Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

FL & Fed Const Law Bar Exam 2020 > First Amendment - Freedom of Speech > Flashcards

First Amendment - Freedom of Speech Flashcards

1
Q

Freedom of Speech Checklist

A
  1. Is the Type of Speech Protected?
    • No - Apply the std. for that type of speech
    • Yes - Proceed to the next question
  2. Is the Restriction Content Based (Time, Place, Manner Restriction)?
    • Yes - Apply Strict Scrutiny
    • No - Proceed to next question
  3. Where is the Speech Taking Place? - Public Forum, Limited Pub. Forum or non pub. forum
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Regulation of Protected Speech

A

“Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech”

  • Made applicable to states & Local gov’t through 14th Amendment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Regulation of Protected Speech - Content Based Regulation

A

Strict Scrutiny

  • Restrictions must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling gov’t interest (speech restrictions rarely survive Strict Scrutiny)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Regulation of Protected Speecch - Content Based Regulations

Types of Content Based Restrictions

A

Types of Content Based Restrictions

  • Subject Matter Restriction - Application of law depends on the SM of the speech OR
  • Viewpoint Restriction - Application of the law depends on the ideology of the message (e.g. Speech that criticizes the gov’t)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Regulation of Protected Speecch - Content Neutral Regulations

Defined & Level of Scrutiny

A

Intermediate Scrutiny

  • Restrictions must be substantially related to an important gov’t interest

Laws that apply to all speech regulating the time, place or manner of the speech regardless of content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Regulation of Protected Speecch - Content Neutral Regulations

Public Forums

A

Gov’t property the gov’t is constitutionally required to make avail. for speech

  • Test - To be held constitutional, the regulation must:
    1. Content Neutral
      • Subj. Matter Neutral - If not, Strict Scrutiny must be met AND
      • Viewpoint Neutral - If not, strict scrutiny must be met
    2. Time, Place or Manner Restriction
    3. Serve Important Gov’t interest (such as noise control or traffic control)
    4. Be Narrowly Tailored to That Gov’t Int. (But doesn’t need to be least restrictive alt) AND
    5. Leave Open & Alt. Channels of Communication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Regulation of Protected Speecch - Content Neutral Regulations

Public Forum - Fees

A

Permit Fees

  • No discretion Permitted
  • Unconst. for gov’t official to have discretion over setting fee for pub. demonstration permits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Regulation of Protected Speecch - Content Neutral Regulations

Limited Public Forum

A

(Same Std. as Public Forums)

Pub. Prop. no historically avail. for speech but that gov’t has opened for speech (Expressive use) through practice or policy

  • E.g. Pub. school facilities, space on city buses used for posting placecards
  • Gov’t can enact time, place, manner restrictions on prop. that gov’t can close to speech but chooses to leave open to the pub. only if it meets the same std. as for pub. forum. (i.e. interm. scrutiny and leave open alt. channels of co.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Regulation of Protected Speecch - Content Neutral Regulations

Non-Public Forums

A

Gov’t can const. reg. speech on gov’t prop. that gov’t const. can & does close to speech IF it meets the rational basis test and is viewpoint neutral

  • Military bases, areas outside prison, advertising space on pub bus, sidewalks on post office prop., airports)

Rational Basis Test

  • Rat. rel. to legit. gov’t int. (Reas. when considering purp. served by forum) AND
  • Viewpoint Neutral
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Regulation of Protected Speecch - Content Neutral Regulations

Private Property

A

Theres no 1st amend. right to access private prop. for speech purp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech

Government Officials Speech

A

1st amend. doesn’t protect speech by gov’t or made on the job in the scope of their duties

  • Only restricts gov’t ability to reg. private speech
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - True Threats

A

Threatening communication that can be prosecuted under the law (Cross-burning in south)

  • SCOTUS held true threats NOT protected Under 1st amend based on 3 justifications:
    • Preventing fear,
    • Preventing the disrupting that follows from that fear, and
    • Diminishing the likelihood that the threatened violence will occur
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - True Threats

Fighting Words

A

All laws prohib. fighting words are unconst. vague & overbroad

  • Insults directed to the hearer that are likely to provoke an ord. pers. to violence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - Imminent Lawless Action

A

Gov’t can punish speech if theres subst. likelihood of imm. lawless action & speaker intended to cause the imm. lawless action

  • Purpose of speech is directed to Cause Imm. Lawless Action AND
  • Speech has Subst. Likelihood to incite or produce such action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - Defamation & Libel

What does regulation depend on?

A

Regulation depends on subj. & Subj. matter of speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - Defamation & Libel

Public Officials & Public Figures

A

Can recover only if statement was False & pers. who made it acted w/ actual malice

  • Knowledge statement is false OR Reck. disreg. as to whether statement is true or false
  • Actual Malice - Knowledge st. is false OR reck. disregard as to whether st. is T or F
  • Burden of Proof - Clear & Convincing Ev. - ∏ must show elements w/ clear & convincing ev.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - Defamation & Libel

Private Figures & Matter of Public Concern

A

Can recover if statement was false & person who made it acted w/ actual Malice

  • Punitive Dam - NEED actual Malice
    • Plaintiff must show actual malice to recover punitive dam.
  • Burden of Proof - Plaintiff must show elem. w/ C&C Ev.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - Defamation & Libel

Private Figures & NOT Matter of Public Concern

A

Requires:

  1. False Statement AND
  2. Negligence

Punitive Damages - OK

  • NO Malice required

Burden of Proof

  • ▵ bears burden to prove truth of the statement
19
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - Obscenity

What is the test ?

A

Miller Test For Obscenity - Speech is consid. obscene & not protected under the 1st Amendment if it describes or depicts sexual conduct that:

  1. Appeals to Prurient Interest
    • Whether avg. pers., applying community std. would find work (as a whole) appeals to Prurient Int.
    • Shameful/morbid int. in sex (co. std.)
  2. Whether work depicts/describes in Patently Offensive
    • sexual conduct or execretory functions specifically defined by applic. law (Fed/st/local) AND
  3. Lacks Serious Literary, Artistic, Political or Scientific Value
    • nat’l std. not local
20
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - Obscenity

Adult Bookstores & Movie Theaters

A
  • Gov’t can use zoning ord. to reg. location.
  • Gov’t has import. int. in preserving character of its neighborhoods
21
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - Obscenity

Child Pornography

A

Doesn’t have to be obscene to be prohib.

  • BUT must actually use kids
22
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - Obscenity

Private Possession of Obscene Material

A

Can’t be Reg.

  • EXCEPTION - Child Porn
23
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - Obscenity

Obscene, Profane, & Indecent Speech

A

Protected by 1st amend.

  • Profane & Indecent speech isn’t obscene & is protected by 1st Amend.
  • Exceptions: Broadcast Media & Schools
24
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - Commercial Speech

General Rule

A

Truthful com. speech can be reg. only if reg. meets interm. scrutiny

  1. Serves Subst. Gov’t Purp.
  2. Restriction Directly Advances That import. gov’t Int. AND
  3. Narrowly Tailored to that Int. - Restriction isn’t subst. more extensive than nec. to protect that int.
    • Restriction must be narrowly tailored but doesn’t have to be least restrictive alt
25
Q

Regulation of Unprotected Speech - Commercial Speech

Unprotected Commercial Speech

A

SCOTUS precedent est. that 1st amend. doesn’t protect commercial speech that is:

  • false or misleading (Unlawful Activity OR Misleading or Fraudulent)
26
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Anonymous Speech

A

Protected by 1st amendment

27
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Campaign Contributions

Corporations

A

Corporation Can’t be treated Dif. - SCOTUS held corp. can’t be treated less favorable than indiv.

  • As long as corp. act indep. of the candidate, Congress can’t prohib. corp. from using their funds to pay political advertising
28
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Campaign Contributions

Elections for Office

A

Contributions made by indiv. or groups to indiv. candidates, PACs or pol. parties can be limited to dollar amt.

  • BUT the limits can’t subst. interfere w/ a candidates or pol. party’s ability to run a competitive campaign
  • Expenditure Limits = Unconst.
29
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Campaign Contributions

Ballot Initiatives

A

Both contrib. limits & expenditure limits are unconst. for ballot initiatives

30
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Symbolic Speech

A

Expressive Conduct

  • Where the medium itself is the message (flag burning)
  • Protected by free speech clause of 1st amend.
31
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Symbolic Speech

Requirements for Expressive Conduct

A
  1. protester intended to co. a message AND
  2. Aud. was likely to understand the communication
32
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Symbolic Speech

Requirements for Gov’t Regulation

A

Gov’t can reg. speech if:

  1. Important Interest Unrelated to Suppression of Message - i.e law prohibits the noncomunicative aspects of the act in question AND
  2. Narrowly Tailored to Further a Subst. Gov’t Int. - i.e. impact on communication no greater than nec.
33
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Symbolic Speech

Constitutionally Protected Symbolic Speech

A
  1. Flag Burning
  2. Cross Burning - protected symbolic speech unless theres ev. of intent to threaten or intimidate
34
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Symbolic Speech

Constitutionally Unprotected Symbolic Speech

A
  • Draft Card Burning
  • Nude Dancing
35
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Prior Restraint

A

Gov’t Action (Judicial order or admin. system) that restricts free speech in advance of publication & is gen. invalid

36
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Prior Restraint

License or Permit for Speech

A

for licensing to be held const. there must be:

  1. Important reason for licensing
  2. Clear Criteria Leaving no Discretion - clear criteria for granting licenses or permits for speech that leave no discretion w/ the licensing auth. AND
  3. Procedural Safeguards - Such as prompt determination & judicial review of denials
37
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Prior Restraint

Court Orders

A

Ct. orders suppressing speech b/f it occurs must meet strict scrutiny

  • Procedurally Proper Ct. Order must be complied with until order is over
    • Any pers. who violates this is barred from challenging its constitutionality later on
  • Gag Orders on Press to prevent prejudicial pre-trial publicity are unconst.
38
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Vagueness

A

Due Process requires a statute to be clear enough that a pers. of ord. intelligence will understand what the statute prohibits

  • Statute is vague if reas. pers. can’t tell what speech is prohib. & what is permitted
39
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Overbreadth

A

A law is unconst. overbroad if it punishes speech thats const. protected

40
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Privacy Issues

Accurate Publication of Information in Public Record

A

State can impose liab. for the accurate publication of info in the public record (e.g. disclosure of rape vic. ID)

41
Q

Freedom of Speech Issue - Privacy Issues

Illegal Eavesdropping

A

Publisher who gets truthful info thats a matter of pub. concern in a lawful manner can’t be pub. if they got it from a source who go it unlawfully

42
Q

Freedom of Speech Issues - Public Schools

A

Schools have greater leeway to regulate the speech of students & teachers than the state would have outside the school context

  • SCOTUS held that pub. schools can’t force students to participate in a flag salute/pledge ceremony when it offends the political or religious beliefs of the student or their families
43
Q

When can public school children be disciplined for speech?

A

When the speech is potentially disruptive

44
Q

When can a newspaper publish offensive information?

A

When it is truthful and newsworthy

FL & Fed Const Law Bar Exam 2020 (18 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions