A Christian Commonwealth I Flashcards
(28 cards)
Who were the two competing entities that preoccupied the medieval concept of Christendom?
The church and the state.
Who had the most influence in how the medieval mind viewed the relationship between church and state?
Augustine of Hippo. He wrote “The City of God”, where he discusses the end goal of God’s people, and the people of the world. He said that temporal powers would benefit from the church.
What city did the western emperor rule out of?
Revena, in northern Italy.
Which city was the capital of the East?
Constantinople.
What were the 5 patriarchies of the empire?
Jerusalem, Alexandria, Antioch, Constatinople and Rome.
What were the two options for how the state and church would partner?
Option 1: The state over the church.
Option 2: The emperor within the church.
What is Ceasaro-Papism?
The emperor is over the church. This was the view taken early on by Eusibius, who said that Constantine was Christ’s annointed.
Eusebius said that there was an ideal Christian emperor. Constantine is Christ’s anointed. He has a crucial role of mediating between the logos and human society. He has a quasi religious role.
The emperor would call councils, not by popes. He sets agendas for that. He sides in theological disputes. The emperor becomes the patron of the church
Why did some argue that the emperor needed to be within the church?
The empire used to persecute Christian. So some believed that the emperor must therefore be within the church like everyone else. There were people who didn’t appreciate emperor meddling in church affairs. We see this in examples from Athanasius of Alexandria and Basil of Caesarea.
Who was the first to establish a tradition of episcopal resistance to the state?
Athanasius. Athanasius fought for homousious, and the divinity of Christ. Most of the church leadership, with the backing of the Arian emperors, did not agree. He was exiled 5 times as a result.
Who was one of the first to argue that, “The Emperor is within the Church, not above it”? And what did he argue?
Ambrose of Milan.
- The church should be autonomous, but protection is provided by the state.
- He rebukes Theodosius after he had killed people in Thessalonica. He kicked him out because of moral failure, and readmitted him after he’d repented publically. That set prescedent.
- “Where matters of faith are concerned it is the custom for bishops to judge Christian emperors, not for Emperors to judge bishops”.
Why was the west vulnerable to barbarian attacks?
Because the political heart of the empire had been moved to Constantinople in the East. It meant that the West was deprived of the political power needed to protect itself.
In the absence of political leadership in the west, who became the authoritative figures?
The Popes of Rome emerge as principle political and cultural figures for Rome and its environs in the West.
What institution gained political power in the west because of the vacuum in political leadership?
The only structure that had survived was the church, and that’s why it gained political power in the vacuum of state leadership.
Why did the barbarians want to destroy Rome? And, what did the city represent to them?
Most barbarians didn’t want to destroy Rome, they wanted to enjoy it. But in assimilating the Roman culture, they did away with what Rome was and Rome because an ideal of something that had previously existed. The city of Rome, to them, represented civilization. And the representative of that was now the Pope.
Name the three reactions to the barbarian invasions and assimilation of people in the West.
And, who were the major proponents of these ideals?
- Spiritual disassociation from the Roman Imperial ideal (Augustine). In his City of God, the empire is just a human city that will eventually fall apart. The City of God does not put much stock in the city of humanity, but participates in it. Christians are in the world, but not of the world. Our citizenship is from above.
- Accomodation and assimilation (Theodoric/Cassiodorus). Families from the ruling class of the Goths married to normal Roman families.
- Reconquest and Reinstitution of Empire (Justinian). The Eastern emperor wanted to re-establish that old empire. But the Lombards came in, and they took over.
Who was the emperor in the East when the West was being sacked by the Goths?
Justinian.
Why was it hard for the Barbarian tribes to fully assimilate the remnants of the Roman people?
Hint: There are three major reasons.
- Gothic tribes were Arian Christians. They weren’t pagans, but they weren’t Orthodox. They couldn’t hold communion with the Romans because they were heretics, and as a result could marry them.
- Invaders kept their own tribal law. Romans had civil courts. Goths had military courts. So, German had their own laws, even in their new Roman home. So everyone had different laws. Man, that sounds horrible.
a. Law ceases to be territorial, and becomes personal.
b. Breakdown in unity of society under the bond of its law. Yup. Sounds like a huge mess. You need to remember that the empire was brought together by law, without it, the empire fell. - An auspicious event: the conversion of the pagan Franks—the Merovingians under Clovis—to Catholic Christianity (ca. 500). They identified with the Roman cause. They began to expand against the Arians. The Franks will have a significant impact on medieval Christianity
What impact did the different concepts of law have in the lands that had been invaded by barbarians?
Invaders kept their own tribal law. Romans had civil courts. Goths had military courts. So, German had their own laws, even in their new Roman home. So everyone had different laws. Man, that sounds horrible.
a. Law ceases to be territorial, and becomes personal.
b. Breakdown in unity of society under the bond of its law. Yup. Sounds like a huge mess. You need to remember that the empire was brought together by law, without it, the empire fell.
Who were the first barbarians to convert to orthodox Christianity?
The Merovingian Franks.
What barbarian leader was the first to convert to orthodox Christianity, and when did this happen?
Clovis converted to Catholic Christianity (ca. 500). The Franks identified with the Roman cause. They began to expand against the Arians. As a result, the Franks will have a significant impact on medieval Christianity.
What physical space did the Franks rule?
Clovis ruled the Kingdom of the Franks. The territory was Gaul, not France. They ruled in Belgium, France and Germany. They south was more Mediterranean, and with amphitheaters, they had temples like Rome. The southern part belonged to Romania, and remained in contact with the Mediterranean world.
What was unique about the way the Franks ruled?
What made them interesting is that the Franks saw themselves as rulers of the Frankish people, not of a location. Gaul was merely the place where they lived. The Franks were more like military chieftains, and less like modern day heads of state.
Government was not really their thing, because they had no interest in it. But they took it over because it served the purpose of ruling the people. For the Merovingians it was just a way of making money for the king.
Why did the bishops become important in Merovingian Gaul?
The bishops, therefore, became important in Merovingian Gaul, because they were Roman, and because they did care about the local people in ways that the Merovingians didn’t. They cared about the territory. The bishop was elected by the people, but was to be confirmed by the king. After that he was not allowed to be moved from his see. The count could be removed, but never the bishop. The bishops would have no problems spending money for their territory. The counts, who represented the Franks, didn’t care about the locals. So you have a situation where by default people were going to prefer the church. And, the bishop could give sanctuary to people, and the counts could not question it because they feared God.
What came out of this marriage between Franks and the Church?
- Feudalism
* Holy Roman Empire