8.1 - Insuring Agreements and Their Exclusions in the CGL Policy Flashcards
Describe the sections of the insuring agreements of the commercial general liability (CGL) policy and their exclusions (45 cards)
5 Sections of the CGL policy
- Coverages
- Who is Insured
- Limits of Insurance
- Conditions
- Definitions
Section I - Coverages
-There are 4 distinct insuring agreements under Section I - Coverages to handle typical liability exposures for businesses:
A. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability
B. Personal and Advertising Injury Liability
C. Medical Payments
D. Tenants Legal Liability
-insuring agreements explain what the policy intends to cover by defining the scope of coverage
-having the general terms of coverage described helps insureds determine whether a claim is covered
-each of the insuring agreements carries its respective exclusions
Definition - “compensatory damages”
A sum of money to which a plaintiff is entitled that makes amends for an actual loss sustained and nothing more
-compensatory damages are those that compensate the TP for the injury sustained
-the policy coverage does not extend to any penalty sum, the cost of complying with a mandatory injunction (a court order that the insured is to do something or stop doing something), or the cost to prevent future losses
-to consider whether compensatory damages are being sought, consider this question: ‘Are the costs related to making the TP financially whole with respect to the injury?’
-those sums that solely represent a means to punish the insured, such as punitive or exemplary damages, do not fall within the scope of coverage
Definition - “bodily injury”
A term used in auto and lability policies meaning physical injury, including sickness, disease, mental injury, shock or death
-the policy defines bodily injury as bodily injury, sickness, or disease sustained by a person, including death resulting from any of these at any time
Definition - “property damage”
Injury to real or personal property through another’s negligence, willful destructions, or by some acts of nature
-the policy defines property damage as physical injury to tangible property including all resulting loss of use of that property
-the loss of use of tangible property that is not physically injured is also covered
-claims for subsequent loss of use are deemed to have occurred at the time of the physical injury that caused it
Definition - “occurrence”
A happening or event. Liability policies are usually written on either an accident or occurrence basis. For coverage on an accident basis, the loss or damage must be due to accident, whereas on an occurrence basis, all that is required is the happening or the continual or repeated exposure to an unfavourable situation, neither intended nor expected to cause injury or damage. In reinsurance and insurance, it is also the grouping of related losses into a single loss situation
-coverage was broadened when the term ‘occurrence’ was introduced to the wording
-occurrence was defined as an accident including any continuous event or exposure to substantially the same general harmful conditions
-the term “accident” was restrictive because it implied that suddenness and definiteness were part of the criteria needed to establish coverage
Coverage A. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability
-under the bodily injury and property damage liability insuring agreement, the insurer agrees to pay those sums that the insured becomes legally obligated to pay as compensatory damages because of bodily injury or property damage to a TP
-the insurer has a duty to defend the insured only if a claim falls within the terms of coverage
-when the policy does not provide coverage for an occurrence, the insurer has no duty to defend
-the bodily injury or property damage must occur during the policy period, must be caused by an occurrence, and must take place in the coverage territory
Phrase “legally obligated to pay”
-signifies there must be a legal obligation for the insured to pay a claim before coverage is triggered
-coverage is primarily intended for tort liability, but coverage can extend to some contractual and statutory liability
-the policy defines the conditions under which contracts will be insured and only certain contract as insurable
-statutory liabilities are only considered if payment is for compensatory damages
-arbitration proceedings or alternative dispute resolution (ADR), if agreed to by the insurer, will also qualify for coverage
-just because an insured is sued does not mean that the CGL policy will be triggered
-all of the defining elements of the insuring agreement must be met
-a sympathetic insured seeking to make a gratuitous payment to a third party would not qualify for coverage
-a policy payment is made only when the insured has a legal obligation to do so (except under Coverage C. Medical Payments)
Definition - “occurrence policy”
A liability policy that responds to claims for losses that took place during the policy period, regardless of when claims are made. As a result, claims can be filed years after the time the policy was in effect
Definition - “claims-made policy”
Refers to an insurance policy that provides coverage when a claim is made against the policy, regardless of when the claim event took place. A claims-made policy is most likely to be purchased when there is a delay between when claims occur and when they are filed
Liability policy coverage triggers
-liability policy wordings are also differentiated with respect to when coverage is triggered
-the standard ‘occurrence policy’ wording now in effect triggers coverage when damage occurs during its policy term
-this differs from a ‘claims-made’ policy wording that triggers when the TP first makes a claim against the insured
-for a claims-made policy, the timing of the event that caused the damage does not wholly determine coverage
-furthermore, underwriters may have modified the policy wording
-regardless of whether a policy is labelled as an occurrence policy or claims-made policy, the policy wording must be reviewed to determine what triggers coverage
-when advising a client on the perils of switching between an occurrence policy and a claims-made policy, or allowing a policy to lapse, the client needs to understand that they might be left with a gap in coverage
Coverage Territory
-coverage territory includes Canada, the US and its territories or possessions, and international waters or airspace if the injury or damage occurs in the course of travel or transportation between these two countries
-it provides coverage anywhere in the world for the travelling salesperson who is away for a short time on business
-goods or products made or sold by the insured in Canada or in the US and its territories or possessions are also covered anywhere in the world
-insurers require that actions be brought or merited in North America because UWs are presumably more familiar with their own legal environment and feel more confident that they can reasonably predict the outcome of such cases
-although such settlements are likely to be higher than in most other areas of the world, it is presumed that the environment is relatively more stable than elsewhere
occurrence limits
-the standard CGL policy intends to limit coverage for an occurrence to one policy term
-it deems that the insured knows about an occurrence prior to the policy period for losses reported under the current term that are really continuations, changes, or resumptions of a previous loss
-this prevents one occurrence from being considered a claim under successive policies
-this limitation was necessary to curb the trend in court decisions to extend coverage for one occurrence to multiple policies and, therefore, multiple limits
-a ruling in the ON Court of Appeal in the case ‘Alie et al. v. Bertrand et al.’ established a trend to trigger coverage on successive policies even though the damages stemmed from one occurrence
-In this case, Bertrand & Frere Construction supplied concrete that ended up having latent defects, all home foundation would have to be replaced. Defect traced to fly ash, a component in the cement supplied by Lafarge, another defendant. Bertrand and Lafarge were found 20% and 80% liable. In its decision, the ON Court of Appeal divided the significant defence costs between the 7 policy periods, and then equally apportioned them between the primary and excess insurers during each period
Exclusions for Bodily Injury and Property Damage:
a.
-the ‘expected or intended injury’ exclusion prevents the insured from recovering for outcomes that are expected or intended from the standpoint of the insured.
-When willful or reckless actions on the part of the insured cause harm to another party, the actions will be deemed as intentional on the part of the insured
-the application of the exclusion can be seen in the following situation:
> a home builder does not like the trees on the neighbour’s property because they obstruct the lake views of the homes the builder wants to sell. The builder hires a contractor to remove the trees. Since this is an intentional action that causes damage to the property of others, there is no coverage under the CGL policy.
-the insured must only use reasonable force in such circumstances in order to qualify for coverage
-the application of this exception to the exclusion can best be seen by contrasting situations in which the insured uses or fails to use reasonable force - situations in which the insured is thus covered or not covered under the policy:
> The proprietor of a restaurant must remove a troublesome patron from the premises to protect other customers and property. The proprietor uses reasonable force to accomplish his goal. When the patron sues the proprietor, the CGL policy will respond
> a store employee is unhappy with a customer after he makes a complaint. The next time the employee sees the customer at the store, he intentionally punches the customer in the face. Since this is an intentional act the employee knows will cause harm to another, there is no coverage under the CGL policy
Exclusions for Bodily Injury and Property Damage:
b.
-contractual liability is excluded under the CGL except for compensatory damages arising from liability the insured would have had whether there was a contract or not, as well as for compensatory damages arising from liability in an “insured contract” (known as ‘incidental contracts’ in earlier CGL wordings) as described in the policy
-an insured can assume liability in a contract as long as it merely reflects how the law would treat the situation in the ordinary legal sense
Exclusions for Bodily Injury and Property Damage:
c.
-Obligations of the insured under workers’ compensation legislation, disability benefits, or unemployment or employment compensation laws or any similar laws are not covered
Exclusions for Bodily Injury and Property Damage:
d.
-Employers liability arising from bodily injury to an employee during the course of employment is not covered
-nor does the policy cover any obligation of the insured to share compensatory damages or repay someone else who must pay them because of such an injury
-This exclusion does not apply to liability assumed under an insured contract or to a claim brought by an employee who was denied coverage or benefits by a provincial or terr. workers’ compensation authority even though contributions to the plan were required
-this contingent employers liability coverage would be subject to all the other terms and conditions of the policy
-the employer would have to be found legally liable and the loss would have to qualify for coverage
Exclusions for Bodily Injury and Property Damage:
e.
-Aircraft and Watercraft are excluded whether they are owned, maintained, used, or entrusted to others
-the exclusion extends to any aircraft landing area and all incidental operations
-former CGL wordings covered maintenance for airports, runways, and hangars, but this is now excluded
-the exclusion also extends to any loading or unloading of such craft
-the following exceptions apply to the aircraft and watercraft exclusion:
> Watercraft on shore at premises the insured owns or rents
> Non-owned watercraft less than 8 meters long and not being used to carry people or property for a fee
> Contingent employers liability with respect to employees on whose behalf contributions are required to be made to a prov. or terr. workers’ compensation board but where the board denies coverage and does not pay benefits
Exclusions for Bodily Injury and Property Damage:
f.
-the ownership, maintenance, use, or entrustment of others of any automobile, and loading or unloading of any automobile owned or operated by or on behalf of the insured, is excluded
-garage operators may require alternate coverage for faulty repairs resulting in injury and damage
-any motorized snow vehicle, its trailers, any vehicle while being used in any speed or demolition contest, or in any stunt or in practice, and preparation for any such contest or activity are excluded
-negligent supervision, hiring, employment, training, or monitoring of others by that insured in regard to claims involving automobiles are excluded
-the following exceptions to the automobile exclusions apply:
> bodily injury to an employee on whose behalf contributions are required to be made by the insured under the provisions of any prov. or terr. workers’ compensation law
> bodily injury or property damage arising out of a defective condition in, or improper maintenance of, any automobile owned by the insured while leased to others for a period of 30 days or more provided the lessee is obligated under contract to insure it
> ownership, use, or operation of machinery, apparatus, or equipment mounted on or attached to any vehicle while at the site of the use or operation of such equipment, but this exception does not apply when such equipment is used for loading or unloading
»_space;examples:
»_space;an insured leases an auto to a lessee on a long-term basis and the contract between them obligated the lessee to insure the automobile. An automobile accident ensues as a result of the defective condition of the automobile. The CGL policy provides coverage for the insured under these circumstances
»_space;A cherry picker with a hydraulic elevator mounted on a flatbed is used to change roadside lamp standards. During the light-changing operation, a pedestrian is injured. Coverage under the CGL applies
Exclusions for Bodily Injury and Property Damage:
g.
-property that is owned, rented, or occupied by the insured, including any cost for repairs, replacement, enhancement, restoration, or maintenance, are not covered
-this excludes any expenses incurred by an insured to prevent or correct a dangerous condition caused by, for example, debris removal or pollution releases
-damage to property owned by the insured does not constitute a liability claim
-to determine whether the ‘damage to property exclusion’ (formerly known as the ‘care, custody, or control exclusion’) applies, the relationship of the property to the insured must be assessed. Such property is more appropriately covered under a first-party property policy
(2) Property damage to premises that are sold, given away, or abandoned by the insured is excluded
> formerly, the term ‘alienated premises’ was used to describe such property. Because such premises pose a potentially high liability exposure, the risk exposure remains with the insured.
-the exclusion does not apply to premises that were never occupied, rented, or held for rent and are the work of the insured. This exposure is a completed operations hazard
(3) Property that is loaned to the insured is excluded because it would more properly be covered by property insurance. For example, a backhoe loaned to a contractor should be insured under a contractor’s floater policy extended to cover property of others
(4) Personal property that is in the insured’s care, custody, or control is excluded. Such property can be covered under other types of policies. For example, a shoe repairer needs a bailee’s lability policy to cover customer’s shoes
(5) That particular part of any real property on which the insured or any contractor or subcontractor is working is excluded whether the insured or a contractor on the insured’s behalf is working on the property.
> under earlier CGL forms, this coverage was provided under the broad-form property damage endorsement. It applies, for example, when a roofing contractor is doing repairs to a building
> If the contractor accidentally spills hot tar on the building, the contractor’s insurer will pay the TP for the building damage less the value of any repairs to that part of the roof being worked on. Disputes about how coverage is to be applied have arisen over how to interpret the term “that particular part” in the policy wording.
(6) That particular part of any property that must be restored, repaired, or replaced because the insured’s work was incorrectly performed on it is excluded
Exclusions for Bodily Injury and Property Damage:
h.
-‘property damage to the insured’s product’ arising out of it or any part of it is excluded
-damage to the insured’s product is considered a business or trade risk and is not eligible for liability insurance
-eg. a chair is sold to a consumer that is defective. The business’s CGL policy covers the obligation to pay for the bodily injury, however, the CGL does not respond to the property damage to the chair
Exclusions for Bodily Injury and Property Damage:
i.
-‘property damage to the insured’s work’ included within the completed operations hazard is not covered
-guarantee coverage is used for this exposure
-this exclusion does not apply if the damaged work or the work out of which the damage arises was performed by the insured’s subcontractor
Exclusions for Bodily Injury and Property Damage:
j.
-also not covered is ‘property damage to impaired property or property that has not been physically injured, arising out of’
> a defect or deficiency in the product or work; or
> a delay or failure to perform a contract or agreement in accordance with its terms
-this exclusion does not apply to loss of use of other property arising out of sudden and accidental physical injury to the insured’s product or work after it has been put to its intended use
-eg. insured supplies a defective wheel to an auto manufacturer. The auto becomes “impaired” when the wheel is installed. Its replacement will return the auto to its desired condition. Physical injury to the auto resulting from the defective wheel has not occurred. LOU of the auto pending replacement of the wheel is not covered. The product fails to perform as promised and, in fact, was never capable of doing so
-eg. the insured sells a generator to a factory owner. The generator is warranted to perform at a rated kilowatt per hour but does not. Coverage does not apply to claims that arise from the lack of power
Exclusions for Bodily Injury and Property Damage:
k.
-‘product recall’ is the cost of recalling the insured’s product or work or any product or work of which the insured’s product or work forms a part, and it is not covered
-in practice, some insurers come to an agreement with the insured and may assist with the expense of recalling a product
-it may be in the best interest of the insurer to get a faulty product off the shelf or out of the hands of the consumer before is causes a loss
-take, for example, recalling a child’s car seat because the child can loosen the seat’s harness when in the car seat. This could lead to an increased injury to the child in the even of a collision
-product recall insurance is required to cover this exposure