Opinion Flashcards

1
Q

Court’s view on Opinion and case?

A

R v Runjanji &; Kotinnen.
The law jealously guards the role of the jury or the Court where it is the trier of facts.

To allow witnesses to give evidence of opinion has been seen by common law as usurping function of the jury or judge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Section 76 Evidence Act?

A

The opinion rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

76 (1)?

A

The starting point is that opinion for the purpose of what the opinon was expressed about is not admissible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

76 (2)?

A

opinion contained in a document or certificate made under regulations of another act, and has evidentiary value under that act, is admissible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

76 (2) examples?

A

Fass Certificate

257 Certificate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How to determine if its a fact or opinion? JDE

A
  1. The greater the measure of judgement required;
  2. The greater the doubt in coming to a particular conclusion of fact, and
  3. The greater the scope in error,

The more likely the tribunal of fact will conclude the evidence to be opinion.

(The more interpretation, the more likely it is an opinion).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

S 77?

A

Evidence relevant otherwise than as opinion evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain S 77?

A

Opinion rule does not apply to evidence of an opinion if it is used for a purpose other than proof of the existence of a fact the opinion was expressed about. (Like s60)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

S 78?

A

Exception rule for lay opinions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

78 (1)?

A

Opinion rule doesnt apply to evidence of an opinion expressed by a person if;

a) Opinion based on what person saw, heard or otherwise perceived about a matter or event AND
b) Evidence of opinion is necessary to obtain an adequate account or understanding of the persons perception of the matter or event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What must always apply for opinion evidence?

A

S 55, must be relevant. Must always be rational basis for the opinion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Case on rational basis for opinion?

A

R v Panetta.
Person giving opinion must be able to offer a valuable opinion, and be better equipped than a member of the jury to form the particular opinion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Recap on s 78?

A
  • Must be relevant - S55
  • Opinion must have rational basis.
  • Based on what person saw, heard, otherwise perceived (first hand)
  • Court cannot receive an adequate account of persons perception by merely giving the facts.
    (R v Panetta)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

S 79?

A

Exception: Opinions based on specialist knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is specialist knowledge based on?

A

Their training, study or experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Two tests for S 79 admissibility?

A
  1. Person possess specialised knowledged based on training or study or experience, AND;
  2. The opinion proffered is based wholly or substantially upon that knowledge, study or training. (can’t give opinion on other things not specialist in.)
17
Q

ALRC report on Sepcialised knowledge?

A

Phrase specialised knowledge in S79 intended to extend the common law and to emphasise experience CAN be a sounder basis for opinion than study,.

18
Q

What must be demonstrated when using experience as basis for opinion?

A

Experience must be clearly demonstrated where it is asserted as basis for expert knowledge.

19
Q

Case for experience as specialised knowledge?

A

Weal v Bottom

Witness had no formal qualification but possessed a wealth of experience and could give expert evidence.

20
Q

Definition of Ad Hoc expert? Cases?

A

Giving evidence “For the specific purpose, case, or situation at hand and not other.”
Regina v Leung and Wong - Interpreter Gave evidence of who’s voice was who’s based on the amount of hours the interpreter listened to the material.
Morgan v R
Nguyen v R

21
Q

s 177?

A

Certificates of expert evidence.

22
Q

177 (1)?`

A

Evidence of persons opinion may be adduced by tendering a certificate (expert cert) signed by person that;

a) States name and address, AND
b) States they have specialised knowledge based on training, study or experience as specified in certificate, AND
c) sets out opinon they hold based on their knowledge.

23
Q

What must be included in 177 certificate?

A

The assumed facts they relied on to make their certificate.

24
Q

Case for assumed facts to be included?

A

Regina v Brian John Welsh.
Evidence of history taken by doctor has always been admissible to establish the basis they framed their expert evidence on, but not to establish truth of what was said.

25
Q

S110?

A

Evidence about character of accused persons

26
Q

how does 110 work?

A

If evidence is admitted that the def is a good person or of good character, hearsay, opinion, tendency and credibility rule do not apply to any evidence that proves directly or indirectly or by implication that he is not of good character. i.e - We can use what we have such as crim his to disporve them.