9) Corporate Insolvency I Flashcards
(156 cards)
Principal statute dealing with corporate insolvency
Insolvency Act 1986
Amendment of IA1986
- Enterprise Act 2002 - promoted rescue of companies, and new admin procedure
- Small Business Enterprise and Employment Act 2015
- Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016
*Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020
Two key insolvency procedures introduced by IA 1986
Aim of corporate rescue
* Company voluntary arrangements
* Administration
Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 introduced
- Restructuring plan also aimed at rescuing the company
Meaning of insolvency
s122(1)(f) IA 1986
A company must be wound up “if it is unable to pay its debts”
Four tests of insolvency
- The Cash Flow Test (123(1)(e))
- The Balance Sheet Test (123(2))
- Failure to comply with a statutory demand for a debt of over £750 (123(1)(a))
- Failure to satisfy enforcement of a judgment debt (123(1)(b))
The most commonly used tests for insolvency
Cash flow test
Balance sheet test.
s123 (1) (e)
The cash flow test = an inability to pay debts as they fall due.
s123(2)
The balance sheet test = the company’s liabilities are greater than its assets.
s123(1)(a)
Failure to comply with a statutory demand for a debt of over £750
s123(1)(b)
Failure to satisfy enforcement of a judgement debt
Directors’ obligation in financial difficulties
Directors must review the financial performance of a company and recognize when it is facing financial difficulties
Directors have a duty to promote the success of the company for the benefit of the members as a whole
s172 CA 2006
Duty of directors in insolvency
Duty changes in cases of potential insolvency from members to creditors.
Interest of creditors are to be balanced alongside the interests of the members
Case that clarifies the interests of creditors against members
BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA
BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA
Principle
The further a company deteriorates and less likely it is to recover, more weight should be given to the interests of creditors.
Who can enforce a breach for not considering the interest of the creditors
The company, liquidator s or adminstrator
The duty is owed to the company, not the creditors and only the company can enforce the breach
BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA
Three principles - when to consider creditors
- Not when there is a risk of insolvency
- Duty engaged when
- Balance sheet or cash flow insolvent; Bordering on a state of insolvency; Likely to enter a formal insolvency process.
- Interests of creditors prevails where insolvent liquidation or administration is inevitable.
BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA
Case
- Liability for river pollution
- Dividend payment was allowed
- Did not amount to defrauding creditors.
- Scale of liability was uncertain
Options for a company facing financial difficult
- Do nothing
- Apply for pre-insolvency moratorium
- Do a deal
- Appoint an adminsitrator
- Put the company into liquidation
Options for a company facing financial difficult: Do nothing
Directors risk personal liability under IA 1986 and breach directors’ duties under the CA 2006
Options for a company facing financial difficult: Apply for a pre-insolvency moratorium
This gives the company some “breathing space”
Options for a company facing financial difficult: Do a deal
Reach either an informal or formal agreement with the company’s creditors with a view to rescheduling debts.
Options for a company facing financial difficult:
Appoint an administrator
Collective formal insolvency procedure which aims if possible to rescue the company.