Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Law > Theft and Robbery > Flashcards

Theft and Robbery Flashcards

1
Q

In what section of what act is theft defined?

A

S1(1) of the Theft Act 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of theft?

A

‘Dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive the other of it’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What section defines appropriation?

A

S3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the definition of appropriation?

A

Any assumption by a person of the rights of another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the leading case for appropriation?

A

R v Morris

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the legal principle from R v Morris?

A

It is enough to prove that D has assumed one right of the owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the legal principle from Lawrence v MPC?

A

Even if V consents, there can still be an appropriation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the legal principle from R v Hinks?

A

Acceptance of a valid gift may sometimes amount to an appropriation (If D knows they are taking advantage of V)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why did the defendants actions amount to an appropriation in R v Pitham v Hehl?

A

Because they had assumed the rights of the owner to sell the furniture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does S3(1) of TA say?

A

An appropriation also includes where D initially comes across property innocently but later assumes a right by keeping it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What section defines ‘property’?

A

S4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does S4(1) state that property includes?

A

Money, Real property, Personal Property, Things in action, Other intangible property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What section of TA discusses real property?

A

S4(2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In general, can land be stolen?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In what 3 ways can real property be stolen?

A

Severing part of the land from the land, A tenant taking a fixture or fitting from the land let to him, Someone legally entrusted to look after the land abuses his power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does S4(3) of TA discuss?

A

Wild plants, flowers, mushrooms etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Are wild plants considered property?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Under what exception are wild plants, flowers and mushrooms considered property?

A

If they are picked for sale, reward or other commercial purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What does S4(4) of TA discuss?

A

Wild creatures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Are wild creatures property which can be stolen?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Under what exception can a wild creature be stolen?

A

If they have been tamed, are ordinarily kept in captivity or have been reduced into someone’s possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What case states that corpses do not generally amount to property?

A

Kelly v Lindsay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

In what instance can a corpse be stolen?

A

If they have been altered for medical examination, art or educational purposes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Do bodily fluids amount to property?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Which case outlines bodily fluid amounting to property?

A

R v Welsh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Which case states that information and knowledge cannot be stolen?

A

Oxford v Moss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

In which case was D convicted of theft for stealing the physical exam papers?

A

R v Akbar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Which section of TA outlines ‘belonging to another’?

A

S5(1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What is ‘belonging to another’ defined as?

A

Where a person has possession or control of property or a proprietary right/interest (e.g. Ownership), the property belongs to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What is the key case for ‘belonging to another’?

A

R v Turner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What is the legal principle which came out of R v Turner?

A

Even the legal owner of property is capable of stealing his own property if it’s in the possession or control of someone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What are the brief case facts of Ricketts v Basildon Magistrates?

A

D had taken donated clothes from Oxfam clothes banks and from BHF doorstep claiming that they belonged to no one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Why was D in Ricketts v Basildon convicted of theft?

A

Because the clothes in the clothes bank belonged to Oxfam and the clothes outside of BHF still belonged to the owner as BHF hadn’t taken them inside yet

34
Q

What does S5(3) of TA 1968 state?

A

If D receives property and is under obligation to use it in a certain way, that property still belongs to another

35
Q

What is the leading case for S5(3) of TA?

A

Davidge v Burnett

36
Q

Why was D is Davidge v Burnett convicted of theft?

A

Because she had a legal obligation to use the money for the gas bill

37
Q

What does S5(4) of TA 1968 state?

A

Where D receives property by mistake, he is under obligation to return it to the owner

38
Q

What case demonstrated S5(4) of TA 1968?

A

Attorney General’s reference (No1 of 1983)

39
Q

What type of transactions does S5(4) not include?

A

Betting transactions - no legal obligation is created

40
Q

What does S2 not provide for ‘dishonesty’?

A

Doesn’t provide a definition of dishonesty but instead gives 3 exceptions where D has not been dishonest

41
Q

What does S2(1)(a) of TA 1968 state?

A

D is not dishonest if HE BELIEVES he has a legal right to deprive the other of the property

42
Q

What is the case that demonstrates S2(1)(a) of TA 1968?

A

Robinson

43
Q

Why had D in the case of Robinson not been dishonest?

A

He believed he had a legal right to the money as it was owed to him

44
Q

What does S2(1)(b) of TA 1968 state?

A

D has not been dishonest if HE BELIEVES that the owner would consent to the appropriation if they knew of it and it’s circumstances

45
Q

Which case demonstrates S2(1)(b) of TA 1968?

A

Holden

46
Q

Why had D in the case of Holden not been dishonest?

A

Because he had seen others do this and therefore believed that his employer would’ve consented

47
Q

What does S2(1)(c) of TA 1968 state?

A

D has not been dishonest if HE BELIEVES the owner cannot be found by taking reasonable steps

48
Q

Which case demonstrates S2(1)(c) of TA 1968?

A

Small

49
Q

Why had D in the case of Small not been dishonest?

A

Because he didn’t believe that he could’ve found the owner

50
Q

What does S2(2) of TA 1968 state?

A

D may still be dishonest even though he is willing to pay for property

51
Q

Which case outlines the test which must be proven for dishonesty?

A

R v Ghosh

52
Q

Outline the Ghosh test

A

1) D’s conduct would be considered dishonest to the reasonable and honest man, AND
2) D was aware of this

53
Q

Which section of TA 1968 outlines ‘intention to permanently deprive’?

A

S6

54
Q

Which section and sub-section defines ‘intention to permanently deprive?

A

S6(1)

55
Q

What is the definition of ‘intention to permanently deprive’?

A

Intending to treat the property as one’s own to dispose of (ie deal with) regardless of the owner’s rights

56
Q

Why was D in DPP v Lavender intending to permanently deprive?

A

By moving the doors from one flat to another, D was treating them as if they were his

57
Q

Why was D in R v Velumyl intending to permanently deprive?

A

Although D planned to replace the bank noted,he had intended to deprive his employer of those exact notes

58
Q

Why had D in R v Warner not intended to permanently deprive?

A

Because he had only intended to temporarily deprive V of his tools (ie borrow them)

59
Q

What does S6(1) say in regards to borrowing?

A

Borrowing can amount to an intent to permanently deprive is property is kept for such time and in such circumstances that make it equivalent to an outright taking/disposal

60
Q

When can borrowing amount to an intention to permanently deprive?

A

If the ‘goodness, value and virtue’ have been removed

61
Q

Why had D in R v Lloyd not intended to permanently deprive?

A

Because he had returned the film before it was missed and in it’s original condition

62
Q

What legal principle came out of R v Easom?

A

That conditional intent will not suffice for intention to permanently deprive

63
Q

Where is robbery defined?

A

S8 of TA 1968

64
Q

Define robbery

A

‘A person is guilty of robbery if he steals, and immediately before or at the time of doing so, and in order to steal, he uses force on any person or puts or seeks to put any person in fear of being then and there subjected to force’

65
Q

What are the actus reus components of robbery?

A

Completed theft
Use or threat of force on any person
Immediately before or at the time
In order to steal

66
Q

What are the mens rea components of robbery?

A

Mens rea of theft

Intention to use/threaten force in order to steal

67
Q

Which cases outlines that there must be a completed theft for a robbery?

A

R v Robinson

Corcoran v Anderton

68
Q

Was there a complete theft in R v Robinson and why/why not?

A

There wasn’t a completed theft because there was no dishonesty

69
Q

What legal principle came out of Corcoran v Anderton?

A

Theft may be complete even if the thief doesn’t take possession of the property

70
Q

What can amount to ‘force’ and which case outlines this?

A

A nudge, R v Dawson and James

71
Q

What came out of the case of RP and others v DPP?

A

Taking a cigarette out of a person’s mouth cannot amount to ‘force’

72
Q

What legal principle came out of the case R v Clouden?

A

That force can be applied to the person via the property (ie indirectly)

73
Q

What can D not threaten force on?

A

Property (eg V’s house)

74
Q

What legal principle came out of Smith v Desmond?

A

That D does not have to use force on the actual victim

75
Q

Which case outlines that force has to be used at the time or immediately before theft?

A

R v Hale

76
Q

Which case outlines that force must be used in order to steal?

A

R v Lockley

77
Q

What type of mens rea must D have to be convicted of Robbery?

A

Intention

78
Q

Which case outlines intention for robbery?

A

R v Mohan

79
Q

What must D have intention to do?

A

To use/threaten force in order to steal

80
Q

Which case outlines that V need not be scared of D or D’s conduct?

A

B and R v DPP

Law (25 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions