ANTH BLOCK 2 Flashcards
What is Social Anthropology?
What is Social Anthropology?
- The study of Human Diversity
Origins of Social Anthropology
Origins in European history:
Origins of Social Anthropology
Origins in European history:
- Renaissance/Enlightenment: ‘Man,’ humanity, is the measure of all ‘things’ … same ‘underrneath’
Enlightenment Definitions:
Enlightenment Definitions:
- “ A late eighteenth-century international movement in thought, with important social & political ramifications. The Enlightenment is at once a style, an attitude, a temper critical, secular, sceptical, empirical, and practical. It is also characterized by core beliefs in human rationality, in what it took to be ‘nature’ and in all ‘natural feelings’ of [sic] mankind. Four of its most prominent exemplars are Hume, Thomas Jefferson, Kant & Voltair
Enlightenment definitions cont…
Enlightenment definitions cont…
- The Enlightenment represented itself as a return to the classical ideas of the Greeks & (more especially) the Romans. But in fact it provided one source of the revolutions that shook Europe & America at the end of the eighteenth century, and it laid the foundations for both the generally scientific worldview & the liberal democratic society, which, despite the many attacks made on them, continue to function as cultural ideas
Characteristics of Enlightenment:
TTHE
Characteristics of Enlightenment
TTHE:
- The truth was there to be ‘discovered’ by observation & scientific methods
- The enlightenment had practical results & is evident in the French Revolution, Captain Cooks journals, the US Constitution, Haitian independence & the legal-constitutional mechanisms
- Human beings are born free
- Emphasis on rationality
Founders of the ‘modern world’
Who?
The emphasised?
The physical & human world could be rendered knowable through
- (1596-1650)
Founders of the ‘modern world’
Who:
- Many philosophers, scientists, mathematicians & playwrights are described as “founders of the modern world”
The emphasised:
- The visual
The physical & human world could be rendered knowable through:
- Observation & tested through scientific methods
(1596-1650)
- Rene Descartes
Cartesian World Views
- “The ‘Cartesisian’ division (of the world) allowed:
Cartesian World Views
“The ‘Cartesisian’ division (of the world) allowed:
- Scientist to treat matter as dead and completely separate from themselves, and to see the material world as multitude of different objects assembles into a huge machine
Holism
When-ever:
Where-ever:
Multiple perspectives (sub-fields) with the aim of?
Holism
When-ever:
- From the beginning of human history until now
Where-ever:
- all varieties of people everywhere
Multiple perspectives (sub-fields) with the aim of? - Integrating them
Sub-fields of Anthropology?
LABS
Sub-fields of Anthropology?
LABS
1) Linguistic Anthropology (Linguistics)
2) Archaeology
3) Biological/Physical Anthropology
4) Socio-Cultral Anthropology
Biological/Physical Anthropology:
Biological/Physical Anthropology:
- Human & species development
- Nonhuman species (primatology)
- Human & non-human genetics
Is Biology Destiny? ‘Bio-Culture’
Is Biology Destiny? ‘Bio-Culture’:
- Culture is a key force in how humanbodies - individually & collectively - grow & develop
Sub Field Linguistic Anthropology Humans as the ‘talking animal’
- Study of?
Historical linguists:
Socio-linguistics:
Sub Field Linguistic Anthropology Humans as the ‘talking animal’
Study of:
- Language in its socio-cultral context
Historical linguists:
- Reconstruct ‘extinct’ languages
Socio-linguistics:
- Investigates relationships between language, culture & social relations
- Socio-culture variation & linguistic variation
Sub-field Social Anthropology
Also called?
Emphasis on:
Sub-field Social Anthropology
Also called?
- ‘cultural anthropology’ or ‘socio-cultural anthropology’
Emphasis on:
- recent or ‘living’ cultures, rather than past ones, as archaeology
Social/Cultural Anthropologist
Focus on:
Social/Cultural Anthropologist
Focus on:
- Why humans behave the ways they do
- Why some groups behave differently from other groups
Anthropology & Sociology
Anthropologist usually work with:
Usually:
Interaction:
More:
Anthropology & Sociology
Anthropologist usually work with:
- Smaller groups
Usually:
- Spend longer time on research (1-2 years)
Interaction:
- Face-to-face
More:
- More qualitative than quantitative
- Collect ‘stories’ rather than compile ‘statistics’
- Readers vs Counters
Anthropology & Psychology
Social anthropology: greater focus on the whole:
Increasing overlap b/w anthropology & psychology:
Anthropology & Psychology
Social anthropology:greater focus on the whole:
- The whole is greater than the sum parts of it (individuals)
Increasing overlap b/w anthropology & psychology:
- Anthropological studies in cross-cultural variation in psychology
- Child rearing
- Personhood & identity
Pets vs Prey (hunting vs pet keeping, Fukuda 1997
Key themes:
Pets vs Prey (hunting vs pet keeping, Fukuda 1997
Key themes:
- Interaction
- Cruelty/suffering/distress
- Vermin/game/wild vs tame/companion/pets
Competition or Companionship
Competition:
Companionship:
Competition or Companionship
Competition:
- Humans and animals
- Animals and humans. For example, a fox outwitting the hounds.
- Hunters ‘know’ animals in a way that those who do not hunt
Companionship:
- Therapeutic: ‘Thera-pet’
- Affectionate/loyal
- Not competitors, not ‘wild’
- Pet-keeping as cruel?
Ethnography:
Ethnography:
- The distinctive marker of what a social anthropologist is
- Participant observation is a key ethnographic research method
- Knowledge of local language/s is important
Precedents for Anthropological thought
- There is no
- Evolution:
- Functionalism and ‘meaning’ react against:
Precedents for Anthropological thought
There is no: ex nihilo creation
- Evolution did not not emerge in a vacuum
Evolutionism:
- Biblical story of fall from grace/out of Eden (decline)
Functionalism and ‘meaning’ react against:
- Evolutionist explanations
- Also react against each other
Evolutionism
19th century:
Key figures:
Cultural diversity because:
Evolutionism
19th century:
- ‘Western’ thought
Key figures:
- Lewis H Morgan (1818-1881) (US)
- Edward B Taylor (1832-1917) (UK)
Cultural diversity because:
- all pass through a series of evolutionary stages
Morgan & Tylor
All cultures:
Evolution:
Morgan & Tylor
All cultures:
- pass through the same development stages in the same order
Evolution:
- is unidirectional and moves from low/simple to high/complex
Morgans Evolutionary Stages
SBC
Morgans Evolutionary Stages
SBC
1) Savagery: Subsisting on gathering (fruits & nuts) & hunting
2) Barbarism: Pottery, Agriculture
3) Civilization: Literacy
Tylors Evolutionary Stages
MAP
Tylors Evolutionary Stages
MAP
Monotheism:
- one singular God/deity
Animism:
- Non- human entities (animals, plants & inanimate objects such as rocks) possess a spiritual essence
- Is the soul uniquely human?
Polytheism:
- Multiple deities (Gods)
Key Terms
Evolutionism
Singular:
Evolutionists put themselves:
Secular:
Secular humanity, contra polygenesis:
Key Terms
Evolutionism
Singular:
- not ‘really’ diverse: all societies could be ranked
Evolutionists put themselves:
- at the top, at the end of end of history
Secular:
- Promoting a ‘science’ of humanity
Secular humanity, contra polygenesis:
- Humans are equal & inventive
- Everyone will figure out their own paths on their own
Functionalism Bronislaw Malinowski
Bronislaw Malinowski
Set the standard for?
Conducted?
What type of work?
Functionalism Bronislaw Malinowski
Bronislaw Malinowski
Set the standard for?
- Conducting anthropological fieldwork
Conducted?
- Fieldwork in the Trobriand Islands, Papua New Guinea, 1915-1916 & 1917-1918
What type of work?
- ‘Objective’ and detailed ethnographic work, but there were his private diaries where he revealed a controversial side of his fieldwork
Functionalism vs Evolutionism
Society is like a?
- For example?
Where society, or its ‘parts’ comes from, is:
Functionalism vs Evolutionism
Society is like a:
- biological organism with many interconnected, co-dependent parts
- For example? the human body
Where society, or its ‘parts’ comes from, is:
- Not important
Functionalism as Method
Functionalism:
For example:
Important:
Functionalism as Method
Functionalism:
- how ‘A’ is related to ‘B’?
For example:
- Where ‘A; = how people produce food and ‘B’ = how people worship
- How does the A-B relation fit within a broader system that fulfils basic needs?
Important: society is about relations in the present
- Cannot change one part w/out changing the others
Functionalist Critique of Evolutionism
Functionalism rejects:
- Give example
Examine:
Functionalism can be:
Functionalist Critique of Evolutionism
Functionalism rejects:
- Evolutionism’s emphasis on objects evidenced, for example, in linear museums displays
Examine:
- A whole society’s division of labour
Functionalism can be:
- ‘Unconscious’; separate from official stated purpose
Religion and Functionalism
A functionalist approach to the purpose of religious beliefs suggests:
Mean that anthropologists can ask:
Religion and Functionalism
A functionalist approach to the purpose of religious beliefs suggests:
- That they are a set of ideas which help people accommodate misfortunes & anxieties
Mean that anthropologists can ask:
- ‘What is sacred?’
- Trees? Cows? The Sun?
Functionalisms
Individual:
Society:
Functionalisms
Individual: Malinowski
- Society functions to fulfil individual needs
- Food, shelter & psycological support
- Religion is to ameliorate misfortune & anxiety
- Gmelch on ‘Baseball Magic”
Society: Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) and Alfred Radcliffe-Brown (1881-1955)
- Society functions to fulfil social needs
- Food, shelter & social solidarity
- Religion serves to bind people together in loyal communities
Functionalism
How(contemporary) cultures meet the needs of individuals and/or society:
Parts of a cultural system are interconnected:
Human diversity explained by:
Functionalism
How(contemporary) cultures meet the needs of individuals and/or society:
- Preserve/perptuate ‘individual’ or ‘society’
Parts of a cultural system are interconnected:
- Change in one part will bring about change in other parts of the system
Human diversity explained by:
- Differences (or changes) in function
Key Terms
Evolutionism:
Functionalism:
Key Terms
Evolutionism:
- Secular ‘Science of humanity
- Egalitarian
- All equally capable of evolution
- For example, from superstition to rationality
Functionalism:
- Looks at contemporary interrelations through detailed ethnography, vs ‘arm-chair’ speculation about ‘origins’
- Egalitarian not ‘superstition.’
- Humans are trying to fulfil individual & social ‘needs’ to ‘maintain systems’