SLT: Obedience Flashcards

1
Q

What is obedience?

A

A form of social influence in which an individual follows a direct order. The person issuing the order is usually a person of authority who has the power to punish when obedient behaviour is not forthcoming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Milgram’s baseline procedure

A
  • 40 American men volunteered to be part of a study at Yale university
  • When each volunteer arrived at the lab, he was introduced to another volunteer (confederate). They drew lots to see who would be teacher and who would be learner but the draw was fixed so volunteer would always be the teacher.
  • Teacher could not see learner but hear him
  • Teacher had to give learner electric shock every time learner made a mistake on memory task
  • Shocks increased by 15 volts each time up to 450 volts
  • Shocks were fake but volunteer did not know this
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Baseline findings

A

Every participant delivered a voltage up to 300. 12.5% of participants stopped at 300. 65% continued to highest level. Milgram also collected qualitative data including observations like participants showed signs of extreme tension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Conclusions

A

Milgram concluded German people were not ‘different’. The American participants in his study were willing to obey orders even when they might harm another person. He suspected there were certain factors in the situation that encouraged obedience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why did Milgram conduct this experiment?

A

He sought an answer to the question to why such a high proportion of German population obeyed Hitlers commands that led to murder 6 million Jews in the Holocaust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evaluation of Milgram’s research

A

Low internal validity - 75% of patients said they believed the shocks were genuine. 2/3 of these were disobedient. Participants may have shown demand characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Alternative interpretation of Milgram’s theory

A

According to social identity theory participants in Milgram’s study only obeyed when they identified with scientific aims of the research. When they refer ordered to blindly obey an authoritative figure they refused.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ethical issues with Milgram’s experiment

A

Participants were deceived, e.g. the allocation of teacher and learner roles was random but in fact was fixed. Also thought the shocks were real. Milgram dealt with this by debriefing participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are situational variables?

A

Features of the immediate physical and social environment which may influence a person’s behaviour (such as proximity, location etc).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are dispositional variables?

A

Behaviour is explained in terms of personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Milgram situational variables: Proximity

A

In baseline study, teacher could hear learner but not see him. In proximity variation teacher and learner were in the same room. Caused obedience to decrease from original 65% to 40% Because participant felt more responsible for the consequences of their actions so obedience decreased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Milgram situational variables: Touch proximity

A

Teacher had to force learners hand onto electric shock plate when he refused to answer a question Obedience dropped to 30% Because participant felt more responsible for the consequences of their actions so obedience decreased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Milgram situational variables: Remote instruction variation

A

Experimenter left the room and gave instructions to teacher by the phone. Obedience dropped to 20.5% and participants often pretended to give shocks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Milgram situational variables: Uniform

A

In baseline study, experimenter wore a grey lab coat as a symbol of authority. In variation, experimenter wore every day casual clothes. Obedience decreased to 20% (thee lowest of these variations. Uniforms show legitimacy of authority so we accept that someone with a uniform is entitled to expect obedience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Milgram situational variables: Location

A

Baseline study took place at Yale university. The variation took place in a run-down office block instead. Obedience decreased to 47.5% The university showed legitimacy and authority unlike the run down office block. However obedience was still quite high in the office block because participants perceived the ‘scientific’ nature of the procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the autonomous state?

A

People direct their own actions and they take responsibility for the results of those actions

17
Q

What is the agentic state?

A

Acting as an agent for an authoritative figure and therefore not responsible for personal behaviour. Conformity increases in this state

18
Q

What did Milgram suggest people must be in place to be in the agentic state?

A

The person giving the orders is perceived as being qualified to direct other people’s behavior. That is, they are seen as legitimate. The person being ordered about is able to believe that the authority will accept responsibility for what happens.

19
Q

Hofling (1966) research

A

He wanted to investigate obedience and acting i an agent state in hospitals.

  • Nurses instructed over phone by “Dr smith” to give a drug to a patient exceeding maximum dose which goes against hospital protocal
  • 95% obeyed out of 22 nurses
  • 100% knew it went agaisnt protocal
20
Q

Adorno (1950) dispositional theory

A

The authoritarian personality:

  • Hostile to those of lower status
  • Blind respect for authority
  • Preoccupation with power
21
Q

Elms (1966) evaluation of authoritarian personality

A
  • Follow up on Milgrams study, there were 20 obedient and 20 defiant participants who took the F scale. Obedient participants were more authoritarian than defiant participants
22
Q

What can be concluded from Elms study on authoritarian personalities?

A

Obedient people have more of an authoritarian personality than defiant people due to their upbringing for example harsh parenting

23
Q

Evaluation of F scale

A
  • Obedient participants of original study scored higher on F scale than disobedient ones, supproting the validity of authoritarian personality as an explanation of obedience
  • F scale is open to social desireability bias, so may not be a valid measurement
  • Less educated individuals are more likely to display authoritarian characteristics than well educated ones, so may be levels of education that effect obedience and not authoritarian personality (CONFOUNDING VARIABLE)
24
Q

Legitimacy of authority

A

Societies structured in hierarchical way, people accept authority figures have been allowed to exercise power

  • Consequences of legitimacy of authority is that they have the power to punish people
25
Q
A
26
Q

Destructive authority

A
  • Powerful leaders have been able to use their powers for destructive purposes like ordering people to be cruel
  • Obvious in Milgrams study as experimenter used prods to order participants to behave in ways that wet against their conciences