
  • acts that DEPEND (for their interpretation) on HEARER’s ability to RECOGNISE cooperative principle = deliberately breached
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly