Cognative - Grant / Simon and Chabris Flashcards

1
Q

What was the background for Grant?

A

To test context dependant memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is context dependent memory (grant) ?

A

Remembering in the same context as your first encounter with what your remembering.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the aim of Grants study?

A

To investigate context dependant memory and the specific contexts eg silence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the sample in grants study ?

A

39/40 participants (one left)
17 F / 23 M
age - 17 - 56

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the method of grant’s study ?

A

Comprehension test, article read in one condition and questions answered in the next.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What where the conditions (grant) ?

A

.silent silent
.silent noise
.noist silent
.noisy noisy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the results of the grant study?

A

studying in the same environment leads to better results, however studying in silence is better then with noise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the background/aim of Simon and Chabris?

A

To test intentional blindness, where the attention is diverted causing someone not to see something else.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the sample for Simon and Chabris ?

A

228 volunteers / 36 remover
16 groups of 12 individuals
students male and female

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the method of Simon and Chabris?

A

Each group watched a certain condition with a different task watching basketball players asked to count number of passes (hard/easy), then asked if they noticed anything unusual (gorilla or umbrella )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the results of Simon and chabris?

A

.54% noticed unexpected even
.67% of participants noticed the unexpected event in the opaque condition, compared to only 42% in the transparent condition.
.64% vs 45% easy vs hard conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly