Negligence - Breach of Duty - Violation of Private Standard or Common Custom and Compliance with Statute Flashcards

1
Q

Actor’s Own Standard

Wal-Mart Stores v. Wright

A

A private standard cannot substitute for the legal standard of ordinary care. Plaintiff sued for a slip and fall case and t rial court instructed the jury to use Walmart’s manual as the standard of care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actor’s Own Standard

Restatement (Third)

A

Private standards may be used to estimate foreseeability of risk, feasibility of precautions or the plaintiff’s reliance on a duty of care, but it does not set a higher level of care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Custom

Restatement (Third)

A

Departure from customary safety precautions is evidence of negligence but does not require a finding of negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Custom

Duncan v. Corbetta

A

Custom can be used to establish a standard of care. Defendant used a lower quality of wood than was customary used to build a staircase and plaintiff was injured when a step collapsed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Custom Changing Law

A

Judges don’t generally favor custom as evidence that a law should change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Manuals and Codes as Evidence

A

If private or governmental organizations have manuals or codes, many courts will allow it as evidence that the defendant fell below the reasonable standard of care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cities Adopting Private Safety Codes

A

Cities may adopt an organization’s safety code. If that happens, the code takes on the force of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The T.J. Hooper

Custom and Safety

A

Companies are negligent if they don’t use safety technology that is not customarily used yet. Two tugboats and their cargo got lost in a storm because they didn’t have radios.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Compliance with Statute

Miller v. Warren

A

Compliance with a statute doesn’t show absence of negligence. If defendants knew or show have known that higher care than required would prevent some risk, they should act on it. Plaintiff got burned while waiting for rescue because the hotel did not have smoke detectors in all the rooms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Compliance with Statute

​Restatement (Third)

A

Compliance with a statute or regulation is not a defense. It shows evidence of reasonable care, but is not conclusive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly