4 - Self & Others Flashcards

1
Q

What was William James’ multidimensional - ‘me’ & ‘I’ self?

A

‘I’ = subject, agent, knower. i.e.

‘Me’ = object of reflection, know.. sets of beliefs, evaluations, attitudes (social psych interest).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is self-concept?

A

Mental representation of all of a person’s knowledge about his/her attributes… beliefs, thoughts, values etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are self-aspects?

A

Summaries of beliefs about the self in specific domains;

  • personal aspects ~ what distinguishes you from others e.g. traits
  • social aspects ~ social identities, e.g. friends.
  • domains ~ work, home, friends (often overlap).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the big two dimensions of self-concept?

A

Communion - warmth, social identity.

Agency - competence, goal attainment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are schemas?

A

A knowledge structure that links, organises & ‘weights’ self-concept components.

  • provides summary of core important characteristics.
  • guides interpretations of environment & performance of behaviour.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the narrative self?

A

“The story of who I am”. Internalised, evolving story of the self that binds, organises and provides meaning to self components aspects across time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the aspects of future selves and their purposes? What is Self-Discrepancy Theory (Higgins, 1987)?

A

Ought self - who should I be? & Ideal self - who do I want to be? ~ Guides behaviour.

Self-Discrepancy Theory; perceived discrepancy b/w actual self & self guides (future selves)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did McGuire et al. (1978) found in examining gender identity in children’s self-concept?

A

When child was in gender minority, gender was greater part of child’s concept of self.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Fazio et al. (1981) find when priming trait introversion-extraversion in situations?

A

People who were primed by the topic on introversion - they pulled their chairs closer to the other in the interaction - acting more extraverted.

Situational cues can activate different aspects of self.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is social comparison theory?

A
  • self-knowledge comes from comparing one’s own traits, abilities etc to others (Festinger, 1954).
  • leads to assimilation or contrast.. sameness or distinction.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is social feedback?

A

The process by which we internalise the perceptions of how others see us…
Others act as mirrors.. our selves are shaped by how we think others see us.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Miller et al (1975) find about self being shaped by how we think people see us? (Tidy Children).

A

Attribution of ‘You are Tidy’ led children to act tidier in class. & this behaviour increased

  • social source: label “tidy” > behaviour “clean up” > enforces label & behaviour = feedback loop.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is introspection?

A
  • looking inward at the contents of consciousness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Self-perception theory (Bem, 1972)

A

Infer self-knowledge by observing own behaviours (introspection).
Often happens if knowledge is weak or ambiguous.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the over-justification effect and how did Lepper, Greene & Nisbett (1973) provide evidence for it?

A

Children’s drawing task with 3 conditions:

  • Expected reward: extrinsic motivation
  • Unexpected reward: intrinsic motivation
  • No award: intrinsic motivation

When researchers returned - pencils were handed out with no instruction, those who were intrinsically motivated were 2 x more likely to draw w/o reward.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What function, in relation to self and master, does self-verification serve?

A

Confirms what one believes about the self, which provides accuracy of self-knowledge, one of the two components of mastery.

  • ppl prefer r/ships which agree w/ self-image, even if it is negative. A
17
Q

What function does control serve & what did Blanton et al (1999) find about children’s social comparison

A

Control - ppl make upward social comparisons to motivate behaviour and seek rewards.
Study found children who use upward social comparisons do better in the studies overtime.

18
Q

What is the enhancement motive?

A

The desire to maximise the positivity of one’s self views.

Define our self concepts in ways that make us feel better about ourselves

19
Q

What is the difference b/w trait and state self-esteem.

A

Cross-situationally stable vs temporary and situation-specific.

20
Q

What is the ‘better than average’ Lake Wobegon effect?

A

Most ppl see themselves as above average

21
Q

What are some self-protective mechanisms?

A

Self-defensive attributions - neg behaviours attributed to situations, positive as arising from traits.
Self-defensive social comparisons - downward social comparison, “I’m not as bad as…”
Self-affirmation - when one part of self is under threat, ppl may affirm different aspects

22
Q

What is impression management?

A

Presenting self in a way that enables us to fit in.

23
Q

What are some strategies of self presentation? (Jones & Pittman, 1982)

A

Ingratiation, self-promotion, intimidation, exemplification, supplication.

24
Q

What characteristics comprise of our impressions?

A

Physical characteristics - ‘beautiful is good’.
Social categories - gender, nationality.
Content-environment - spaces we occupy (student)
Behaviours - verbal & non-verbal.

25
Q

How does accessibility, cue salience, and correspondent inferences influence our first impressions?

A

Accessibility - of knowledge structures from concurrent, frequent, and recent activation. e.g. Adventurous + reckless - mountain climber.

Cue Salience - ability of cue to attract attention, i.e. unpredictability, stand out from context; pram in boardroom.

Correspondent inferences - 1st impressions often grounded in dispositional explanations where behaviours reflect traits etc.

26
Q

What is the correspondence bias? (Fundamental Attribution Biases FAE). How did Jones & Harris show it?

A

Tendency to overestimate the importance of personal/dispositional factors relative to environmental influences.
Study - Pro/Anti Castro Essay Free-choice Paradigm - when ppl are told that pro-Castro writers had no choice, people still think their pro-Castro…

27
Q

How Gilbert et al (1988) show that depth of processing can overcome the FAE?

A

Study: Pts watched video of anxious woman with subtitles, condition 1: sensitive topic, condition 2: innocuous… 2 groups, one w/ extra task to overload cog capacity…

Takeaway: deeper processing group who ‘sensitive topic’ attributed anxiety to situation not person.

28
Q

What is covariation theory (Kelley, 1986)?

A

Looking at more complex info about situation…

Consensus - does everyone else perform same behaviour towards same stimulus.
Distinctiveness - does the person perform the same behaviour towards other stimuli.
Consistency - does person always perform this behaviour to this stimulus?

29
Q

How are Inter-trait relationships combined to form impressions? (Asch, 1946)

A

Trait meanings are dependent upon inter trait context (Asch, 1946);

  • Intelligent and cold: intelligent = sly
  • Intelligent and warm: intelligent = wise
30
Q

How is our perception of others goal-dependent?

A
  • Mastery; ppl seek accurate impression when they will be held accountable.
  • Ppl form pos biased impressions to make themselves feel good.
  • Ppl with affiliation goals are more likely to assume that others have positive traits.
31
Q

Chapter Question: How does superficial and systematic processing of impressions differ? Give an example for each.

A

Superficial processing - uses a single attribute, e.g. attractiveness. Is fast, automatic, & leads to assumptions about future behaviours or beliefs based on past judgements. i.e. Conservative position on issue A in past = predicted conservative position on issue B in future.

Systematic processing - integrating multiple factors - leads to causal reasoning, e.g. intelligent + cold = calculating.

32
Q

How does the primacy effect work in relation to the lasting effects of initial impressions? What is the perseverance bias?

A

The earlier information (primacy) has the greatest amount of information, leads to conservatism. Initial info shapes impression which is resistant to change, i.e. perseverance bias, even after it’s been discredited.

33
Q

What is the self-fulfilling prophecy?

A

Process by which one person’s expectations about another become reality by eliciting behaviours that confirm the expectations.

34
Q

When presented with inconsistent information about a person, what is someone likely to do? e.g. Dave is hostile. Dave is kind.

A

Integration & reconcile differences, i.e. Dave is kind to family, but hostile to strangers.