Property - Water Rights,, Nuisance, Eminent Domain and Zoning Flashcards

1
Q

Quick note on the rule for LATERAL SUPPORT

A

If land is improved by buildings and an adjacent landowner’s excavation causes that improved land to cave in, the excavator will be liable only if NEGLIGENT

Strict liability does not attach to the excavator’s actions unless plaintiff shows that, because of defendant’s actions, plaintiff’s improved lands could have collapsed even in its NATURAL STATE*

(in other words, for strict liability to apply, P must show that the improvements on his land (e.g. the shrubs, the fountain, the structures) did not contribute to his land’s collapse (VERY DIFFICULT STANDARD - strict liability almost never applies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

WATER RIGHTS - 2 major systems

A

(1) Riparian Doctrine

(2) Prior Appropriation Doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Riparian Doctrine

A

The water belongs to those who own the land BORDERING THE WATER COURSE

  • These people are known as “riparians”, who share the right of REASONABLE use of the water
  • THUS one riparian will be liable if his or her use UNREASONABLY interferes with others’ use
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS DOCTRINE

A

The water belongs initially to the state, but the right to divert it and use it can be acquired by an individual, regardless of whether or not he happens to be a riparian owner

RIGHTS are determined by PRIORITY OF BENEFICIAL USE. The norm for allocation is “First in Time, First in Right”

Thus, a person can acquire the right to divert and use water from a watercourse merely by being the first to do so. Any productive or beneficial use of the water, including use for agriculture, is sufficient to create the appropriation right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Rule for GROUNDWATER

A

Groundwater, also known as “percolating water” - ie water beneath the surface of the earth that is not confined to a known channel

The Surface Owner is entitled to make REASONABLE USE OF GROUND WATER

However, the use must NOT be WASTEFUL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rule for Surface Water

A

Common Enemy Rule: - surface water is a nemesis and is therefore considered a common enemy

A landowner may change drainage or make any other changes/improvements on his land to combat the flow of surface water (e.g. change pitch or slope of the land) BUT many courts have modified the common enemy rule to prohibit UNNECESSARY harm to others’ land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Possessor’s Rights

A

A possessor of land has a right to be free from TRESPASSERS and NUISANCE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Trespass

A

Invasion of land by physical object

To remove a trespasser, bring an ejectment action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Private Nuisance

A

Substantial and Unreasonable interference with another’s use and enjoyment of land

NOTE: unlike trespass, nuisance does NOT require tangible physical invasion. Thus ODORS, and NOISE could give rise to a nuisance, but not a trespass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Nuisance and hypersensitive plaintiffs

A

Nuisance is judged under an objective reasonable person standard. Hypersensitive uses of land and hypersensitive plaintiffs will not win a nuisance claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

EMINENT DOMAIN

A

the Government’s 5th amendment power to take private property for PUBLIC USE in exchange for JUST COMPENSATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Types of “takings” under the 5th amendment

A

(1) an Act of govt condemnation - e.g. govt condemns your land to make way for a public highway
(2) Implicit or regulatory taking - a govt regulation that results in depriving your land of all economic value, it is equivalent to a physical appropriation of the land and amounts to the taking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Remedies for a taking under 5th amendment

A

(1) compensate the owner with fair value in hands of the owner
(2) terminate the regulation and pay the owner for damages occurred while it was in effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ZONING

A

Pursuant to its police powers, government may exact statutes to reasonably control land use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Variance

A

principal means to achieve flexibility in zoning

Proponent must show

(1) UNDUE HARDSHIP
(2) that the variance won’t DECREASE neighboring property values

Variance is granted by administrative action, typically a zoning board

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Nonconforming Use

A

A once lawful, existing use now deemed nonconforming by a new zoning ordinance. It cannot be eliminated all at once unless JUST COMPENSATION is paid. Otherwise it would be deemed an UNCONSTUTIONAL TAKING

17
Q

Unconstitutional Exactions

A

Exactions are those amenities government seeks in exchange for granting permission to build.

To be constitutional, exactions being ascked for by the government must BE REASONABLY RELATED, BOTH IN NATURE AND SCOPE TO THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.

e.g. you are a developer seeking permission to build a 200-unit residential development in town of Utopia. The town tells you that it will grant you the requisite permit if you agree to provide several new streetlights, a small park, and wider roads. To pass constitutional scrutiny, these exactions must
BE REASONABLY RELATED, BOTH IN NATURE AND SCOPE TO THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT - this one probably won’t fly. it will be found unconstitutional