Chapter 7 Flashcards

Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic

1
Q

Q: What is Categorical logic?

A

A: A branch of formal logic in which the basic logical terms are all, some, no, are, and not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Q: What is a Square of opposition?

A

A: An arrangement of the four categorical forms. The opposition is apparent from the diagonals on the square.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Q: What are sub contrary statements?

A

A: An I statement and an O statement with the same subject and predicate. Sub-contraries can both be true, but they cannot both be false. Example: Some flowers are blue; some flowers are not blue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Q: What is distribution?

A

A: A term is distributed when the categorical statement in which it appears is about all things within the category designated by the term. The subject (S) term is distributed in A and E statements. The predicate (P) term is distributed in E and O statements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Q: What is universal affirmative?

A

A: (A) statement of the form “No S are P.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Q: What is stereotyping?

A

A: Thinking, in an unduly simplistic way, of all members of a class or group as being the same, on the grounds that some are. In other words, from the truth of an I statement assuming that an A statement is true. Examples: All Americans resist learning foreign languages; All Canadians love to ski; All Italians eat garlic; All Germans are well-organized. Such errors or stereotyping trade on a failure to carefully distinguish between SOME and ALL.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Q: What is a universal negative?

A

A: (E) statement of the form “No S are P.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Q: What is Particular affirmation (I)?

A

A: Statement of the form “Some S are P.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Q: What is Particular negative (O)?

A

A: Statement of the form “Some S are not P.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Q: Venn diagram

A

A: Diagram in which overlapping circles are used to represent categorical relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Q: What is immediate inference?

A

A: Inference of one statement directly from another, with no intermediate logical steps.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Q: What is conversion?

A

A: A logical operation on a statement in categorical form, in which the order of the terms is reversed. For example, the converse of “All S are P” is “All P are S.” For E and I statements, conversion produces logically equivalent statements. For A and O statements, it does not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Q: What is logical equivalence?

A

A: Logical relation between two statements that must necessarily have the same truth value. For instance, “Not all S are I” and “Some S are not I” are logically equivalent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Q: What is Contraposition?

A

A: A logical operation on a statement in categorical form, in which the statement is converted, and then non is attached to each category. For example, the contrapositive of “No S are P” is “No non-P are non-S.” For A and O statements, contraposition produces a logically equivalent statement. For E and I statements, it does not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Q: What is an obversion?

A

A: A logical operation on a statement in categorical form, in which the prefix non is added to the predicate. Then, if the original statement was affirmative, it was made negative. If the original statement was negative, it is made affirmative. Obversion always produces a statement that is logically equivalent to the original one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Q: What is contradictory (of a given statement)?

A

A: That statement must always be opposite to the original statement in truth value. If the statement is X, its contradictory statement in not-X. When X is true, not-X is false, and vice versa. For example, the contradictory statement of “All S are P” is “Some S are not P.”

17
Q

Q: what are the rules of immediate inference?

A

A: 1) Conversion

2) Contraposition
3) Obversion
4) Contradiction
18
Q

Q: What is Complementary predicate?

A

A: Predicate formed by placing non in front of an existing predicate. Example: the complementary predicate of musicians is nonmusician. Complementary predicates may also be referred to as contradictory predicates.

19
Q

Q: What are contrary predicates?

A

A: Predicates logically related so that nothing can possess both a predicate and it contrary, though things may possess neither. For example, happy and unhappy are contrary predicates. It is not possible for a thing to be both happy and unhappy, but it is possible for it to be neither happy or unhappy.

20
Q

Q: What is contrary (of a given statement)?

A

A: A logically related statement that can never be true when the given statement is true, although it can be false when the statement is false. For example, “All S are P” and “No S are P” are contraries. They cannot both be true, but they can both be false.

21
Q

Q: What is the false dichotomy?

A

A: An either/ or split that is faulty because it omits alternatives. (For example, to think that everything is either black or white would be to believe in a false dichotomy.) False dichotomies often seem plausible because contrary predicates are mistaken for complementary (contradictory) ones.

22
Q

Q: What is binary thinking?

A

A: Thinking in either/ or terms; assuming that the things one is thinking about must fall into one of only two classifications. See false dichotomy.

23
Q

Q: What is an existential interpretation?

A

A: Understanding of A and E statements as presupposing the existence of items in the subject category. This interpretation was standard in ancient times.

24
Q

Q: What is hypothetical interpretation?

A

A: Understanding of A and E statements as not presupposing the existence of items in the subject category. This interpretation is standard in modern times.

25
Q

Q: What is Categorical syllogism?

A

A: Argument with two premises and a conclusion, in which the premises and the conclusion are statements in categorical form and there are three different categories of things involved in the argument.

26
Q

Q: What is Syllogism?

A

A: See categorical syllogism

27
Q

Q: What is a major term?

A

A: Term that appears in the predicate position in the conclusion of a syllogism.

28
Q

Q: What is a middle term?

A

A: Term that occurs in both premises of a syllogism but not in the conclusion.

29
Q

Q: What is a minor term?

A

A: Term that appears in the subject position in the conclusion of a syllogism.

30
Q

Q: What is the fallacy of the undistributed middle?

A

A: Understanding of A and E statements as presupposing the existence of items in the subject category. This interpretation was standard in ancient times.

31
Q

Q: what are sorites?

A

A: A series of categorical propositions that are enthymemes. When unstated conclusions are supplied, it can be seen that the first valid syllogism generates a premise for the next, and so on. Example: All A are B; all B are C; all C are D; all D are E; therefore, all A are E.