Phytoregulations Flashcards
Who regulates Phytochemicals in Canada? What is the name of the act?
- Regulated by Health Canada in the Food and Drug Act
- Evaluates and monitors safety and effectiveness of foods and drugs
What are the branch(es) under Health Canada that deals with the various foods?
Health Protection and Foods Branch
- Therapeutic Products Programme (TPP)
- Formly known as Drug Directorate
- Deals with drugs, medicinal devices, biological products - Food Directorate (FD)
- Regulates foods with the goal of improving health of Canadians through science-based policies - Natural and Non-Prescription Health Products Directorate (NNHPD)
- Newest branch
- In between foods and drugs
- Take into consideration existing FDA regulations, but make amendments where appropriate
- Also regulates clinical trials after NHPs!
What is the history of how NNHPD came to be?
- Due to increasing concern over unregulated NHPs in Canada, the Federal Government formed a Standing Committee to investigate the matter
- Report was published with 53 recommendations in a parliamentary report
- Government accepted all 53 recommendations and Office of Natural Health Products was created
- Later changed name: ONHP ⟶ Natural Health Product Directorate ⟶ Natural and Non-prescriptive Health Product Directorate (NNHPD)
- Broadened products to all self-care (cosmetics, NHPs, non-prescriptive drugs, disinfectant products)
- In the future, may regulate self-care products using risk-based regulation
- Health Canada may go from regulating all NHPs to only regulating those who make high risk claims
- May be unreasonable especially for products that rely on long history of use (eg. herbal remedies)
What were the key recommendations in the parliamentary report?
- Establishment of a new regulatory authority specifically for NHPs
- Have a third category to distinguish NHP from foods and drugs
- Rationale: NHPs share properties of both foods and drugs, yet are dissimilar to both
What are the NNHPD Regulatory Components?
- Licensing
- Product (to get NHP #)
- Site - Product labelling + packaging
- GMPs (Good Manufacturing Processes)
- Reporting on adverse events
What were the 8 common concerns from the public about NNHPD?
- NHP Access
- Regulatory framework would restrict people’s access to NHPs - NHP Cost
- High cost of product licenses for manufacturers (can small businesses afford it?) - GMPs
- Manufacturers felt they were too strict
- Guidelines are still being developed - Claims
- Many felt that if there is evidence to support a claim, even for a Schedule A disease, then it should be allowed
- Suggestion that HC develop policy guidelines differentiating types of claims (symptoms vs. cure) - Standards of Evidence
- Majority agreed that standards of evidence should be based on safety and use
- Public wants clear guidelines on how the standards will e applied - Adverse Reaction Reporting
- Public felt that consumers should be able to report adverse effects to government
- Via direct method such as a 1-800 #
- Outreach program will be needed to educate on what adverse effects are - Labelling
- Public wants more rather than less
- NNHPD needs to consider what information is required on product
- Challenges to fit everything in 2 languages - Capacity vs. Workload
- Public concerned that NNHPD would not have enough staff to process all applications
- Don’t want long delays
- Solution ⟶ monograph system (document of reference on all different NHPs; you don’t need applications for the health claim of an ingredient, just refer to monographs)
What is Schedule A? Discuss the rationale.
- Subsection 3(1) of the Food and Drugs Act
- List of diseases and disorders for which you are not allowed to advertise product effects for (eg. arthritis, asthma, liver disease, obesity, hypertension)
- Rationale: prevent claims directed to public about health issues that should be treated with medical professional rather than marketer
What are the implications of Schedule A?
- Holds up advancement of health claim policy advancement in Canada
- We do want to make health claims for NHPs!
- Was amended to allow for claims so it’s OK now!
The definition of Natural Health Products must ____ yet ___.
Draw a line between NHPs and foods/drugs
Yet be flexible to accomodate future products
What are the 2 components of the NHP definition?
- Function
- Refers to intent of NHP (health and self-care)
- Definition allows for full range of health claims - Substance
- Refers to actual content of NHP and what classifies a NHP
- Inclusion list (eg. plant materials, vitamins, minerals, probiotics)
- Exclusion list (eg. antibiotics, injections, Tobacco)
- Consider form of administration; typically capsule, pill, tablet, liquid, gum, or bar
- NHPs do NOT include conventional foods or products in food medium that might fall under definition
- Eg. OJ with phytosterols is a FOOD but phytosterol pill is NHP
- There is a limit of amount of vitamins/minerals you can put in a “food”