Wk6b-Bilateral CI's (II) Flashcards

1
Q

When testing sound localization in NH individuals, Kerber and Seeber found that as SNR decreases, performance ______ (decreases/increases)

A

Decreases - anything more lateral than 40 degrees was still estimated to be at 40 degrees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When the localization experiment by Kerber and Seeber was repeated with Unilateral CI users, they found that CI users nearly always perceive sounds as coming from ______ and showed ____ (better/worse) discrimination with decreased SNR

A

0 degrees, or the front

Worse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How did bilateral CI users do in good SNR conditions compared to NH listeners and unilateral CI users?

A

Bilat CI users did well - better than unilateral CI users and almost as well as NH listeners - in good SNRs, but very poor in poor SNR environments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why do bilateral CI users experience difficulty localizing sound?

A

Automatic Gain Control, Adaptive Sound Window, and n-of-m operate independently in L and R CI
- the CI outputs will even out the inputs, even though the inputs were originally very different (cannot use ILD cues)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does binaural technology in hearing aids include? How does it help with localization?

A
  1. Identical program selection
  2. Identical compression (which helps maintain ILDs)
  3. Identical directionality (polar plots)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In bilateral CIs, we should have more than identical program selection and compression to help with localization. What else should be included?

A
  • Identical Adaptive Sound Window
  • Identical n-of-m selection
  • Let the sound processor exploit the binaural squelch
  • ITD enhancement (if possible)
  • Manipulate the ILD to make it as linear as possible (e.g. 90 degrees)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When was the first binaural CI (by advanced bionics) put on the market? What binaural processing did it have?

A

2018

  • identical program selection
  • identical compression (helps with ILDs)
  • Identical Adaptive Sound Window
  • > let the sound processor exploit the binaural squelch
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe a binaural implant

A

A device with one internal component that has 2 electrode arrays (a short ipsi one, and a longer contra one)

  • one speech processor on ipsi side processes the acoustic information from the same side AND from the remote mic on the other side
  • by using one speech processor, this device can synchronously stimulate the electrodes on both sides
  • surgery is difficult
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does “FAST” stand for?

A

Fundamental Asynchronous Stimulus Timing

  • it is a strategy that presents a pulse at each envelope maximum at each channel (usually at ~100-200 pps)
  • the interaural timing difference is visible in the final output, so can now be exploited by the LSO
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

HA users can use their binaural system, including their cochlear amplifier, to help with sound localization. CI users cannot, and so must rely on their ___ _____.

A

Sound Processor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a fixed minimum variance distortionless response (as seen in the Baumgartel paper comparing NH, HI, and CI user performance using technology in different listening situations)?

A

A beam former; It is a spatial filtering technique aimed at minimizing the noise power output while preserving target speech components

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Baumgartel et al found that ______ (NH/HI/CI users) benefited most from binaural pre-processing

A

CI users

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does the “cone of confusion” refer to?

A

The fact that ITDs and ILDs only provide us with spatial cues related to the lateral angle
- e.g. a sound in the lower front and upper front generate the same ITDs and ILDs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does the pinna affect sound localization?

A

The pinna alters sounds differently by frequency depending on if they are coming from the front, back, above, etc.

  • helps localize the sound source in the vertical plane
  • mostly visible with high frequencies (above 4000 Hz)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The ____, torso, and ____ act as directionally-dependent acoustical filters, characterized as ____-_____ ____ _____ or ______ ______ _______

A

Head; pinna
Head-related transfer functions (HRTFs)
Directional Transfer Functions (DTFs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Name 3 reasons CI users might have trouble with up/down, front/back localization

A
  • poor spectral resolution (lack of temporal fine structure)
  • insufficient processor bandwidth (only up to 8kHz)
  • BTE mic placement doesn’t capture directional info b/c the pinna is not used
17
Q

When testing localization by a bilateral CI user, what were the most common mistakes?

A

Sometimes they would correctly perceive sounds from the front as coming from the front, but sometimes they would perceive them as coming from the back (180 degrees azimuth instead of 0 degrees), and vice versa.
- this is b/c there is not a lot of difference in the 0 degree and 180 degree DTFs BELOW 8kHz (CI cutoff)

18
Q

What are some of the alternative to improve binaural hearing at the following processing stage:
-BTE mics
(spectral cues)

A
  • pinna mics
19
Q

What are some of the alternative to improve binaural hearing at the following processing stage:
-12-22 band-pass filters 0-9kHz
(spectral cues)

A
  • virtual channels
20
Q

What are some of the alternative to improve binaural hearing at the following processing stage:
- acoustic speech enhancement and directional filters
(ITDs/ILDs)

A
  • binaural beamformers, binaural cue preservation

- applying optimized binaural cues at electrodogram level

21
Q

What are some of the alternative to improve binaural hearing at the following processing stage:
Envelope extraction
(ITDs)

A

Carrier phase related pulse (burst) timing

22
Q

What are some of the alternative to improve binaural hearing at the following processing stage:
- Compression, AGC, dynamic range optimization
(ILDs)

A

Binaurally coordinated

23
Q

What are some of the alternative to improve binaural hearing at the following processing stage:
- continuous sampling
(ITDs)

A

Smart sparse sampling

24
Q

What are some of the alternative to improve binaural hearing at the following processing stage:
-n-of-m selection
(ILDs)

A

binaurally coordinated

25
Q

What are some of the alternative to improve binaural hearing at the following processing stage:
- output current and frequency mapping
(ITDs and ILDs)

A
  • binaural fitting
26
Q

What are some of the alternative to improve binaural hearing at the following processing stage:
- monopolar biphasic pulses
(spectral cues and ITDs)

A
  • tripolar stimulation

- multipolar stimulation