Lawsons Rules Flashcards

1
Q

Consent

A
  1. The π (legal and reasonably capable of consent)
  2. By words or conduct have made the ∆ reasonably understand that the
  3. π freely and knowingly consents to expose themselves to ∆ conduct, ∆ will bear no liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Negligence

A
  1. Duty
  2. Breach
  3. Causation
  4. Damages [Compensatory]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Negligent conduct creates.. .

A

A

  1. Reasonably foreseeable
  2. Unreasonable risk of harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When is a risk unreasonable?

A

When its magnitude and probablity outweighs the burden of avoidance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Trespass to chattel

A

1) Unauthorized
2) Intermeddling, w/ chattel
3) Harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intent

A

1) Purpose

2) Substantially certain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Transferred Intent

A

if different IT against same person, the same IT against

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Recaption

A

Privilege to use minimum force against actual wrongdoer that has taken by fraud or with constructive or actual force. Requires fresh pursuit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Assault

A

1) Reasonable apprehension of
2) Imminent
3) Harmful or offensive contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

False Imprisonment

A

1) Intentionally cause
2) complete confinement
3) that the π is aware of
4) by the boundaries of ∆ making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Defense to intention tort involving personal injuries

A

1) Express consent
a) mistake
b) fraud
c) duress
2) Implied consent
a) Emergency
b) athletic competition
c) mutual consent to combat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Self Defense (3)

A
  1. Reasonable force
  2. Reasonably believes
  3. Even if reasonably mistaken
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The usual standard of care (3)

A
  1. The care expected of a reasonable person
  2. Of ordinary precedence
  3. Under the circumstance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Professional Standard of Care (3)

A
  1. To utilize the skill and judgment of a member of that
  2. Profession (specialty) in good standing
  3. In the same circumstances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Informed consent

A

• Full disclosure of all material risks incident to treatment must be made
○ Materiality standard - risks, nature, alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Common law negligence

A

If act has been found to be negligent, and ∆ commits act, then negligent as a matter of law. (E.g. railroad x-ing)

17
Q

Statutory Tort

A

Statutes explicitly provides that a person harmed by specific conduct is entitled to relief

18
Q

Negligence per se

A
  1. The unexcused
  2. violation of a statute enacted to protect
  3. a class of persons of which the plaintiff is a member
  4. from the type of harm the plaintiff suffered
  5. is negligent per se
  6. Unless the court concludes with good reason application would be inappropriate
19
Q

Res Ipsa Locquitor (2)

A

Even without specifying what the ∆ did negligently, the π may proceed if

  1. This type of accident does not ordinarily occur (>50%)in the absence of negligence, and
  2. ∆ was in exclusive control
  3. π did not in any way cause harm
20
Q

Cause in Fact (2)

A

1) But-for rule

2) Substantial-factor test (Material)

21
Q

Failure To Act

A

One does not have a duty to intervene in a situation created by someone else

22
Q

Duty to warn

A

If patient poses serious danger of violence, doctor bears duty to warn (especially if you have a narrow class of people). Also, infectious diseases, prescription medication

23
Q

Privileges (defenses to intentional torts) [8]

A
  1. Consent
  2. Self
  3. Others
  4. Property
  5. Recovery
  6. Necessity
  7. Law
  8. Discipline
24
Q

Recovery of Property (2)

A
  1. Recapture

2. Shopkeeper’s privilege

25
Q

Public necessity (5)

A
  1. Privileged to intentionally invade
  2. Property interests of another
  3. By use of reasonable force to avert
  4. A reasonably apparent threat
  5. To the entire (or substantial part) of the community
26
Q

Private Necessity (5)

A
  1. Limited privilege to intentionally invade
  2. Property interests of another
  3. By use of reasonable force to avert
  4. A reasonably apparent threat
  5. To one’s own person or property
27
Q

Exception to informed consent (1)

A

Risks that ought to be known by everyone or are already known

28
Q

Burden of Proof for CIF

A

More likely than not

29
Q

Common carriers and inn keepers

A

liable for slight negligence

30
Q

Duty of care of property owner to invitee (3)

A

1) inspect property,
2) discover danger
3) protect invitee

31
Q

Evidence for Res Ipsa Loquitor

A

Circumstantial

32
Q

Concurrent tortfeasors contributing to an individual injury

A

When the tortious acts of two or more defendants are each a factual cause of an indivisible injury to the plaintiff, the defendants are jointly and severally liable

33
Q

Contributory negligence is not a defense to

A

an intentional tort, gross negligence, or recklessness.

34
Q

In the vast majority of modified comparative-fault jurisdictions, if the plaintiff and the defendant are found to __________, then the _________

A
  1. be equally at fault

2. plaintiff recovers 50% of his total damage