Religious experience Flashcards

1
Q

richard swinburne on religious experience

A

helps prove the existence of god

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

richard swinburne

two types of religious experience

A

public
1) ordinary interpreted experiences such as the beauty of the sky
2) extraordinary experiences such as jesus walking on water
private
1) experiences describable in normal language
2) experiences that are ineffable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

richard swinburne

the principle of testimony

A

makes sense to believe what people tell you since most tell the truth
we ought to believe that things are as they seem to be, until we have evidence that we are mistaken
shouldn’t doubt other people
- too optimistic and idealistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

richard swinburne

the principle of credulity

A

(in the absence of special considerations) the experiences of others are (probably) as they report them
trust intuition, shouldn’t doubt yourself
- some argue religion itself is a special consideration and that you are more likely to see things that arent there if you belong to a religious group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

richard swinburne

priory probability argument

A

the probability of the existence of a cosmological god is higher than that of aliens so the likelihood should be taken seriously
- antony flew 10 leaky buckets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

william james on religious experience

A

something is real if it has real effects
we cant deny the effect of religious experiences on people so william james uses these as evidence for the existence of god

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

william james

defining religious experience

A

passivity (not in control)
ineffable (cant be described in human language)
noetic (leads to greater understanding)
transient (experience is temporary)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

criticisms of william james

A

nicholas lash: experiences are about experiencing god through pattern setters
peter vardy: ‘anti realist’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

william alston

A

experiences are non sensory, god is spiritual and cannot effect people physically
- spiritual can still have physical effects eg ghosts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

kant

A

we cannot use our senses to experience god since he is in the noumenal world whereas we are stuck in the phenomenal world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

sigmund freud on religious experience

A

argument from psychology
religious experience is wish fulfilment
religion is a universal obsessional neurosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

sigmund freud

primal horde theory

A

1) every society consists of a primal horde who gather round a dominant male
2) male inevitably killed out of jealousy
3) guilt passes down through history into peoples unconscious minds
4) males focus guilt on totem animal
5) pray to totem and sacrifice animals
6) god is ultimate totem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

sigmund freud

comparison between religion and oedipus complex

A

god acts as a replacement father figure and people turn to religion out of fear of death (displacement?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

sigmund freud

criticisms

A

michael palmer: how does the oedipus complex apply to religious experience when people believe in multiple gods
paul vitz: using freuds logic argues that atheists are simply rejecting their father figure by not believing in god
anne marie rizzuto: not removed the illusion with religion but replaced religion with an illusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

antony flew
vicious circle argument
(opposition to religious experience)

A

x leads to y, which in itself enforces x
a religious belief enforces a religious belief and vice versa
- doesnt account for people converting to a religion without having a religious experience
- people of one religion having religious experiences relating to a different religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

david hume

conflicting claims argument

A

two opposing religious experiences cancel each other out and discredits them ‘a triumph for the sceptic’

  • two conflicting religious experiences still leaves the possibility of one being correct
  • j smart: all experiences come from the same god but are merely interpreted differently
17
Q

karl marx

the sociological argument

A

religion is a way to oppress and alienate lower classes

1) flower covered chains (oppresses but seems to comfort)
2) religion is a false sun (appears to give us clarity but does not)
3) religion is the opium of the people
4) religion is the sigh of the oppressed
- was proposed in a time where many religions were corrupt which arguably does not apply to modern world religion

18
Q

corporate experiences definition

A

experiences that happen in public places to several people, e.g. toronto blessing 1994

19
Q

corporate experiences

strengths

A

1) numerically valid

2) shows shared feelings and responses which is more valid than individual experiences

20
Q

corporate experiences

weaknesses

A

1) why would god show himself by making people laugh hysterically and bark like dogs (toronto blessing)
2) hank hanegraff
such phenomena are the result of mass hypnosis
3) william sergeant
mass religious conversions are down to conditioning

21
Q

individual experiences definition

A

the feelings, acts and experiences of individual men

22
Q

individual experiences

strengths

A

1) can be authenticated personally
2) less likely to be conditioned
3) cant be put down to mass hypnosis

23
Q

individual experiences

weaknesses

A

1) cannot be physically seen as corporate religious experiences
2) often no witnesses
3) lack of empirical evidence

24
Q

glossolalia

speaking in tongues

A

well known form of religious experience whereby people slip into an indistinguishable language, adhering to the view that such experiences are ineffable and appear possessed by god’s grace

25
Q

glossolalia

emil kraepelin

A

people that speak in tongues are schizophrenic and are unhealthy
-john kildahl: speaking in tongues is good for stress relief

26
Q

glossolalia

goodman

A

when people speak in tongues they are simply in a trance

-samarin: goodman only looked at one group in his study

27
Q

glossolalia

newburg’s study 2006

A

the experience itself is real to the person but not necessarily real in itself

28
Q

numinous experience definition

A

an indescribable experience which evokes feelings of awe, worship and fascination.
a feeling of a presence greater than yourself.

29
Q

conversion experience defintion

A

an experiences that produces a radical change in someones belief system

30
Q

mystical experience definiton

A

experiences of god or the supernatural which go beyond every day sense experience

31
Q

schleirmacher on religious experience

A

tried to identify features that make it a religious experience and whether they can ever be seen as evidence
‘religious experience should be at the heart of the faith’
‘self authenticating’
experiences should have priority and statements of belief should be formulated to fit them, catholic tradition had the authenticity the wrong way round