Cvx Ca Flashcards

1
Q

Previously treated Cvx ca pts in basket phII KEYNOTE-158 study of pembrolizumab:
PDL-1 positivity
Response rate among PDL-1
Time to response and % responding at 9 and 12 months

A

PDL-1 positivity (CPS=,>1): 84%

Response rate among PDL-1: ORR - 15% (12pts)

Time to response: 2 m

% responding at 9 and 12 months: 91 and 80%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

SUCCOR study: rate of 🔄 in MIS cohort who had protective vaginal closure?

A

3/43=7% 🔄 at 4.5 years = laparotomy

25% 🔄 rate among MIS w/o vaginal closure

In LACC: 3.5% 🔄 rate in Xlap at 4.5 y; power calculations were done for 10% rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

% if CIN3 progressing to cancer?

A

12-40%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rate of recurrent CIN2/3 after excisional or ablative tax?

A

5-17%

~size of lesion
~endocervical glands involvement
~positive margins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sexual functioning at 12 months after NSRH via TL vs XLap per Ceccaroni’s retrospective cohort study 2021?

A

No difference between approaches

87% recovered sexual activity: of those recovered, 72% considered it “satisfactory” (only 17% had XRT)

whereas in “unsatisfactory sexual quality” group - 80% had XRT p<0.001

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Main difference after NSRH via TL vs XLap per Ceccaroni’s retrospective cohort study 2021 (Raspagliesi open technique)?

A

Urinary incontinence and voiding difficulties persistent at 12 and 24 months

14 vs 26% and 10 vs 25% p<0.01

0 vs 5.5% rate of complete urinary retention w/ XLap

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Voiding dysfunction ~ type of parametrectomy in prospective SENTIX trial: 300 pts/47sites/18EU countries?

A
Predictors of voiding recovery >7d in multivariate analysis:
SH - reference
B- 4.7
C1- 3.6
C2- 5.8

with 98% recovering within a month
5/7 recovering longer had catheter due to urinary complications

No difference between C1s Lap vs. XLAP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Catheter management after RH ~ parametrectomy and previous pregnancy (OR 0.3; p-0.033) in prospective SENTIX trial: 300 pts/47sites/18EU countries?

A

Should attempt removal based on median successful time for:
B and C1:
nulliparous - POD#2
previous pregnancy - POD#4

C2: POD#6

If PVR 50-150: reassess in 1-2 days;
If PVR >150: catheter + reassess in 1-2 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Recurrent or metastatic squamous cvx/vulva/vaginal ca who are HPV + or unknown, being part of phI-II CheckMate 358 Trial of Nivolumab (Ig PD-1i): (63% of tu >1% PD-L1 expression): ORR- SD? Median duration of response? Discontinuation rate?

A

ORR- SD: 26-42%

Median duration of response: 23m

Discontinuation rate: 5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Radical trachelectomy vaginally - systematic review: 21 series/1364🙎‍♀️: 🔄 rate ~ tumor size:

A

> 2 cm: 17%

< 2 cm: 4%

2% of patients with 🔄 died

UpToDate 11/2021

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Radical trachelectomy: ideal margin?

A

Should be at least 10 mm per MRI, to ensure at least 5 mm per final pathology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cone for fertility preservation in cvx ca: size cut off?

A

< 1 cm tumors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Pregnancy outcomes in 50🙎‍♀️ (2007-2020) undergoing simple trachelectomy and LN assessment for cvx ca <2 cm size?

A
40 🤰:
12% 1/3 SAB
2.5% 2/3 SAB
7.5% 3🧑‍🍼late preterm
75% delivered at >36ga
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Oncologic outcomes in 50🙎‍♀️ (2007-2020) undergoing simple trachelectomy and LN assessment for cvx ca <2 cm size?

A

Median follow up: 76 months

1🔄 leading to exenteration and cancer ✝️

5y PFS and OS: 98%

Int J Gyn Ca 2020; 30(7):981

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Parametrial extension in cvx ca <2cm: probability?

A

<1%.

UpToDate 11/2021

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ConCerv - oncologic outcomes?
prospective, single arm study: 100🙎‍♀️; (2010-2019) of =|< 2cm cvx ca w/ no LVSI, <10 mm depth of invasion and negative conization margins (>1 mm and no AIS or >CIN2) w/ 96% of patiens undergoing MIS;

A

Oncologic outcomes ~ tx:

5% LN+

🔄 rate:
2y PFS of 95%:
0/36 for cone + hyst/LND
2.4% (1/42) cone + LND (invasion >10 mm and dysplasia at margin)
12.5% (2/16) inadvertent hyst + LND
17
Q

s. Ib3 cvx ca, fertility preservation: risk of LN involvement?

A

10-15%

18
Q

s. Ib3 cvx ca, fertility preservation: oncologic and obstetric outcomes of NACT/VRT vs ART? similar attempt to conceive at 40%; per UpToDate 11/2021

A

🤰 rate among attempting: 70 vs 21%

live birth 🧑‍🍼: 63 vs 43% of pregnancies

🔄 rate: 10 vs 7%

✝️ rate: 2.9 vs 3.4%

19
Q

How long was the tx (all q3wks) in KEYNOTE-826 w/ Paclitaxel 175
Cisplatin 50mg/m2
or Carbo AUC 5
Pembrolizumab 200mg
+/- bevacizumab 15mg/kg

A

Pembrolizumab up to cycle #35

Chemo: 6 cycles, but could continue longer if clinical benefit, no side effects and approved by the sponsor

20
Q

% of patients using opioids at 3 & 6 months after XRT: risk factors?

A

3m - 29%
6m - 25%

> h/o substance abuse - OR: 6
depression and anxiety - OR: 6

21
Q

PALN chimney - extended field RT to T12 or L1: toxicity?

A

GOG study of 95🙋‍♀️ from 1998:
3y PFS and OS: 34 and 39% respectively

g3 GI toxicity at 19% vs. 21 and 28% for g3&4 in RTOG study of 29 pts with Cis75 and bid XRT

late morbidity at 4y: 14%

22
Q

LND at RH: extensiveness for early cvx after SENTIX study in ESGOg 2023?

A

if SNL frozen is negative - only level I LND

only 2% (N-355 SENTIX) had isolated LNm at level II, cranially to iliac bifurcation