8) Misc Flashcards

(47 cards)

1
Q

indictment: def

A

written accusation w charge against D, issued by Grand Jury after reviewing prosecution’s evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

GJ: rights of target

A

NO right to be present
NO right to atty
NO confrontation
NO miranda warnings

YES 5A PASI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

GJ: exculpatory evidence

A

prosecution has no obligation to inform GJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

bail hearing: rights

A

D is entitled to individualized hearing to determine if bail should be granted or denied

NO right to bail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

bail: amt

A

IF bail is appropriate, it may not be excessive (more than nec to secure presence at trial)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

plea bargaining / conviction (exception)

A

plea is enough evidence to convict, except Alford plea (then need more evidence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Alford plea: def

A

D pleads guilty w/o admitting guilt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

plea must be:

A

voluntary and intelligent
(not knowing)

inc waiver of rights (trial by jury, confrontation, compulsory process, self-incrime, presumption of innocence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

plea: “intelligent” def

A

accused must be informed of general nature of offense pleading guilty to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

right to speedy trial: const basis

A

6A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

right to speedy trial: remedy

A

for fed const violation: dismissal w prejudice

state may have statute w other rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

speedy trial: clock starts

A

when D is:

1) accused by formal charging instrument OR
2) arrested + held to answer for a crime

(very rare cases could be DP issue for pre-arrest delays)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

violation of speedy trial right: test

A

factors

1) length of delay
2) reason for delay
3) demand for speedy trial?
4) prejudice to D (most important–REQUIRED)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

speedy trial: length of delay: amt

A

more than 1 year –> triggers inquiry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

speedy trial: length of delay: exception

A

Defense requested delays (inc motions) are excluded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

speedy trial: reason for delay

A

“good” reason: prosecution had no control over

bad reason = prosecution could have avoided by due diligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

speedy trial: demand for speedy trial

A

not filing one tends to show that D did not consider delay prejudicial

but filing one is not required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

speedy trial: prejudice to D: types

A

1) anxiety
2) oppressive pre-trial incarceration
3) degradation of evidence compromising the accuracy of the trial

(weakest to strongest)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

discovery / DP

A

violates DP if prosecution does not disclose evidence to D that is BOTH favorable AND material

20
Q

discovery: favorable: trigger of disclosure

A

depends on if D made dy rq or not

21
Q

discovery: favorable: trigger of disclosure: D made dy rq

A

any evidence that would tend to help D = “favorable”

22
Q

discovery: favorable: trigger of disclosure: D DID NOT make dy rq

A

only evidence that is clearly exculpatory = “favorable”

23
Q

discovery/DP: result

A

if P fails to disclose favorable + material evidence, D is entitled to new trial (or sentencing–depends on where evidence was relevant)

24
Q

discovery/DP “material” def

A

evidence would have created a reasonable probability of a different outcome (ie reasonable doubt)

25
discovery/DP: when triggered
not by plea bargaining or agreement
26
discovery/DP: destruction of evidence
only violates DP if D can show bad faith. negligence/recklessness not sufficient
27
right to counsel: what cases
any case that results in confinement | actual result, not potential result
28
ineffective assistance of counsel: for new trial must prove
1) counsel was ineffective AND | 2) had she been effective, reasoanble probability that outcome woudl have been different
29
ineffective assistance of counsel: "ineffective" def
fell below minimum standard of L-conduct
30
jury trial: what kinds of cases?
any crim proceeding where D faces a potential sentence of LONGER THAN 6 mo (triggered by potential, not actual)
31
jury trial: potential sentence of 6 mo...
1) must be longer than (not same as) | 2) can't add up minor offenses to get to 6 mo
32
jury makeup: distinguish btwn
jury POOL vs | petit (actual trial) jury
33
jury POOL rights
D has right to jury pool that reflects fair cross-section of ethinc and gender demographic of community
34
jury POOL: result
if D can show that a group was "systematically excluded" from jury pool, gets new trial
35
petit jury: rights
no right to fair cross-section but, using peremptory challenges to exclude jurors based on race or gender violates EPC, must offer neutrla basis for the challenge or will be denied
36
confrontation: const basis
6Am
37
confrontation: def
D has right to confront witnesses and evidence against him
38
confrontation right triggered by
ONLY by testimonial evidence
39
testimonial: def
sts made in context where RP wit would expect st to be used in crim trial
40
testimonial: exs
YES: wit telling police/911 what HAS HAPPENED in past (investigation) NO: wit telling police/911 what is happening now (responding to ongoing emergency
41
confrontation: if testimonial
then must subject wit to "adversarial testing"
42
adversarial testing: def
testimony under oath, subject to cross-exam | actual cross-exam not required
43
doulbe jeopardy: const basis
5A "nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb" 14DPC -- applies to states
44
DJ: rule
(to dismiss charge based on violation of DJ, must prove): has been in jeopardy before --for same offense --by same sovereign
45
DJ: when attaches
non-jury trial: 1st wit sworn, court begins to hear evidence jury trial: jury is impaneled + sworn
46
same offense
--occured out of same transaciton UNLESS 1) each charge requires proof of a separate crim impulse (separate V in single transaction), or 2) each charge requires proof of a separate factual element
47
same sovereign req: result
can be tried consecutively by state and fed for same thing