Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Law > Elements of Crime > Flashcards

Elements of Crime Flashcards

1
Q

What is Actus Reus

A

The physical part of a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Will D’s conduct have to be voluntary or involuntary to be found guilty.

A

Voluntary. An involuntary act is one done by the muscles without any control by the mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is an omission

A

Not acting/Failing to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the general rule of omissions

A

That there is no liability for an omission (i.e. You aren’t responsible if you don’t act)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the exception to the omissions rule.

A

A person is only liable for an omission if they have a duty to act and they fail to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a duty

A

A responsibility to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 5 types of duty

A
  • Contractual
  • Relationship
  • Assuming Responsibility Voluntarily
  • Public Office
  • Creating a dangerous situation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the case for contractual duty

A

R v Pittwood - D worked on the railway. A man was killed after D forgot to close the gates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the case for relationship duty

A

R v Gibbins and Proctor - A father and his partner killed their child by starving her

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the case for assuming responsibility voluntarily duty

A

R v Stone and Dobinson - D chose to care for his elderly sister but she died after poor treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the case for public office duty

A

R v Dytham - A police officer watched a fight happen and a man died.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the case for creating a dangerous situation duty

A

R v Miller - D dropped a cigarette and it started a fire that he failed to alert anyone about.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the two types of causation

A

Factual and Legal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the test for factual causation

A

‘But for’ test - Proves whether or not V’s consequences would have happened without D’s conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the two cases for factual causation

A
  • R v Pagett - V would not have been harmed

- R v White - V would have been harmed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the test for legal causation

A

‘Operative and substantial’ cause test - Prvoes whether or not D’s conduct was a significant cause of V’s consequences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the case for legal causation

A

R v Smith

R v Cheshire gave us the de minimus rule which stated D’s actions must be more than a minimal cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When will intervening acts break the chain of causation

A

If they are unreasonable and unforeseeable

19
Q

What are the 3 types of intervening acts

A
  • Acts of a third party
  • Acts of the victim
  • Acts of god
20
Q

What are the cases for acts of a third party

A
  • R v Pagett - D was still significant cause

- R v Jordan - D wasn’t significant cause as doctors acted palpably wrong

21
Q

What are the cases for acts of the victim

A

R v Roberts - V jumped out a car after D made sexual advances
R v Williams - V jumped out a car after D asked to see her wallet

22
Q

What are some examples of acts of god

A
  • Volcanic eruption
  • Lightning
  • Earthquake
23
Q

What is the thin skull rule

A

A rule that means the chain of causation is not broken. This is because the victim was more vulnerable e.g. allergy.

24
Q

What kind of conditions does the rule apply to

A
  • Physical conditions e.g. brittle bones

- Psychiatric conditions e.g. mental illnesses

25
Q

What case did the thin skull rule come from

A

R v Blaue - V refused a blood transfusion due to their religion and died. D was liable for the death despite not meaning to kill V.

26
Q

What is mens rea

A

The mental part of a crime. It refers to D’s state of mind whilst committing the crime.

27
Q

What are the two types of mens rea

A
  • Intention - Direct/Indirect Intent

- Recklessness

28
Q

What is direct intent

A

Where D set out to cause the consequence

29
Q

What case did direct intent come from

A

Mohan - the judge said direct intent is when there is a decision to bring about a consequence.

30
Q

What is indirect intent

A

When D’s conduct will obviously cause harm, even if D didn’t want the consequence to happen

31
Q

What case is used for indirect intent

A

R v Woollin - D tried to throw his baby into the pram but missed and it hit the wall

32
Q

What is the test for indirect intention

A
  1. The consequence of D’s conduct was virtually certain

2. D realised the consequence was virtually certain

33
Q

What is the test for recklessness

A

3r test - D realises there is a risk involved in his conduct, but carries on regardless

34
Q

When will medical treatment break the chain of command

A

When the treatment is palpably wrong (R v Jordan)

35
Q

What is the structure to prove causation

A
  • Explain factual causation
  • Apply ‘but for’ test (with case its similar to)
  • Say whether factual causation is proven or not
  • Explain legal causation (state case its from)
  • State ‘de minimus’ rule from R v Cheshire
  • Say whether legal causation is proven
  • State and explain any intervening acts
  • Say the case the intervening act relates to
  • Say if it breaks the chain of causation
  • Say if D is the legal cause or not
36
Q

What is the test for direct intent?

A

Whether or not D made a decision to cause V’s consequences

37
Q

What car did recklessness come from

A

R v Cunningham

38
Q

What is transferred malice?

A

When D intended to commit a crime on one person, but actually commits it on someone else.

39
Q

What is the case for transferred malice?

A

R v Latimer - D intended to hit X with a belt but ended up hitting X and V
R v Pembliton - D threw a stone trying to hit some people but missed and hit a car

40
Q

What is the principle of coincidence?

A

For an offence to take place the defendant usually needs both the actual reus and mens rea of the offence and they need to be present at the same time

41
Q

What is the single transaction theory?

A

When D has the men’s era before the actual reus, the mens rea can be extended to any acts in a chain of events

42
Q

What is the case for single transaction theory?

A

R v Thabo Meli

43
Q

What is continuing act

A

When D has the actus reus before the mens rea, the actus reus can continue until the mens rea occurs

44
Q

What is the case for continuing act

A

Fagan v MPC

Law (43 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions