Chapter 3 Flashcards

1
Q

What is case law

A

Law made up of judgements written by judges giving their reasoning on their decision on the outcome of a case. It is then referred back to in future cases with similar facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the case of Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] in relation to case law

A

The judgements in this case created new law as there was no previous case with similar facts to refer back to. Tony Bland was involved in Hillsborough disaster and as a result was in a persistent vegetative state and being kept alive by artificial feeding and life support. The House of Lords had to decide whether or not to stop the feeding and chose to do so, which ultimately led to his death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How would a civil case be written if it occurred in 2017 between a Claimant named John Smith and Defendant named Anne Jones

A

Smith v Jones [2017]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In an appeal, which name comes first in the written citation

A

The Appellant, even if they were originally a Defendant. The original Claimant becomes the Respondent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How would a case regarding the estate of the deceased John Smith taking place in 2013 be written?

A

Re Smith [2013] or In the matter of Smith [2013] where ‘re’ and ‘in the matter of’ are interchangeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is a child’s name protected in citation

A

By using their initial, e.g. Re J (Transfer of Residence) [1999]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a conjoined case

A

When two cases with similar or same facts are heard simultaneously by the Court to save Court time. They are separated in citation by a semi-colon ;

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How are criminal cases written when cited and why?

A

R v surname of Defendant [year], where the ‘R’ refers to the Crown, being Regina (Queen) or Rex (King)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How are judicial review cases usually written and how has this changed more recently?

A

R v name of public body or gov. minister being challenged ex parte name of party commencing the case - so e.g. ‘R v Secretary of State for Education and Employment ex parte National Union of Teachers’. More recently the challenging party is after the name of the party they challenged in brackets, e.g.Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Bradley) [2004]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is the series of law reports containing a case cited

A

An abbreviation of the title of the report with the page number which the case starts on. sometimes a volume number is included if there is more than one. e.g. 3 All ER 234 would mean volume 3 of the All England Law Reports on page 234.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the neutral citation system and how are cases cited using it?

A

A more modern way of citing cases due to the growing use of internet databases, where the case is cited by the parties’ names, the year in square brackets, an abbreviation of the court and then the case number, e.g. Smith v Jones [1986] UKSC 56

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why might some cases have different citation years

A

If the outcome was decided towards the end of a year, some publishers may have been able to fit it in their report of that year while others would have had to include it in the following year

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the doctrine of stare decisis

A

When a Court holds that a certain set of facts leads to a certain outcome and this sets a precedent for future cases under the principle of fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Where does the Supreme Court hear appeals from

A

Court of Appeal (both divisions), and some cases from High Court or Divisional Court of the High Court if they have followed the ‘leapfrog’ procedure and bypassed the Court of Appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Where does the civil division of the Court of Appeal hear appeals from

A

Family Court, County Court, High Court, Divisional Court of the High Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Where does the criminal division of the Court of Appeal hear appeals from

A

Crown Court and Divisional Court of the High Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Where does the Divisional Court of the High Court hear appeals from

A

Family Court, County Court, Crown Court and Magistrates’ Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Where does the Crown Court hear appeals from

A

Magistrates’ Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the five Courts of ‘first instance’

A

The Family Court, County Court, High Court, Crown Court, Magistrates’ Court

20
Q

What is dealt with at a Magistrates’ Court and who is bound

A

Less important criminal cases and some civil law such as tax arrears. Does not create binding precedents

21
Q

What is dealt with at the County Court and who is bound

A

Less important civil cases. Does not create binding precedents.

22
Q

What is dealt with at the Crown Court and who is bound

A

More important criminal cases and some appeals from the Magistrates’ Court. Decisions may be persuasive but not binding.

23
Q

Who is bound by decisions of the High Court

A

Creates binding precedents for the County Court and is strongly persuasive for itself

24
Q

What is dealt with at the Divisional Court of the High Court and who is bound

A

Appeals from all first instance courts excluding the High Court (so Family Court, County Court, Crown Court, Magistrates’ Court) |It is bound by own decisions, and they are also binding on County Court, Crown Court & Magistrates’ Court

25
Q

What is dealt with at the Family Court and who is bound

A

It has its own hierarchy for internal appeals, and decisions are not binding on other courts but strongly persuasive on itself.

26
Q

What is dealt with at the Court of Appeal (civil division) and who is bound

A

Appeals from Family Court, County Court, High Court and Divisional Court of the High Court. Decisions are binding on all lower courts. Also binding on itself subject to 3 exceptions from Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co [1973] and 3 regarding EU Law

27
Q

What are the three exceptions established in Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co [1973] that stop Court of Appeal decisions being binding

A
  1. If two previous decisions conflict (the chosen one then becomes binding) 2. If a previous decision conflicts with one made by the Supreme Court or HoL their decision becomes binding 3. A decision thought to be made per incuriam (through carelessness) can be chosen not to be followed
28
Q

What is dealt with at the Court of Appeal (criminal division) and who is bound

A

Appeals from Crown Court and Divisional Court of the High Court. Decisions are binding on all lower courts, but only strongly persuasive on itself, as in criminal matters a fair individual result is viewed as more important than past decisions

29
Q

What was heard by the House of Lords (until Oct 2009), why would a case be given permission to appeal, and who is bound by their decisions

A

They heard civil appeals from all of UK and criminal from England Wales and Northern Ireland. Cases were only given permission to appeal if they were considered of ‘general public importance’. Decisions were strongly persuasive on self, and binding to all other Courts except Supreme Court.

30
Q

What is the Practice Statement (Judicial Decision as Authority: House of Lords) [1996]

A

Stated that if it was deemed ‘right to do so’ the House of Lords did not have to follow its previous decisions

31
Q

Describe the case of Shivpuri [1986] in relation to the Practice Statement

A

House of Lords decided not to follow its previous decision made in the similar case of Anderton v Ryan [1985] as they decided the Criminal Act 1981 had not been correctly interpreted

32
Q

What does the Supreme Court deal with, what are the Judges called and who is bound

A

All UK civil appeals, and criminal appeals from England Wales and NI. Judges are Lord and Lady Justices of the Supreme Court. Decisions are binding to all lower courts and strongly persuasive on itself. Follows the Practice Statement the same as the HoL

33
Q

Does the European Court of Human Rights make binding precedents

A

No, but they are strongly persuasive on all UK courts

34
Q

Does the Court of Justice of the European Union make binding precedents

A

Yes, their decisions are binding on all UK Courts (as per s3 of the European Committees Act 1972)

35
Q

What is dealt with by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and who is bound

A

They hear appeals from overseas UK territories and commonwealth countries, as well as some appeals made against professional bodies. Decisions are not binding but strongly persuasive on all UK courts as their Judges are Supreme Court Justices

36
Q

Describe the case of Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co (The “Wagon Mound”) in relation to decisions of the Privy Council

A

After an oil spillage in Sydney Harbour caused a fire, the matter was dealt with by the Privy Council. It set out important principles regarding the law of negligence and the decisions made in the case are followed by courts in England and Wales

37
Q

What is ratio decidendi

A

“The proposition of law which decides the case in the light or context of the material facts” - It is the binding element of the decision (the aspect of the case which was the reason for the Judge’s decision) and therefore is the aspect which is important in future cases

38
Q

Describe the case of Donogue v Stevenson [1932] particularly in relation to its ratio decidendi

A

In this case the claimant fell ill after drinking a drink sold by the defendant (to the claimant’s friend) which contained a decomposed snail. The HoL held in favour of the claimant and Lord Atkin gave a statement in which he stipulated that to love your neighbour in law was to take reasonable care to avoid an act or omission which may injure someone you can consider to be closely and directly affected by your act. This statement is considered the ratio decidendi of this case and has been used as the foundation of the law of negligence and in subsequent cases.

39
Q

What are obiter dicta

A

“words said by the way” - Legal discussion in a Judgement which is not needed for the case it deals with but is strongly persuasive for similar future cases. e.g. if the Judge discusses how the law may have been in different circumstances

40
Q

What is meant by ‘distinguishing’ case law in relation to the doctrine of judicial precedent

A

If a judge feels an earlier decision is legally flawed and that the application of an earlier binding decision onto a current case would be unjust and unacceptable, they can ‘distinguish’ the earlier case by explaining how the facts are different in a legally significant way and not be bound to follow the earlier decision.

41
Q

In which case was distinguishing used

A

Shivpuri [1986] - the H.o.L decided their earlier decision was flawed and chose not to follow it under the Practice Statement. The Crown Court and Court of Appeal also distinguished that the decision from the earlier case (Anderton v Ryan [1985]) was flawed and chose not to follow the ruling.

42
Q

What is meant by ‘overruling’ of case law

A

If a court decides an earlier decision is no longer good law, it can choose to overrule the decision - as long as it was made by itself or a lower court.

43
Q

What is meant by ‘disapproval’ in relation to the doctrine of judicial precedent

A

Similar to but less formal than overruling, a judge may disagree with an earlier case being raised by Barristers in a current case and so disapprove its use

44
Q

What is meant by ‘reversing’ and ‘upholding’ in relation to appeals and previous decisions

A

Reversion is when a higher court disagrees with a decision made by a lower court in an appeal and changes it (so the appellant wins). Upholding is when a higher court agrees with the decision of a lower court in an appeal (so the appellant loses).

45
Q

How did the Civil Partnership Act 2004 ‘tidy up’ the law

A

The creating of this Act amended the Rent Act 1977 so that same sex partners were entitled to take over a tenancy upon the death of their partner in the same way that different sex partners could. This meant the case law of Ghaidan v Godin Mendouza [2004] (in which the HoL had held that same sex partners could take over) was no longer valid.

46
Q

Why is case law not always valid for a long time

A

If the government decides the result of a case is unsatisfactory, they will amend the law by creating a new statutory instrument or amending the Act of Parliament so the law reflects its original intention and override the case law.