Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Evidence > Character Evidence > Flashcards

Character Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

PRIOR, SIMILAR OCCURRENCES

General rule

A

= must relate to time, event, or person in controversy to be admissible

If evidence concerns a time/event/person other than the one involved in the case at hand = inadmissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

PRIOR, SIMILAR OCCURRENCES

6 exceptions

A
  1. Plaintiff’s accident history
  2. Same event or condition
  3. Intent at issue
  4. Comparable sales
  5. Personal habit or industrial/business routine
  6. Industrial custom as SOC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

PRIOR, SIMILAR OCCURRENCES

Plaintiff’s accident history admissibility

A

Admissible

  1. ONLY IF the cause of the plaintiff’s injury is at issue
  2. BUT ONLY to show that they were the cause of the injury, not the accident that the plaintiff is suing over
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

PRIOR, SIMILAR OCCURRENCES
Similar accidents caused by the same event or condition
admissibility

A

Admissible to prove 3 propositions

  1. That a defect or dangerous condition existed
  2. That the defendant had knowledge of the defect or dangerous condition
  3. That the defect or dangerous condition was the cause of the present injury
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

PRIOR, SIMILAR OCCURRENCES

Intent is at issue admissibility

A

Previous similar acts admissible to prove

  • the party’s present motive or intent
  • when such elements are relevant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

PRIOR, SIMILAR OCCURRENCES

Comparable sales to prove value admissibility

A

The selling price of other property

  • Of similar type
  • In the same general location
  • And close in time to the period at issue

= can be admissible to prove property at issue to prove value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

PRIOR, SIMILAR OCCURRENCES

Habit admissibility

A

Admissible to prove that

  • on a particular occasion
  • the person acted in accordance with the habit

= Must be shown to be a regular response to a repeated specific situation

RULE 406

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Habit

DEFINITION

A

one’s regular response to a specific set of circumstances

RULE 406

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Habit

CHARACTERISTICS

A
  1. frequency
  2. particularity

RULE 406

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

PRIOR, SIMILAR OCCURRENCES

Routine admissibility

A
  • Same as evidence of personal habit relevant to show conduct

= Evidence that a business or firm had an established business routine is relevant as tending to show that a particular event occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Habit

COMPARATIVE DEFINITION + EXAMPLE

A

Habit = more specific and particularized than character

Example = she always take a staircase two steps at a time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Character

COMPARATIVE DEFINITION + EXAMPLE

A

Character = one’s disposition in respect to general traits

Example = she’s always in a hurry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Frequency

A

= repetitive response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Particularity

A

= specific circumstance in which it occurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

PRIOR, SIMILAR OCCURRENCES

Industrial custom as SOC

A

Evidence of general custom or usage

  • May be introduced by either party
  • To establish a standard by which reasonable/ordinary care may be judged WHEN
    a. General custom/usage is of the same kind of business
    b. Under the same circumstances AND
    c. One of the issues in dispute is negligence arising out of inadequate safety devices or precautions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is evidence of general custom as evidence of SOC treated?

A

ADMISSIBLE but not conclusive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Business routine

COMPARATIVE DEFINITION

A

= particular conduct and habit of a party offered to show that the party acted in same manner on the occasion in question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Custom of the industry

COMPARATIVE DEFINITION

A

= offered to prove the actions of other persons in the same industry in an attempt to show adherence to or deviance from an industry-wide standard of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

3 considerations in allowing

CHARACTER EVIDENCE

A
  1. Purpose for which evidence of character is offered
  2. The method to be used to prove character
  3. The kind of case = civil or criminal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

3 potential purposes of

CHARACTER EVIDENCE

A
  1. To prove character when character itself is ultimate issue in case
  2. To serve as circumstantial evidence of conduct on a particular occasion
  3. To impeach credibility with the witness’ poor character for truthfulness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

CHARACTER EVIDENCE

general rule

A
  • Evidence of a person’s character or character trait is - not admissible
  • to prove that
  • on a particular occasion
  • the person acted in accordance
  • with the character or trait

RULE 404

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

3 types of

CHARACTER EVIDENCE

A
  1. specific acts
  2. opinion
  3. reputation

RULE 405

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Specific Acts

DEFINITION

A

= evidence of specific acts as demonstrating character

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Specific Acts

KEY TAKEAWAYS

A
  • Permitted only in a few instances

- May be admissible if relevant for some other purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Specific Acts

EXAMPLE

A

where character is itself at issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Specific Acts

FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS

A
  1. Witness testifies that they are familiar with a pertinent specific act or instance of conduct committed by the person whose character is at issue
  2. Witness testifies as to the foundational factors that demonstrate personal knowledge of the act
  3. Witness testifies as to the act itself
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Opinion

DEFINITION

A

= witnesses who know the person testify regarding their opinions about the person’s character

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Opinion

FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS

A
  1. Witness testifies they have known the person whose
    character is at issue for a particular length of time
  2. Witness testifies that during that time, the witness has had an opportunity to form an opinion of the person as to a pertinent character trait
  3. Witness testifies as to their opinion, but without revealing specific incidents that helped reach the opinion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Reputation

DEFINITION

A

= testimony as to person’s general reputation in community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Reputation

KEY TAKEAWAY

A

Most common means of showing character

31
Q

Reputation

FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS

A
  1. The witness belongs to a certain community
    - Broadly defined
    - Includes towns, cities, workplaces, social organizations, military units etc.
  2. The person whose character is at issue also belongs to that community
  3. The witness testifies that the person has developed a reputation in the community for a “pertinent” character trait
  4. The witness testifies as to the reputation
32
Q

What is the general rule for using character evidence to impeach the witness’s poor character for truthfulness?

A

In civil or criminal case, that witness is subject to impeachment with evidence of poor character for truthfulness

33
Q

Truthfulness

A

= propensity to lie on the witness stand

34
Q

Methods of using character evidence to impeach the witness’s poor character for truthfulness

A
  1. Character witness could testify as to witness’s poor character for truthfulness
  2. Character witness could testify as to witness’s reputation in the community
  3. Evidence of certain kinds of prior bad acts
35
Q

Types of certain kinds of prior bad acts

METHOD OF IMPEACHMENT OF WITNESS’S POOR CHARACTER FOR TRUTHFULNESS

A
  1. Kinds of criminal convictions
    - Felonies
    - Misdemeanors and felonies that involve dishonesty or false statement
  2. Only admissible to impeach witness for character of truthfulness
    - Must still weigh against prejudicial nature in 403 balancing test
  3. Evidence of other bad acts involving deceit or lying
    - Can only be proven by asking the witness, not other documents or witnesses
    - Must accept her answer
36
Q

When can you use character evidence to serve as circumstantial evidence of conduct on a particular occasion IN CRIMINAL CASES?

A
  1. Character of defendant

2. Evidence of victim’s character

37
Q

Character of D in criminal case

CHARACTER EVIDENCE AS CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF CONDUCT ON PARTICULAR OCCASION

A
  • Prosecutor cannot offer evidence of D’s bad character to show that she acted in conformity with that character AS PART OF CASE IN CHIEF
  • D can choose to offer evidence of good character trait and that she acted in conformity with that trait on occasion in question
  • Prosecutor can offer evidence to REBUT if defendant chooses to present evidence of defendant’s own character
38
Q

What happens when criminal D chooses to offer evidence of character trait and that she acted in conformity with that trait on occasion in question?

A

Opens the the door to prosecution rebuttal

39
Q

2 permissible forms of prosecution rebuttal in criminal case

CHARACTER EVIDENCE AS CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF CONDUCT ON PARTICULAR OCCASION

A
  1. Can cross-examine D’s character witness

2. Can call its own character witness

40
Q

What is allowed when prosecution calls its own character witness to rebut criminal D’s evidence of character trait to prove acting in conformity with that trait on occasion in question?

A

Can give

  • Reputation AND/OR
  • Opinion testimony
  • About D’s relevant trait
41
Q

When D’s character witness gives reputation testimony, what questions must prosecution use to on cross to rebut in criminal case?
CHARACTER EVIDENCE AS CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF CONDUCT ON PARTICULAR OCCASION

A

When character witness gives reputation testimony = have you heard questions are used

RULE 405 = testing a witness’s testimony

42
Q

When D’s character witness gives opinion testimony, what questions must prosecution use to on cross to rebut in criminal case?
CHARACTER EVIDENCE AS CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF CONDUCT ON PARTICULAR OCCASION

A

When character witness gives opinion testimony = did you know Qs are used

RULE 405 = testing a witness’s testimony

43
Q

When must prosecution use “have you heard” Qs while cross-examining D’s character witness in criminal case?
CHARACTER EVIDENCE AS CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF CONDUCT ON PARTICULAR OCCASION

A

When character witness gives reputation testimony = have you heard questions are used

RULE 405 = testing a witness’s testimony

44
Q

When must prosecution use “did you know” Qs while cross-examining D’s character witness in criminal case?
CHARACTER EVIDENCE AS CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF CONDUCT ON PARTICULAR OCCASION

A

When character witness gives opinion testimony = did you know Qs are used

RULE 405 = testing a witness’s testimony

45
Q

KEY TAKEAWAYS
Cross-examining criminal D’s character witness to rebut
CHARACTER EVIDENCE AS CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF CONDUCT ON PARTICULAR OCCASION

A

Using have you hear or did you know questions to ask about specific acts that run counter to reputation or opinion testimony

  1. Must have a good faith basis to believe that the specific acts are true
  2. Must be prepared to make an offer of proof to the judge and opposing counsel
  3. Must be relevant to trait relevant to alleged crime
  4. Must take witness’s answer (AKA cannot admit additional evidence to rebut answer)
46
Q

When is evidence of victim’s character permissible in criminal cases to serve as CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF CONDUCT ON PARTICULAR OCCASION?

A

Permissible only in self-defense cases

47
Q

How may criminal D introduce evidence of victim’s violent character?

A
  1. in a self-defense case
  2. to prove conduct in conformity with that violent character on the occasion in question (AKA that the victim was first aggressor)
  3. by calling character witness
  4. to give reputation and/or opinion testimony
  5. about that character trait
48
Q

How may prosecution introduce evidence of victim’s character in a criminal case?

A
  1. If D chooses to offer evidence of victim’s violent character
  2. prosecution may rebut with
  3. victim’s good character and/or D’s bad character
  4. by calling a character witness
  5. to give reputation and/or opinion testimony
  6. about that character trait
49
Q

When can character evidence be used to serve as circumstantial evidence of conduct on particular occasion in CIVIL CASES?

A

Rule = Character evidence to prove conduct in conformity is NOT PERMITTED

50
Q

Rape shield laws

A

policy-based protections for victims of sex crimes

51
Q

Victim

A

definition includes alleged victims

52
Q

RAPE SHIELD RULE

A

Prohibited uses of victim’s character in sexual misconduct cases in CIVIL OR CRIMINAL case involving alleged sexual misconduct

  1. Evidence offered to prove that a victim engaged in other sexual behavior or
  2. Evidence offered to prove a victim’s sexual predisposition

RULE 412

53
Q

Other sexual behavior

A

Includes

  1. Actual sexual activity
  2. Conduct that suggest or implies sexual activity and
  3. Evidence of sexual fantasies and activities of the mind
54
Q

Rape shield rule

EXCEPTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES

A

In criminal case, court may admit

  1. Evidence of specific instances of a victim’s sexual behavior, if offered to prove that someone other than the defendant was the source of semen, injury, or other physical evidence
  2. Evidence of specific instances of a victim’s sexual behavior with respect to the person accused of the sexual misconduct, if offered by the defendant to prove consent or if offered by the prosecutor and
  3. Evidence whose exclusion would violate the defendant’s constitutional rights

RULE 412

55
Q

Rape shield rule

EXCEPTIONS IN CIVIL CASES

A

In civil case, court may admit

  1. evidence offered to prove a victim’s sexual behavior or sexual predisposition if its probative value substantially outweighs the danger of harm to any victim and of unfair prejudice to any party
  2. evidence of a victim’s reputation only if the victim has placed it in controversy

RULE 412

56
Q

To offer evidence of victim’s past behavior, what must a party do?
RAPE SHIELD RULE PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS

A

To offer evidence of victim’s past behavior, party must

  1. File a motion 14 days before trial, Describing the evidence and its purpose
  2. And serve the motion on all parties
  3. And notify the victim

RULE 412

57
Q

Before admitting the evidence, what must the court do?

RAPE SHIELD RULE PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS

A

Before admitting the evidence, the court must

  1. conduct an in camera hearing
  2. And afford the victim and the parties a right to be heard

RULE 412

58
Q

When is character in issue?

A

character is “in issue” when the substantive law must give the party no choice but to prove character if the claim or defense is to be substantiated

59
Q

May character be an element in criminal and/or civil cases?

A
  1. Character is never an element in criminal case

2. Character can be element in civil case

60
Q

Types of cases courts have found character evidence to be an essential element

A

Courts have found character evidence essential in the following types of cases

  1. The character of the plaintiff in a libel or defamation case,
  2. Character of an employee in a negligent hiring case,
  3. Character of the entrustee in a negligent entrustment case, and
  4. Character of the parents in a child-custody case
61
Q

Rule in civil cases

CHARACTER EVIDENCE TO PROVE CHARACTER WHEN CHARACTER ITSELF IS ELEMENT

A

= when a person’s character or character trait is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense, the character or trait may also be proved by relevant specific instances of the person’s conduct

RULE 405

62
Q

Analysis for specific acts evidence in civil cases

CHARACTER EVIDENCE TO PROVE CHARACTER WHEN CHARACTER ITSELF IS ELEMENT

A
  1. Is character or a trait of character the basis for an inference to prove conforming conduct?
    • YES = general prohibitions of FRE 404(a) apply
    • NO = Q2
  2. Is character or a trait of character is an essential element of a party’s case?
    • YES = character is “in issue” and the general prohibitions of FRE 404(a)(1) do not apply
63
Q 
FRE 404(a)(1) - Prohibited Uses
CHARACTER EVIDENCE
A

Evidence of a person’s character or character trait is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character or trait

64
Q

SPECIFIC ACTS OF MISCONDUCT

general rule

A

when a person is charged with one crime, extrinsic evidence of her other crimes or misconduct is inadmissible if such evidence is offered solely to establish a criminal disposition

65
Q

SPECIFIC ACTS OF MISCONDUCT

exceptions

A
  1. Independent relevance

2. Prior acts of sexual assault or child molestation

66
Q

SPECIFIC ACTS OF MISCONDUCT

permissible non-character uses - general exception

A

admissible if independently relevant =

  • may be used to prove something more specific than just bad character
  • BUT D must be actually contesting what evidence is used for

RULE 404(b)

67
Q

SPECIFIC ACTS OF MISCONDUCT

permissible non-character uses - mneumonic

A

MIMIC

RULE 404(b)

68
Q

SPECIFIC ACTS OF MISCONDUCT

permissible non-character uses

A
  1. Motive
  2. Intent
  3. Mistake or accident, absence of
  4. Identity
  5. Common scheme or plan
    = MIMIC
    RULE 404(b)
69
Q

SPECIFIC ACTS OF MISCONDUCT

permissible non-character uses - huddleston rule

A

= Huddleston Rule

  • Independently relevant uncharged misconduct by the D will be admissible
  • Without a preliminary ruling
  • As long as
    1. There is sufficient evidence to support a jury finding that the D committed the prior act AND = RULE 401 STANDARD
    2. Its probative value on the issue of motive, intent, identity, or other independently relevant proposition is not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice = RULE 403 TEST

RULE 401 STANDARD + RULE 403 TEST

70
Q

SPECIFIC ACTS OF MISCONDUCT

permissible non-character uses - special RULE 404(b) balancing analysis

A
  1. Is there a risk the evidence leads to an inference that the person had a propensity to behave in a certain way as a result of his or her character?
  2. Is there another purpose for which the evidence could be offered, other than the propensity inference?
  3. How effective will a limiting instruction be in containing the risk of unfair prejudice?
  4. Will the risk of unfair prejudice substantially outweigh the probative value of the evidence?
    (Some courts reverse the traditional 403 analysis here, requiring the acts evidence must be more probative than prejudicial to be admitted)
71
Q

When has the Court previously found a D presumed to be protected against undue prejudice?

SPECIFIC ACTS OF MISCONDUCT
permissible non-character uses

A

The Court has previously found that D is presumed to be protected against undue prejudice if:

  1. The evidence is offered for a proper purpose,
  2. The evidence is relevant,
  3. .The trial court made a FRE 403 determination, AND
  4. The trial court, upon request, instructed the jury that the evidence was to be considered only for the proper purpose for which it was admitted
72
Q

RULE 404(b) KEY TAKEAWAYS

A
  1. Although often used to admit criminal acts, the rule is NOT limited to crimes (includes wrongs and acts, applies to both criminal and civil cases)
  2. The other act need not be “similar” to the current criminal offense or civil claim
  3. The other act need not have occurred prior to the charged offense
  4. The accused may offer evidence under FRE 404(b) to show that another person committed the charged crime
73
Q

SPECIFIC ACTS OF MISCONDUCT

prior acts of sexual assault or child molestation - general exception

A

Rule =

  • Evidence of a defendant’s prior acts of sexual assault or child molestation is admissible
  • in a civil or criminal case
  • where the defendant is accused of committing an act of sexual assault or child molestation

RULES 413-415

74
Q

SPECIFIC ACTS OF MISCONDUCT

prior acts of sexual assault or child molestation - procedural requirement

A

The party who intends to offer this evidence must

  • disclose the evidence to D
  • 15 days before trial
  • or later with good cause

RULES 413-415

Evidence (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions