Rescorla Wagner and Blocking Flashcards

1
Q

what is a

A

learning rate parameter determined by the salience of CS;

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is B

A

learning rate parameter determined by the salience of the outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is (upside done v with a tail)

A

asymptote of associative strength (V). it has a positive value on episodes when the outcome is US with its magnitude being determined by the effectiveness of US.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is EV

A

sum of the associative strengths of all CSs present on the learning episode

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is (upside done v with a tail) - EV referred to as

A

prediction error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bear in mind that associative strength as computed by Rescorla-Wagner does not necessarily translate directly into responding –but we usually assume that the relationship between the two is

A

monotonic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when does the CS perfectly predict behaviour?

A

Trial X= 0.5 (1-1)= 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

example of blocking

A

Blocking happens when you start conditioning with one US and CS pairing (e.g. above with noise and foot shock). In the second stage, a novel CS (light) is added. There will be little or no fear in response to the light alone. It has been blocked. The light does not acquire any predictive value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

example of overshadowing

A

conditions start at the same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what happens here:

First trial = 0.5(1-0+0)= 0.5 = each stimulus gets 0.5

A

On the next trial, there is no more learning. They both stay with their 0.5 predictive strengths.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what does Beckers et al experiment 1 show

A

Experiment 1 demonstrated that under circumstances that result in robust blocking after irrelevant pretraining treatment, explicit exposure to subadditivity during pretraining effectively abolishes blocking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does Beckers et al experiment 3 show

A

Experiment 3 demonstrated that blocking is obtained more readily if the blocking procedure involves a shock intensity that is submaximal than if the blocking procedure involves the most intense shock intensity that animals have ever experienced, independent of the absolute intensity of the shock.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly