9. Liability in Tort for Defective Products Flashcards
What are the usual elements of negligence which must be proven when a claimant is injured by a defective product?
- Duty or care
- Breach of duty
- Causation
Usual defences available.
What two conditions must be satisfied for a manufacturer to owe a duty of care in negligence to the end customer of that product?
- Manufacturer put the product into circulation in the form in which it is intended to reach the end consumer, and
- No reasonable expectation of an intermediate examination of the product before reaching the consumer
To whom will the manufacturer owe a duty in negligence?
Anyone whom it is reasonably foresee would be affected by a defect in the product
Who is the duty of care in negligence for a defective product owed by?
The person who manufactured the product, but the class of defendants can also extend to those who install/repair products
Will a retailer who merely supplies a product generally owe a common law duty of care?
No, unless they reasonably ought to have inspected the product for defects before supplying it
What is the extent of the duty of care in negligence for a defective product which will be owed by a manufacturer?
Personal injury caused by the product and economic loss consequential to the injury. And property damage.
Does the duty of care in negligence extend to damage caused to property by a defective product?
Yes, but damage caused to the defective product is specifically excluded and cannot be claimed for.
Are the usual negligence defences available?
Yes
What is the strict liability regime under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 for damage caused by defective products?
When damage is caused by a defect in a product in a consumer context, it is not necessary to prove that it arose because of fault on the part of the defendant, but it is still necessary to prove the defect
Who can claim under the CPA product liability regime?
Anyone who suffers damage caused by a defect: not limited to people who purchased the product as would usually be the case in a contractual claim), nor even limited to people who used the product.
NB: business losses cannot be recovered under the CPA.
What three categories of parties may be a defendant under the CPA regime?
- Manufacturer/producer of the product
- Any person who held themselves out as a manufacturer/producer of the product by putting their own mark on it, and
- Any person who imported the product to supply it in their course of business
Under the CPA regime, what is the liability of each defendant where there are two or more defendants?
Joint and several
What three conditions must be satisfied for a supplier to be liable under the CPA regime?
- Person who suffered damage requests identity of producer within a reasonable time
- Not reasonably practicable for the claimant to identify the producer on their own, and
- Supplier fails to identify the producer (or its own supplier) within a reasonable time
Under the CPA regime, when is a product defective?
When its safety is not of the standard people generally are entitled to expect
- higher standard of expectation than in negligence. Wider than ‘reasonable care.’
In determining whether a product’s safety is not of the expected standard and therefore defective, what will be taken into account?
- The manner and purposes for which it was marketed
- What might reasonably expect to be done with/ in relation to the product
- Instructions and warning provided
- The time of supply (e.g., mobile phones changing consumer base)