Robbery - Case Law Flashcards

1
Q

Case law relating to

Claim of right?

A

R v Skivington

Theft is an ingredient of robbery. If a man has an honest belief in a claim of right to the property then that negates the element of theft and without proof of theft the full offence is not made out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Case law relating to

taking

A

R v Lapier

Robbery is complete the instant the property is taken, even if possession is only momentary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Case law relating to

possession

A

R v Cox

Possession involves two elements. The first being the physical element which is actual or potential physical custody or control and the second is the mental element which is the combination of knowledge in a sense of awareness that the substance is in their possession and an intention to exercise possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Case law relating to

accompanied by

A

R v Maihi

It is implicit that in accompany that there must be a connection or link between the act of stealing and a threat of violence. Both must be present but it is not required that the act of stealing and threat of violence be contemporaneous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Case law relating to

violence

A

Peneha v Police

It is sufficient that the actions of the defendant forcibly interfered with personal freedom or amounted to forcible, powerful or violent action or motion producing a very marked or powerful effect tending to cause bodily injury or discomfort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case law relating to

GBH

A

DPP v SMITH

Bodily harm needs no explanation and grievous means no more and no less then really serious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case law relating to

Physical proximity

A

R v Joyce

The crown must establish that at least two persons were physically present at the time the robbery was committed or the assault occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case law relating to

Joint enterprise

A

R v Galey

Being together in the context of s235(b) involves two or more persons having the common intention to use their combined force, either in any event or as circumstances might require, directly in the perpetration of the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly