Introduction to Human Rights Flashcards

1
Q

What US Constitution contained ‘the first unequivocal, lasting and, above all, judicially enforceable rights document?’

A

the Constitution of the new United States of America (1787)

- Drew on the Declaration of Independence (1776).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is the UDHR legally binding?

A

No - only a resolution of the General Assembly of the UN and as such is not ‘law’.
- But note - argued that it is customary international law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When was the CoE established? And the ECHR?

A

1949 - 1948 (into force 1953).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When did the UK gave individuals the right to lodge ‘complaints’ under the ECHR if they had exhausted all domestic legal remedies?

A

1966

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How many Member States of the CoE?

A
  1. Only European country not a member is Belarus.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the main functions of the CoE (in addition to overseeing the ECHR)?

A
  1. Acting as a political anchor and human rights watchdog for Europe’s post-communist democracies;
  2. Assisting the countries of central and eastern Europe in carrying out and consolidating political, legal, and constitutional reform in parallel with economic reform;
  3. Providing know-how in areas such as human rights, local democracy, education, culture, and the environment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What’s a monist legal system? What system of law is superior?

A

Mon means ‘one’, and these systems treat all forms of law as belonging to a single, binding legal system. That is, they treat international law as binding on their domestic legal systems, without any further enactment at the domestic level.
- International law is superior when there is a clash.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What’s a dualist legal system? Example of country?

A

UK is dualist.
The ‘two’ legal orders as wholly separate. The UK state may be bound by international law, and the UK government may be bound too in terms of its dealings with other states and governments, but the court system of the UK is not bound in the same way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does this mean about when international law can be applicable in the UK? (2)

A
  1. Where the UK itself is a party to proceedings before an international court, to which jurisdiction it has agreed to submit (e.g. the European Court of Human Rights, the International Criminal Court)
  2. Where the UK has incorporated international legal rules into its domestic legal system through an enabling act of Parliament.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does the ECHR have effect in the UK?

A

Incorporated into UK domestic law through the Human Rights Act 1998 (‘HRA’).
Individuals can also petition to the ECtHR.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the three categories of rights under the ECHR?

A

Absolute rights: cannot be lawfully interfered with by the state
Limited rights: can in some circumstances be lawfully interfered with
Qualified rights: can be lawfully interfered with provided certain legal tests are met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What Arts are qualified rights?

A

Articles 8–11 are qualified Convention rights.
The first paragraph of these articles sets out the substantive right(s) guaranteed by the Convention.
Qualified by second paragraph.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What three circumstances need to apply to be able to interfere with qualified rights?

A
  • > The interference was prescribed by, or in accordance with, the law.
  • > The interference was in pursuit of a legitimate aim.
  • > The interference was necessary in a democratic society.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why the HRA in 1998?

A
  1. Followed judgments and recommendations of ECtHR
  2. BUT UK Parliament and UK judiciary never developed laws to match this commitment…
    This and the desire for a more practical and efficient system of rights protection and enforcement highlighted the need.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What rights from ECHR are incorporated by HRA 1998? (11)

A

Article 2: Right to life
Article 3: Freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
Article 4: Freedom from servitude
Article 5: Right to liberty and security
Article 6: Right to a fair trial
Article 7: No punishment without law
Article 8: Right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence
Article 9: Freedom of thought, conscience and religion
Article 10: Freedom of expression and association
Article 12: Right to marry and found a family
Article 14: Prohibition against discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What sections of the HRA allow claimants (victims of Convention rights) to enforce rights in UK domestic courts?

A
Section 3(1): Legislation (whenever passed) should, as far as it is possible to do so, be interpreted in a way which is compatible with Convention rights.
Section 4(2): If a court considers that legislation is incompatible with a Convention right, it may make a declaration of incompatibility.
Section 6(1): Public authorities, including courts and tribunals, are required to act in a way which is compatible with Convention rights.
17
Q

What three categories of Defendant under HRA s 6?

A
  1. Core public authorities (e.g. government departments and local government)
  2. A body or person carrying out functions of a public nature (with the exception of Parliament)
  3. Court or tribunal
18
Q

What’s meant by the “horizontal effect of the HRA”?

A

Courts and tribunals are compelled to act (decide cases) in a way which is compatible with Convention rights, so courts are required to balance the competing Convention rights of individuals.