Coding, capacity and duration of memory Flashcards

1
Q

Coding

A

the process of converting information from one form to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did Alan baddeley do?

A

gave different lists of words to four groups of participants to remember and asked them to recall them in order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Baddeley group one

A
  • acoustically similar

- words sounded similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Baddeley group two

A
  • acoustically dissimilar

- words sounded different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Baddeley group three

A
  • semantically similar

- words with similar meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Baddeley group four

A
  • semantically dissimilar

- words that all had different meanings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Baddeley find?

A
  • when participants had to do the recall task immediately after hearing it (STM recall), they tended to do worst with acoustically dissimilar words
  • if participants were asked to recall the words after a time interval of 20 mins, they did worse with the semantically similar words
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Baddeleys findings suggest about coding in long term memory?

A

information is coded semantically In long term memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a limitation of Baddeleys study?

A
  • it used artificial stimuli rather than meaningful material as the word lists had no personal meaning to participants
  • this means we should be cautious about generalising the findings to different types of memory tasks
  • e.g. when processing more meaningful information, people may use semantic coding even for STM tasks
  • suggests that the findings have limited application
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

capacity

A

the amount of information that can be held in a memory store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Jacobs do?

A
  • developed a technique to measure digit span
  • e.g. the researcher gives the participants 4 digits to recall these in the correct order out loud. if this is correct, the researcher reads out 5 digits and so on until the participant cannot recall the order correctly
  • this determines the individuals digit span
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Jacobs find?

A
  • the mean span for digits across all participants was 9.3

- the mean span for letters was 7.3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Miller do?

A
  • made observations of everyday practice

- e.g. he noted that things come in sevens: 7 notes on musical scales, 7 days of the week, 7 deadly sins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did the number 7 mean in the study Miller?

A

-suggested that the capacity of STM is 7(+/-2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Miller find?

A
  • people can recall 5 words as well as 5 letters

- they do this by chunking, grouping sets of digits or letters into units or chunks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a limitation of Jacob’s study?

A
  • it was conducted a very long time ago
  • early research into psychology often lacked adequate control
  • e.g. some participants may have been distracted while they were being tested so they didn’t perform as well as they might of done
  • means that the results may not be valid because there were confounding variables that were not controlled
  • however results of this study have been confirmed in other research supporting its validity
17
Q

What is a limitation of Millers study?

A
  • Miller may have overestimated the capacity of STM
  • Cowan reviewed other research and concluded that he capacity of STM was only 4 chunks
  • suggests that the lower end of millers estimate (5 items) is more appropriate than 7 items
18
Q

Duration

A

the length of time information can be held in memory

19
Q

what was Peterson and Peterson study?

duration of STM

A
  • the student was given a consonant syllable to remember and was asked to count backwards from a 3 digit number
  • counting backwards was to prevent any mental rehearsal of the consonant syllable
  • on each trial, they were asked to stop after a different amount of times 3,6,9,12,15 or 18 seconds - called the retention interval
20
Q

What did Peterson and Peterson find?

A

-STM may have a very short duration, unless we repeat something over and over again

21
Q

What is a limitation of Peterson and Peterson’s study?

A
  • the stimulus material was artificial
  • trying to memorise constant syllables does not reflect most real life memory activities where what we try to remember is meaningful
  • therefore this study lacked external validity
22
Q

What was Bahrick et al study on duration of LTM?

A
  • studied 392 participants from Ohio aged from 17 to 74

- participants were given a photo recognition test from their high school yearbook consisting of 50 photos

23
Q

What did Bahrick et al find?

A
  • participants who were tested within 15 years pf graduation were approx 90% accurate in photo recognition
  • After 48 years, recall declined to 70%
  • shows that LTM lasts a long time
24
Q

What is a strength of Bahrick et al study?

A
  • higher external validity as real life memories were studied
  • when studies have been conducted on meaningless pictures to be remembered, recall was lower