AC3.2 : Effectiveness Of Criminological Theories To Explain The Causes Of Criminality Flashcards
(23 cards)
Positives Of Bandura’s Social Learning Theory (individualistic)
- Bobo doll experiment showed the model had an effect on the child’s behaviour. Therefore showing cause and effect.
- The experiment and variables, such as gender and actions of the model, were controlled, thus allowing greater accuracy
- The study has been replicated with slight changes and similar results have been found.
Negatives of Banduras social learning theory. (individualistic)
- The bobo doll experiment is a laboratory study of imitation, which has low ecological validity.
- The experiment involves ethical issues due to exposing the children to aggression.
- There was a novelty aspect of the doll for children who had never played with it before, meaning they were more likely to copy the adult.
Positives of Freud’s theory. (individualistic)
- Just because Freud’s theories are rather odd or unusual it doesn’t make them automatically wrong.
- Psychodynamic theories have contributed to research about crime and behaviour.
- The Id, ego and superego relate to different parts of the brain, and their functions and development.
Negatives of Freud’s theory (individualistic)
- Psychodynamic theories of offending are no longer accredited by psychologists due to the difficulty of testing concepts such as the unconscious mind.
- Unscientific and lack objective interpretation. It is also a very subjective process.
- Lack of quantitative data from Freud’s case studies. He knew his patients and therefore couldn’t be subjective.
Positives of Eysenck’s personality types(individualistic)
- Eysenck’s research on soldiers in hospital supported this theory. He predicted the most traumatised soldiers would score high on neurotic.
- If this theory is correct and tendencies towards criminal behaviour are detectable in childhood, then it may be possible to intervene at an early stage and prevent such development.
- His personality testing has formed the basis of many modern personality
Positives of Lombroso(biological)
- Lombroso was the first person to give criminology scientific criminology.
- Charles Goring did find a low-order intelligence in convicts which suggests some genetic base to criminality.
- Several pieces of research that suggests that less attractive individuals are more likely to be guilty.
- Lombroso did challenge the idea that criminals are evil or that they choose to be evil or that they choose to be criminal.
- Lombroso labelled prisons “criminal universities” and suggested prisoners came out much worse than when they went in. Given todays recidivism rate this is perceptive.
- His work heralded the beginnings of offender profiling.
Negatives of Lombroso (biological)
- Lack of a control group
- Lack of accuracy due to possible disfigurements.
- Not everyone with atavistic features are criminals and not every criminal has atavistic features.
- Charles Goring used a non criminal control group and found no significant differences in terms of behaviour.
- Scientific racism because many of the features are specific to those of African descent.
- Extremely deterministic and assumes we cannot escape destiny.
Positives of Sheldon (biological)
- A number of studies have confirmed that there is a small association between body build and criminality.
- A good sized sample was used and Sheldon had control groups of non offenders to refer to.
- Even though there could be issues surrounding the reliability of Sheldon’s study, other researchers have found results that seem to support, at least in part, his initial theory.
- Found that some criminal groups were more mesomorphic.
Negatives of Sheldon (biological)
- He couldn’t explain how ectomorphs and endomorphs could also be criminals.
- Did not take into account that peoples body types change throughout their lives.
- Consider if mesomorphs get picked upon or invited to do illegal acts.
- If mesomorphs shape is considered criminal then do courts think this too? The judicial system may treat them too harshly.P
Positives of XYY(biological)
- One study by Jacob found that a significant number of men in prison had XYY sex chromosomes instead of XY.
- Adler indicated that it is possible that aggressive and violent behaviours are at least partly determined by genetic factors.
Negatives of XYY(biological)
- Studies have found that genetic abnormalities are widespread throughout the general population and therefor do not explain aggression.
- Focusing too heavily on genetics ignores the behaviorist approach.
- Theilgaard researched the traits of XYY men compared to XY men. He found the characteristics of aggression was not associated with the XYY men.
Positives of Twin studies(biological)
- Such studies are natural experiments, as the biological relationships between the twins is a naturally occurring variable.
- Christiansen supports the view that criminality does not have a genetic component.
- The results of twin studies have helped the prevention of vulnerable disorders.
Negatives of Twin studies(biological)
- Early twin studies, such as Lange were inadequately controlled and lacked validity as to whether the twins were DZ or MZ, which was based on appearance rather than DNA.
- The small sample involved in twin studies may not be representative of the general population.
- If twins are brought up in the same environment, criminality could just as easily be related to nurture as to genetics.
Positives of adoption studies(biological)
- As adopted children are exposed to a different environment, it is easier to separate genetic and environmental factors.
- Studies have concluded that there is a correlation between adopted children and their biological parents.
Negatives of Adoption studies(biological)
- The age of adoption may mean the adopted children have already been influenced by either their natural parents or their foster environment.
- Info about bio family isn’t always available.
- The Adoption process is not always random, as often children are placed with parents similar to thier biological families.
Positives of Marxism (sociological)
- Does provide an explanation for crime that covers all social classes and a variety of offences.
- Highlights the impact of selective law enforcement and how white-collar crime is under-policed.
- Demonstrates how the law reflects differences in power between the social classes. Also, how inequality in society can lead to criminal behaviour.
Negatives of Marxism (sociological)
- Largely ignores other class inequalities such as gender or ethnicity.
- Overstates the amount of crime in working class communities.
- Many prosecutions of wc crime.
Positives of The labelling theory (sociological)
- Shows how the law is often enforced in a discriminatory way. Highlights the consequences of labelling.
- Highlights the weakness in official stats which allow bias in law enforcement.
- Highlights the role of the media on defining and creating deviance and for producing moral panics.
Negatives of the labelling theory (sociological)
- Fails to explain why deviant behaviour happens in the first place.
- Ignores the victim of the crime and focuses on the criminal. There is a potential to romanticise crime.
- Criminals do not need a label to know they are doing wrong. Plus, labelling does not always lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Positives of Right realism (sociological)
- Has helped produce and shape the government’s research into crime.
- Offers a more practical approach to tackling crime than its mainly theoretical predecessors such as Marxism or labelling.
- Research by Flood-Page supports the view of the decline of the family. They found children, particularly males, from one lone parent backgrounds and step-families were more likely to offend than those who lived with two natural parents.
Negatives of right realism (sociological)
- Too readily accepts crime statistics.
- Ignores wider structural causes of crime.
- Ignores the increasing gap between the rich and the poor which creates resentment (relative deprivation).
Positives of left realism (sociological)
- Explores the role of the victim of crime, especially the poor or vulnerable in much more depth than any other criminological theory.
- Recognises multiple causes of crime.
- Left realism avoids the worst excesses of both right and left wing approaches by neither glorifying or attacking the police.
Negatives of left realism (sociological)
- Doesn’t explain why everyone in relative deprivation turns to crime
- Arguably made up a mix of other theories pulled together
- Fails to explain white collar crimes