Homicide Law and Defences Flashcards

1
Q

What is a “legal duty”?

A

The expression “legal duty” refers to those duties imposed by statute or common law including uncodified common law duties.

Examples include:-

  • Provide the necessaries and protect from injury
  • Protect from injury to your charges when parent or guardian.
  • Provide necessaries as an employer
  • Use reasonable knowledge and skills when performing dangerous acts such as surgary.
  • Avoid omissions that will endanger life
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 Circumstances where homicide becomes culpable.

A
  • By an unlawful act
  • By an omission without lawful excuse to perform or observe any legal duty
  • By both combined
  • By causing that person by threats or fear of violence, or by deception to do an act which causes his death
  • By wilfully frightenin a child under 16 or a sick person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

List the differences between 174 counselling or attempting to procure murder and 175 conspiracy to murder.

A

174

  • Murder is not comitted
  • Deals with Procuring or Counselling Murder

175

  • Applies when murder is comitted or not
  • Deals with conspiracy to murder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does S180 (2) state about suicide pacts?

A

Makes it an offence for 2 people to enter into a suicide pact where they are both responsible for the actions that caused one of their deaths and one of them survives. Liable to imprisonment to 5 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What subjective criteria are used to asses use of force in a plea of self defence?

A

The degree of force used

  • What are the circumstances that the defendant genuinely beleives exist
  • Do you accept that the defendant genuinely beleives those facts?
  • Is the force reasonable in the circumstances beleived to exist?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the procedure used when Alibi winesses are interviewed?

A
  • Advise defence counsel of the proposed interview and give them a reasonable oppurtunity to be present
  • If the defendant is not represented, endevour to ensure the witness is interviewed in the prescence of some independant person not being a member of Police.
  • Make a copy of the witnesses signed statement taen at any such interview available to defence counsel through the prosecutor. Any information that reflects on the credibility of the witness can be withheld.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If the defendant intends to call an expert witness during proceedings, the must disclose to the prosecutor the following….

A
  • Any breif of evidence to be given or any report provided by that witness, OR
  • If that breif or any such report is not available, a summary of the evidence to be given and the conclusions of any report provided
  • This information must be disclosed at least 10 working days before the fixed date of trial, or within any further time that the Court allows
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define ‘Killing of a child’ under Section 159

A

159 Killing of a Child

(1) A child becomes a human being within the meaning of this act when it has completely proceeded in a living state from its Mother, whether it has breathed or not, whether it has independant circulation or not and whether the naval string is severed or not.
(2) The killing of such a child is homicide if it dies of injuries received before, during or after childbirth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In common law, allegations of culpable homicide have been supported where the offender has caused death by particular circumstances. Name four of these.

A
  • Committing Arson
  • Conducting illegal abortion
  • Giving child an excessive amount of alcohol to drink
  • Supplying heroin to the deceased
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Give two examples of culpable homicide that has been caused by the victim’s actions, prompted by threats or fear of violence.

A
  • Jumps into a river to escape attack and drowns
  • Jumps or falls out of a window because they think they are going to be assaulted and dies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

To establish proof of death you must prove three key elements. What are they?

A
  • eath occurred
  • Deceased is identified as the person who has been killed
  • the killing is cupable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define Homicide as per S158

A

Homicide is the killing of a human being by another, directly or indirectly, by any means whatsoever.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define attempts S72(1)

A

Everyone who, having an intent to commit an offence, does or omits an act for the purpose of accompishing his object, is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence intended, whether in the circumstances it was possible to commit the offence or not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define culpable homicide S160(1) and (2)?

A

(1) Homicide may be either culpable or not culpable.
(2) Homicide is culpable when it consists in the killing of any person

  • By an unlawful act; or
  • by an omission without lawful excuse to perform or observe any legal duty;or
  • by both combined;
  • by cauing that person by threats or fear of violence or by deception to do an act that causes his death; or
  • By wilfully frightening a child under the age of 16 years or a sick person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does Adams on Criminal Law define Wilfully frightening?

A

“Intending to frighten, or at least be reckless as to this”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is a body required to prove the death of a person? Explain your answer with reference to case law R v Horry?

A

No a body is not required.

R V HORRY

“Death should be proved by such circumstance as render it morally certain and leave no ground for reasonable doubt - that the circumstancial evidence should be so cogent and compelling as to convince a jury that upon no rational hypothesis other than murder can the facts be accounted for”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What does R v HARNEY state about ‘recklessness.’

A

R v HARNEY

“[Recklessness involves] foresight of dangerous consequences that could well happen, together with an intention to continue the course of conduct regardless of the risk”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Explain voluntary manslaughter.

A

Mitigating circumstances, such as a suicide pact, reduce what would otherwise be murder to manslaughter, even though the defendant may have intended to kill or cause GBH.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Explain difference between voluntary and involuntary manslaughter.

A

Voluntary:-

Mitigating circumstances that reduce murder to manslaughter even though defendant may have intended to kill or cause GBH.

Involuntary:-

Covers killing caused by an unlawful act or gross negligence when there has been no intention to kill or cause GBH.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Complete the sentencing for the section of abandoning a child. Section 154

A

Everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who unlawfully abandons or exposes any child under the age of 6 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Outline the ingredients of section 152 - duty of parent or guardian to provide necessaries and protect from injury

A

(1) Every one who is a parent, or is a person in place of a parent, who has actual care or charge of a child under the age of 18 years is under a legal duty -
(a) To provide that child with necessaries; and
(b) to take reasonable steps to protect that child from injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Explain the defence for children under 10 and children 10 to 13?

A

A child under 10 years ha and absolute defence to any charge brought against them.

For children aged between 10 and 13 years it must be shown that the child knew their act was wrong or contrary to law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Section 23 - Insanity

A

Every one shall be presumed sane at the time of doing or omitting any act until the contrary is proved.

Insanity before or after the time when he did or omitted the act, and insane delusions, though only partial, may be evidence that the offender was, at the time when he did or omitted the act, in sucha condition of mind as to render him irresponsible for the act or omission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

State MCNAUGHTENS’s rules.

A

If a person is insane they were acting under such a defect of reason from a disease of the mind that they did not know:-

THe nature and quality of theri actions, or

that what they were doing was wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Define Automatism and Case law R v COTTLE

A

Automatism is a state of total bblackout and the person is not conscious of their actions or in control of them.

R V COTTLE

Doing something without knowledge of it and without memory afterwards of having done it - a temporary eclipse of consciousnedd that nethertheless leaves the person so affected able to exercise bodily movements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What case law deals with automatism brought about by voluntary intake of alcohol or drugs? What does it state?

A

R V LIPMAN

Where automatism is brought about by a voluntary intake of alcohol or drugs the Court may be reluctant to accept that the actions were involuntary or that the offender lacked intention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Explain what a ‘strict liability’ offence is and give an example.

A

A strict liability offence is an offence where no mens rea need be proved by the prosecution. An exmaple of this is driving with excess breath alcohol.

28
Q

What three points must be satisfied before a defence of compulsion can be used?

A
  • Beleif must be genuine
  • Presence
  • Immediacy
29
Q

Discuss the defence of entrampment.

A

Entrapment is not a defence per se preferring instead to rely on the discretion of the trial jusge to exclude evidence that would operate unfairly against the defendant.

Entrapment occurs when an agent of an enforcement body deliberately causes a person to committ an offence for prosecution.

30
Q

Explain the subjective criterea for the degree of force used in relation to self defence

A
  • What are the circumstances that the defendant genuinely believes exist?
  • Do you accept the the defendant genuinely beleives those facts?
  • Is the force used reasonable in the circumstances believed to exist?
31
Q

S168(1)(a) refers to GBH. What does this mean and give an example of such an injury

A

GBH means grevious bodily injury. To injure means to cause actual bodily harm. (R V DONOVAN) an example of this would be stab wound to abdoman.

32
Q

Simester and Brookbanks suggests the following questions should be asked in determining the point at which an act of mere preparation may become an attempt. What are those 2 questions?

A
  • Has the offender done anything more than getting himself into a position from which he could embark on an actual attempt? or
  • Has the offender actually commenced execution; that is to say, has he taken a step in the actual offence itself?
33
Q

What was held in R V MANE

A

R V MANE

For a person to be an accessory the offence must be complete at the time of the criminal involvement. One cannot be convicted of being an accessory after the fact of murder when the actus reus of the alleged criminal conduct was wholly completed before the offence of homicide was completed

34
Q

Define involuntary manslaughter

A

Covers the types of unlawful killing in which the death is caused by an unlawful act or gross negligence and there has been no intention to kill or cause GBH.

Manslaughter includes culpable homicide that:

Does not come within S167 or 168

Comes within s167 and s168 but reduced to manslaughter due to circumstances (suicide pact)

35
Q

State the ingedients of S178, infanticide.

A

(1) while the balance of her mind was disturbed by reason of
(2) her not having fully recovered from the effect of having given birth to a child (or) the effect of lactation (or) a disorder consequent upon childbirth (or) a disorder consequent upon lactation
(3) to such an extent that she should not be held fully responsible, caused the death of her child ( ), aged (specify age under 10), in a manner amounting to culpable homicide and thereby committed infanticide

36
Q

Outline S18(1)(a) &(b) - admissable hearsay

A

A hearsay statement is admissible in an proceeding if

  1. The circumstances relating to the statement provide reasonable assurance that the statement is reliable
  2. Either - the maker of the statement is unavailable as a witneess; or
  3. The judge considers that undue expense or delay would be caused if the maker if the statement were required to be a wtiness.
37
Q

Explain the meaning of ‘Justified’

A

In relation to any person, justified means that the person is not guilty of an offence and is not liable civilly

38
Q

What does R V CLANCY state?

A

The best evidence as to the date and place of a childs birth will normally be provided by a person attending at the birth or the childs mother…..,production of the birth certificate, if available, may have added to the evidence but was not essential.

39
Q

What does R V MYATT state about unlawful act in respect of S160(2)(a)?

A

[Before a breach of any Act, regulation or bylaw would be an unlawful act under s160 for the purposes of culpable homicide] it must be an act likely to do harm to the deceased or to some class of persons of whom he was one.

-Law requires that the act must be one that is likely to do harm or is inherently dangerous as well as being unlawful.

40
Q

List four ‘legal duties’ in respect of S160(2)

A
  • Provide the necessaries and protect from injury
  • Avoid omissions that will endanger life
  • Provide necessaries and protect from injury to your charges when you are a parent of guardian
  • Provide necessaries as an employer
41
Q

What does R v TOMARS state?

A

R v TOMARS formulates the issues of threats or fear of violence in the following way.

  1. Was the deceased threatened by, in fear of or deceived by the defendant?\
  2. If they were, did such threats, fear or deception cause the defendant to do the act that caused their death?
  3. Was the act a natural consequence of the actions of the defendant, in the sense that reasnoabke and responsible people in the defendants position at the time could reasonably have foreseen the consequences?
  4. Did these forseeable actions of the victim contribute in a [significant] way to his death?
42
Q

In geneal, no one is criminally responsible for the killing of another by any influence of the mind. What are the exceptions to this rule?

A
  1. Wilfully frightening a child under 16 or a sick perosn
43
Q

Some acts are justified, even when they result in death. What is meant by the term ‘Justified’? Provide two examples.

A
  • Homicide comitted in self defence
  • Homicide committed to prevent suicide or commission of an offence which would likely to cause immediate and serious injury to a person
44
Q

Why is attempted murder one of the most difficult offences in the crimes act to prove?

A

Must prove ‘intent’ to committ the offence. Offence cannot be an attempt where an offence is defined solely in terms of recklessness or negligence.

(R v MURPHY)

45
Q

What are the ingredients for s176 - Accessory after the fact to murder?

A

knowing any person to have been a party to the offence, receives, comforts, or assists that person or tampers with or actively suppresses any evidence against him or her, in order to enable him or her to escape after arrest or to avoid arrest or conviction

46
Q

How does s180(3) define the term ‘suicide pact’?

A

suicide pact means a common agreement between 2 or more persons having for its object the death of all of them, whether or not each is to take his or her own life; but nothing done by a person who enters into a suicide pact shall be treated as done by him or her in pursuance of the pact unless it is done while he or she has the settled intention of dying in pursuance of the pact.

47
Q

What conditions must be met before a statement from a dangerously ill person may be given in evidnece?

A
  • If they are dead at the time of the hearing
  • Reasonable assurance of statements reliablitly can be shown
48
Q

Discuss the case of R v FORREST & FORREST and what does case law state?

A

Two men charged with having sexual intercourse with a 14 year old girl.

At trial girl produced her birth certificate and gave evidence that she was ther person named on certificate.

Successfull appeal of convictions on the grounds the Crown had not adequately proved the girls age.

Court of appeal suggested an additional testmony for instance what day she celebrated her brothday, age she went to school etc

R v FORREST & FORREST

“The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of the victims age”

49
Q

Definition of insanity - S23(2)(a)&(b)

A

No person shall be convicted of an offence by reason of an act done or omitted by him when labouring under natural imbecility or disease of the mind to such an extent as to render him incapable -

Of understanding the nature and quality of the act or omission OR

Of knowing that the act or omission was morally wrong, having regard to the commonly accepted standards or right and wrong.

50
Q

Define Automatism

A

A state of total blackout, during which a person is not consciuos of their actions and not in control of them

51
Q

What are the differences between sane and insane automatism?

A

Sane automatism - The result of somnambulism (Sleepwalking), a blow to the head or the effects of drugs

Insane Automatism - The result of a mental disease

52
Q

Give 3 exapmles of how intoxication may be defence to the commission of an offence

A
  • Where the intoxication causes a disease of the mind so as to bring s23 (insanity) of the Crimes Act 1961 into effect
  • If intent is required as an essential element of the offence and the drunkenness is such that the defence can plead a lack of intent to commit the offence
  • Where the intoxication causes a state of automatism
53
Q

How does Chambers 20th Century dictionary define ‘Alibi’?

A

“An alibi is the plea in a criminal charge having been elsewhere at the material time: the fact of being elsewhere”

54
Q

What does R v BLAUE state and explain the case

A

R v BLAUE

“Those who use violence must take their victims as they find them”

In this case the defendant stabbed a jehovas witness who refused a blood transfusion on the grounds of her religious beleifs despite the fact it may have saved her life. The defendants appeal was dismissed with the judge ruling that the cause of the death was the stab wound.

55
Q
A
56
Q

Ingredients of section 48 (self defence)

A

Everyone is justified in using, in defence of their selves or another, such force as, in the circumstances as he believes them to be, reasonable to use.

57
Q

Provide 3 guidelines in respect of consent regarding assault

A

Everyone has a right to a surgical operation Everyone has a right to consent to the infliction of force not involving bodily harm No one has the right to consent to their death

58
Q

What is the definition of the period ‘a year and a day’ as outlined in section 162(2) of the crimes act 1961?

A

The period of a year and a day shall be reckoned inclusive of the day on which the last unlawful act contributing to the cause of death took place

59
Q

Section 168(1)(a) of ca1961 refers to gbi. What does this mean and give example of such injury.

A

means harm that is very serious such as injury to a vital organ

60
Q

R v lipman

A

Where automation is brought about by a voluntary intake of alcohol or drugs the court may be reluctant to accept the actions were involuntary or that the offender lacked intention

61
Q

Outline section 181 of the Crimes Act 1961 ( concealing a dead body of a child)

A

Everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years who disposes of the dead body of any child in any manner whith intent to conceal the fact of its birth wheter the child died before/during or after birth.

62
Q

A question of law relating to whether the condition is a diease of the mind is answered by…..

A

The udge

63
Q

What the accusedes state of mind was at the time of the offence is a question decided by….

A

The jury

64
Q

When a charge of infantcide is laid, who decides on the Mothers state of mind?

A

The jury

65
Q

Proximity is a question of law decided by whom?

A

The judge

66
Q

Define R V COX

A

Consent mst be full, free voluntary and infomred, freely and voluntary given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement

67
Q

Outline sectio 25 of Crimes Act 1961. (ignorance of the law)

A

Ignorance is not a defence nor an excuse for any offence committed