AA Flashcards

1
Q

TP Payment Period

A

TP/Credit purchases * 365

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

inventory Turn over

A

COS/Inventory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Net Asset Turnover

A

Revenue/Capital Employed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Gearing Ratio

A

Net debt/equity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Quick ratio

A

(rec+current inv + cash)/liabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Return on SH Funds

A

Net profit for period/(Share cap+Reserves)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ROCE

A

PBIT/(Equity + net debt)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Business Risk

A

Risk resulting from significant conditions, events, circumstances, actions or inactions that could affect entities ability to achieve objectives and strategies or setting inappropriate objectives or strategies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Inherent Risk

A

Risk faced by client that balance/transaction/disclosure has error that is material either individually or in aggregate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Inherent Risk Factors

A

Complexity,
Subjectivity,
Change.
Uncertainty
Bias/other fraud risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Non-Sampling risk

A

Possibility of coming to wrong conclusion about the FS for non-sampling reasons:
- Not understanding nature
- using invalid techniques or making inappropriate conclusions
- failure to investigate a class of assets/liabilities/transactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Integrity

A

Being straightforward and honest in all professional and business relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Directors responsibilities CA 2006

A

Safeguard Assets
Maintain books and records
Prepare and deliver FS (accounting policies, judgement, compliance, going concern)
Comply with laws and regulations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Auditors Responsibility CA 2006

A

Give an independent opinion on T&F of FS
Give opinion on whether FS prepared in accordance with CA 2006
State in opinion information in SR and DR is consistent with FS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Review of work - features

A

Consider if done in line with audit strategy
Performed in accordance with professional standards, regulation and legal requirements
significant matters raised for further consideration
Appropriate conversations had and conclusions documented and implemented
the need to revise nature, timing and extent
whether work supports conclusions
SAE to support report
Objective of procedures achieved§

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Considerations when tendering

A

Quality of service could provide
knowledge of business
experience of industry
proposed personnel on team
reference obtained
location, size and culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Cold review if failure identified

A

Communicate finding in firm
additional training and professional development
change to policies and procedures
disciplinary actions if repeated failure to comply with firm requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Who completes a Cold review

A

Process - partners review each others work
by team specifically contracted to conduct reviews
By qualified external consultant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Hot review considerations

A

Independence
SR identified and responses
Judgements made
Consultation on issues
Significant corrected/uncorrected misstatements
Matters to be communicated to the client
whether documentation supports conclusion
appropriateness of proposed report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Supervision features ISA 220

A

Progress tracking
consider competence and capabilities
address significant audit matters arising
identify matters for consultation and consideration by more experienced team members during the audit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

ISCQ1 - EP allocate appropriate staff with:

A

Understanding of and practical experience with similar engagements
understanding of relevant professional and legal requirements
knowledge of industry
technical knowledge
ability to apply professional judgement
understanding of QC procedures and policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Engagement Partner & Staff allocations re clients

A

Clients informed of EP identity
EP capable, competent, has authority and time to perform role
Responsibilities EP clearly defined and communicated to the team

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

ISQC 1 - HR

A

Employ and retain appropriate staff
recruitment
performance evaluation
capabilities
competence
development
promotion
compensation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

ISQC 1 - Quality Control System

A

Leadership responsibilities for quality
Ethical requirements
acceptance and continuance HR
Engagement Performance
Monitoring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Quality control procedures
Only suitable clients taken on and retained partners and staff have necessary knowledge and competence ethical guidance communication skills briefing and supervising skills professional skepticism and judgement monitoring
26
Basis for fee disclosed and determined with reference to
Seniority and experience of team time spent risk and responsibility of work nature of business and complexity priority and importance of work expenses incurred
27
Acceptance Considerations
Risk analysis Ethical issues sufficient experience and resources legal requirements regarding appointment and removal are met
28
PC and DC
Duty to maintain professional knowledge and skill and ensure deliver competent professional service act diligently and in accordance with applicable technical professional standards
29
Objectivity
not allow bias conflict of interest undue influence of others to override professional judgement
30
Current Ratio
CA/CL
31
Net margin
PBIT/Revenue
32
Gross profit %
Gross profit/revenue
33
audit risk
risk auditor expresses inappropriate audit opinion when FS are MM = ROMM * DR ROMM = IR*CR
34
Detection RIsk
Risk procedures do not detect misstatement that exists and could be material alone or in aggregate
35
Sampling risk
Risk that conclusions drawn from a sample are different than if had looked at entire population
36
Confidentiality
Respect confidentiality of information acquired and do not disclose to third parties without proper authority and do not use for personal gain
37
Professional behaviour
comply with relevant laws and regulations and avoid action that discredits professiong
38
audit threshold
2/3 employees < 50 Rev < 10.2m Gross Assets <5.1m
39
Interest Cover
PBI / Interest
40
Operating Cost %
Operating Cost / revenue
41
COS %
COS / Revenue
42
Control Risk
Risk that a misstatement could occur material alone or in aggregate and will not be prevented or detected and corrected
43
Significant risk
ROMM - either Auditor judges IR close to upper end of spectrum (likelihood or impact) Required to tread as SR by ISA
44
Materiality RAP
Revenue 0.5-1% Assets 1-2% PBT 5-10%
45
TR collection Period
TR/Rev * 365
46
Threats MASSIF Co
Management Advocacy Self Interest Self review Intimidation Familiarity Conflict of interest
47
Consequences of issuing wrong opinion
Want to avoid litigation Reputational damage Pay damages Lose clients
48
Liability Limitation
Become LLP Agree liability cap – max amount – fair reasonable and approved by SH Proportional liability agreement apportioning blame between guilty partners Bannerman paragraph – report for company members only and no other party (liability disclaimer) Have to do: - Get PI insurance - Clarify responsibilities in audit report and engagement letter Reduce liability – less likely to get sued as reduces expectation gap Could also do a good job – less likely to get sued
49
Consideration during tender/acceptance - TRIM ROT
T – technical competence – do we have relevant skills to do the work, review who have in firm, do they have right skills, do they need training, do we need an expert R – resources I – Independence – safeguards – ethical threats M – Money laundering – any indicators of dodgy transactions – client ID checks R- reference O – outgoing auditor T – term of engagement – signed engagement letter prior to starting work
50
Process for contacting outgoing auditors
1. Explain to client have duty to contact outgoing auditors 2. Obtain client permission to contact 3. If not given – don’t accept – could suggest there are issues 4. Send letter to outgoing auditors 5. Replies mentoring anything untoward 6. No reply chase 7. No reply still inform them take silence of evidence no issues and intend to perofrm audit
51
Benefits of assurance
- Enhance credibility of information reported on - Reduce risk of management bias error or even fraud in the inof being reported on - Draws users attention to deficiencies in the information being reported on - Credibility to wider share market Ensure high quality, reliable information is circulating in the market Give investors added faith in the market Improve reputation of organisation trading in the market - Business scrutinised by another set of professional eyes - Assurance to third parties (e.g. Tax) that FS are reliable - Growing business will one day need an audit - May recommend improvements to systems
52
Disadvantages of assurance (entity pov)
- Cost - Staff time - Disruption to business - Time spent on initial appointment - Dealing with confidentiality - Expectations gap especially re fraud detection - Inherent limitations of audit
53
ISA 500 procedures (ROADIE)
Recalc/reperform Observe Analytical procedures Documentation inspect Inspect assets External communication Enquiry
54
ISRE 2400 Procedures
Inquiry (accounting principals, systems material assertions) Analytical procedures
55
ISAE 3400
- Assess assumptions - Re-computation - Written representation
56
Assurance Engagement
one which a practitioner expresses a conclusion designed to enhance the degree of confidence of the intended users other than the responsible party about the outcome of the evaluation or measurement of subject matter against criteria
57
Auditor rights under CA 2006
- Access at all time to books and accounts - Right to obtain any information necessary for the audit from any officer or employee of the company - Right to attend any general meeting of the company
58
Completion Tasks
On FS - Analytical Procedures & CA 2006 checklist On working Papers - Check SAE, Compare audit plan with working papers/procedures performed, Ensure procedures performed correctly, Ensure issues are resolved/explained
59
Communication - ISA 260 v 265
260 – general communication – guidance for communicating anything - Significant audit matters/ matters that have come to your attention 265- specifically for control deficiencies – for management report
60
Matters reported by exception - RAPID
Returns from branches not visited have been received and are adequate Accounts agree to underlying records Proper accounting records have been maintained Information and explanation shave been received Directors transactions have all been correctly disclosed and loans or transactions with tehm have been disclosed correctly
61
Duties re SR and DR
Read other info (inc dr and sr) and if inconsistencies seek to resolve state in report if consistent and prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements If inconsistent, explain inconsistencies in 'Opinions on other matters prescribed by CA2006' If not prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements 'Matters we are required to report on by exception'
62
Reasonable v limited assurance
Level Reasonable = positive - highest level of assurance not absolute, auditor satisfied subject matter conforms in all material respects with criteria. Accounts give a T&F view Limited - Negative - limited assurance, given negatively
63
Why are reasonable and limited assurance engagements different
- Level of work undertaken - Amount of evidence - Procedures performed
64
Off shelf IT package threats/responses
self review & management If used for accounting system/FS prep refuse engagement as prohibited - if not can accept with safeguards
65
Recruitment & remuneration services threats and response
Familiarity and Management Not allowed to provide recruitment services for directors and no remuneration advice deline
66
Importance of attending an inventory count
SAE on quantity Evidence of existence Observe to ensure adherence Test calculations for accuracy ROMM if wrong If don't adhere reperform/report on deficiencies
67
Overdue fees threats
Self interest threat due to independence if offer unmodified opinion may feel more likley to collect fees Ideally arrange settlement of overdue fees Consider resigning if not settled If do not resign need safeguards (second review and ethics partner)
68
Auditing Competitors consideration
Confidentiality & Conflict of interest hard to act in best interest of both clients staff need to be aware of issues, cerity they are aware of proceeders, obtain informed consent of and inform both client, different partner and teams, independent review of arrangements information barriers in place
69
Auditor responsibilities re fraud
Not responsible for preventing Responsible to detect MM in FS whether due to fraud/error Design audit procedures to obtain reasonable assurance FS as a whole are free from MM whether due to fraud or error If discover - ML discovery requirements report them Do not tip off the client
70
Management responsibility re fraud
Responsible to prevent and detect Implement IC suitable for business and monitor them Responsible for safeguarding assets
71
Why should external auditors be objective and independent
FS preparation is subjective, auditor must be unbiased in forming opinion as directors judgement may be biased or inappropriate opinion should only be based on available evidence Independence increases likelihood auditor is objective Lack of independence may decrease public confidence in audit work, reducing credibility and reliability of reports Required by CA 2006
72
Procedures for allowances/estimates
Enquire - reason for estimate & method for calculation Inspect - evidence of why need allowance and calculation performed Recalculate using management method & logic and auditors method and logic Use a third party expert
73
Auditor Appointment - PLC
Done at AGM where resolution is passed by >50% of shareholders, if no auditor appointed Secretary of State will appoint
74
Auditor appointment - private company
No AGM required, auditor is automatically reappointed unless 5% or more SH register notice to change auditors resolution of 50%+ shareholders to pass required
75
Removal of auditor
Anytime if SH pass ordinary resolution Auditor given notice Auditor must deposit statement of circumstances at registered office of company explaining removal (not listed 'there are no circumstances) Return all books and records maintain confidentiality Company responsible to inform companies house
76
Auditor resignation requirements
Prepare resignation letter Contact Auditors authority Deposit statement of circumstances at companies registered office explaining removal return all books and records maintain confidentiality Cooperate with incoming auditors
77
Data Analytics BRAVE
Breakdown - analyse by product line Reperform - three way matching Aged analysis Variance Analysis Exception Report + test 100%
78
Benefits of Data Analytics
Enhances quality of work and understanding of entity Perform work more efficiently, staff can focus on risky areas Test up to 100% of transactions timing of engagement can be changed (more work in same period) Facilitates analysis of relationships Identify outlying transactions Facilitates items at risk of misstatement/ fraud
79
SFP Assertions (CRAVE)
Completeness Rights and Obligations Accuracy / Allocation Valuation Existence P&D
80
PL Assertions COCOA
Completeness Occurrence Classification (cut)-Off Accuracy P&D
81
When relying on someone else's work STRIP
Scope - in accordance with IFRS ? Inspect engagement letter to confirm measurement base Technical Competence - review qualifications/training Resources - inspect report to determine if work is appropriate and detailed Independence - obtain list of SH and confirm expert independent Professionalism - Is the expert taken seriously? review board minutes and identify actions implemented
82
Matters to be communicated to component auditor ISA 600
Timetable and dates of planned visits Work to be performed Ethical requirements Component Materiality List of Related Parties/work on intragroup transactions Significant Risks Timely communication
83
Matters to be communicated by component to group ISA 600
Confirm compliance and understanding of instructions and cooperation with group auditor Confirm allow group auditor to be involved in work Allow group auditor to evaluate and use work Understand Ethical Requirements Understand ISA
84
Audit Completion Summary
Overall Financial Statement Review Summary of unadjusted misstatements (ISA 450) Opening balances (ISA 510) Comparatives (ISA 710) Going Concern - ISA 570 Subsequent Events - ISA 560 Written representations - ISA 580 Communicate deficiencies in internal Control ISA 265 Other parts of annual report - ISA 720
85
Auditors Report 12 points
Opinion Basis of Opinion Conc re GC Approach of audit - KAM Application of Materiality Other info (materially consistent) Opinions on other matters prescribed by ca Matters on which we are required to report on my exception Directors responsibilities Auditors Responsibilities Other Matters Signature
86
Benefit of assurance CHRIS D
Credibility (Subj and wider investment) Help business (get loan) Reputation Investors confidence in market Subsequent audit easier Deficiencies identified
87
Why Group auditor evaluates evidence obtained by component auditor
Required by ISA 600 Group auditor responsible for audit opinion on Group FS Reduces risk of Material misstatement in group FS/Inappropriate opinion Determine whether work undertaken supports firms opinion, additional procedures are required
88
How group auditor evaluates evidence obtained by component
Questionnaires Review working papers Inspect summary of conclusions Evaluate uncorrected misstatements
89
Implications for auditors report if no written representations obtained
- Auditor cannot obtain SAE/ There is a limitation on scope - Written representations are required by ISA 580 - Matter is pervasive - Modified Opinion issued - Disclaimer of opinion - Basis for disclaimer of opinion paragraph explaining the matter after opening section - Report by exception – not received all information / explanations / inadequate accounting records
90
Purpose of cold review
Continuing part of quality control procedures to assess effectiveness of procedures and compliance with ISA, Ethical Standards, Legal requirements and audit regulation - Assess if appropriate report was issued - Identify where changes to procedures or additional training are needed - Prevent problems in future audits - Minimise damage to the firm
91
Government / regulator response to audit criticism
- Kingman review – review of role of FRC - CMA review – review of audit market – proposed joint audits - Brydon review – review existing model for auditing/reduce expectation gap - BEIS report – future of audit, break up big 4 separate Audit / non-audit - FRC increasing number of reviews
92
Communicating internal control deficiencies (ISA 265)
- Timely to allow management to act promptly - Clear language to avoid misunderstanding - Communicated to those in authority who can take corrective action - Include description of deficiency, consequences and recommendation to ensure sufficient information - Form and frequency should be appropriate to size and nature of organisation points should be sufficiently important and useful - Management comments should be included to indicate if accepted and aid understanding of TCWG - Disclaimer included to reduce likelihood third party reliance stating purpose of audit is to express opinion on FS, no opinion is expressed on effectiveness of IC and matters reported are only those identified during audit
93
Purpose of quality control measures
Ensure engagements carried out in manner that: - Meet users’ expectations/provide reliable service - Work is performed to high standard/provides VFM is efficient and cost effective - Requirement of inspection units/auditing standards satisfied - Enhance reputation/increase confidence in the profession Protect against - Negligence Claims - Disciplinary procedures Ensure firm only accepts engagements that it has necessary competencies for
94
Types of business risk
Operational, financial and compliance
95
Benefits of planning
- To ensure the audit is carried out in an efficient (do quickly) and effective (right opinion) manner - Objectives – devote appropriate attention to important areas, - identify and resolve potential problems, - complete work quickly and effectively, - proper assignment of work to staff - Facilitate direction/supervision and review of work - Coordinate work done by experts/other auditors
96
What goes in audit strategy (BS SMART)
Business Information Systems Information Staffing Materiality Analytical procedures Risk Timing
97
Audit Strategy
always comes first, is a framework, provides an overview of the audit, overall direction
98
Audit Plan
Comes second Converts the audit strategy into an audit plan Detailed List of procedures Nature timing and extent of procedures
99
Nature timing & extent
Nature – type of procedure Timing – when are you going to do the procedure – data used – when Extent – amount of procedure – depends on the level of risk
100
Material by nature
Related parties Directors Emoluments
101
Materiality is...
an expression of significance
102
Types of Materiality
Performance Materiality (substantive testing - create sample, identify material errors) - different % for different accounts Overall / Planning materiality - identify significant accounts/risk areas - audit risk - detection Completion Materiality - used in evaluating misstatements
103
When are analytical procedures used
Planning - mandatory (ISA 315) - comparison ratio analysis trend in total Completion - mandatory - just usually ratios and comparison ISA 520 can use as substantive procedure - SAP - proof in total and trend analysis and unusual item review
104
Why UTB so important
- Use risk based approach to audit (identify and focus on risk areas) to do so need to do a risk assessment and identify risky areas, to be effective, need to understand the business. - Compliance with ISA / professional standards - avoids risk
105
How Understand the Entity?
- External (to the auditor and client) o Credit searches, industry info HMRC and companies house - In house (auditor) o Acceptance records, previous files and staff - Client o Discussion with staff, review board minutes and correspondence, inspection of forecast and internal audit reports
106
Overall responses to risk
Apply professional scepticism Consider using more and/or more experienced auditors including use of experts, internal audit and other auditors Provide more supervision incorporate more unpredictability into procedures Perform more testing
107
What consider before testing estimates
- Estimation uncertainty - Complexity - Subjectivity - Other inherent risk factors
108
Procedures for auditing estimates
Enquire with management the reason for the estimate & the method of the estimate Inspect evidence for the reason of the estimate and the method and compare Recalculate based on management logic (above) and auditor logic and compare May need to use an expert - to test estimate and calculate
109
CAATs
1. Test data - test of control (use data to test IC - payroll) 2. Audit Software - substantive procedure - routine transaction - programme (ticking and bashing) 3. Audit Data Analytics - inflow - identify risk areas - don't have to programme - can be used TOC and SP
110
When use internal audit?
Understand entity and information on internal controls Perform tests of control Do substantive procedures
111
What do on IA work before using?
Perform walkthrough test of system to confirm system works as expected When do TOC - reperform a sample and try to replicate results Substantive - reperform sample - can't mention in report and important that SP are performed correctly so don't get wrong opinion
112
What to do to IA before using them?
Audit them - competence, capabilities, objectivity
113
Procedures on expert work:
read work results (do you understand and areas to query) Ask queries (didn't understand / check they did the work) Use another expert (to audit their work or re perform)
114
Matters to consider on expert work
Data Method Logic Conclusion Results
115
EQCR attributes
technically competent experienced in client industry & listed companies independent of engagement team and client respected individual with authority to undertake the role
116
Role of EQCR
ensure professional standards and legal and regulatory requirements have been met by: Discussing sig matters with EP Review selected documentation, FS proposed report Review judgements especially materiality and SR Evaluate conclusions Evaluate independence consider whether appropriate consultation undertaken on contentious matters, significance of uncorrected misstatement, matters to be communicated to TCWG
117
EQCR purpose
To reduce the level of engagement risk on audits of listed entities and for other audits where the firm has determined a review is required, for example, engagements where risk is assessed as high
118
Role of the ethics partner in external audit firm
Responsible for adequate policies and procedures regarding integrity, objectivity and independence, firms compliance with FRC ethical standard, effectiveness of communication on ethical matters to partners and staff Provide ethical guidance and advice to individual partners and teams Considers whether policies and procedures are properly covered during training Provides guidance where difficult and objective judgement needs to be made or a consistent position reached Assess breaches of FRC ethical standard Determines whether safeguards can be put in place or need to resign
119
Responsibilities as outgoing auditor
obtain authority to discuss with new auditor, answer request promptly and record discussion with new auditor in writing, confirm matters they ought to be aware of and explain meaningfully (honestly and unambiguously) include description of differences of opinion if not given permission report that fact
120
When can auditor disclose confidential information
- Required by law – legal proceedings, suspect terrorist activities, suspected ML to NCA, suspected bribery - Permitted by Law - Professional right/duty to disclose not prohibited by law – comply with quality review by regulator, respond to enquiry/investigation by regulator, to protect professional interest in legal proceedings, comply with technical standards/ethical requirements