Randomisation Flashcards

1
Q

essence of randomization

A

based purely on chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2 elements

A
  1. creating a randomization scheme (before the start of a study)
  2. allocating patients to intervention or control group (once patients start to participate in the study)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

simple randomization

A

like throwing a dice
issues:
- uneven groups/ imbalance (not 50/50)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how to solve imbalance with simple randomization

A

use block randomization:

essence: after every block, balance is 50/50
- you can choose the size of the block (after e.g. 6/8 etc. the groups are even)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

problem with block size of 2

A

predictable, after the first randomization outcome, you know what the second one will be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

problems with large blocks

A

if you stop recruiting earlier than expected, you have uneven groups again (e.g., block of 200 –> 100 in intervention, 50 in control)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

best block size

A

vary block size randomly, e.g., between 2 and 4 (then even when you’re in a block size of 2 atm, you don’t know that, so you don’t know the outcome of the next person)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

creating a randomization scheme

A
  • use block randomization

- with randomly varying block size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

problem of unequal distribution of variables

A

-problematic if they are prognostic factors (e.g., if gender is associated with the effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when stratification?

A

when you expect a variable to be strongly related to effect (i.e. prognostic factor) –> to ensure equal distribution of this variable

  • not really necessary in large trials, because you expect variables to be distributed equally (known and unknown prognostic factors)
  • use sparsely, mainly with strong prognostic factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how stratification? procedure

A
  1. determine the variables you want to use
  2. determine the number of groups (stratum/ strata) for each variable
    - not continuous! groups! e.g. age: 18-40, 41-60, 60+ (3 strata)
  3. calculate total number go groups/ strata, e.g. 2 variables with 2 strata –> 4 total number of strata
  4. create a randomization scheme for each of the groups/ strata: e.g. 4 randomization schemes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

problem with stratification

A

you quickly have too many strata: 4 variables with 2 groups results into 16 strata!

  • -> too complicated
  • -> you need a huge sample
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

minimisation

A

another way of randomization
- the chance on intervention/ control depends on characteristics of those already assigned, e.g. all women are assigned to intervention group –> chance of next women to draw control group is increased (best used when you have more factors to randomize on)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

allocating patients: what is that?

A
  • after eligibility screen –> allocation
    (patients enter RCT gradually!)
  • allocation needs to be blinded! might create bias, if person screening for eligibility knows the next allocation outcome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

allocating patients steps

A
  1. independent person stores randomization scheme
  2. researcher includes patient
  3. researcher asks independent person to reveal randomization outcome (=allocates the next patient)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

randomization and group therapies

A
  • patients have to wait until they are enough people in the group to start with the treatment (not a problem with quick inclusion rate)
    solutions:
  • start with people who are not in your study
  • collaborate with different centers
  • smaller group sizes
    –> measure people again before they start treatment, so you can see what happened while they waited