Acceptance Flashcards

(22 cards)

1
Q

What is Chen-Wishart’s definition of acceptance?

A

“An acceptance is an unequivocal expression of consent to the proposal contained in the offer and has the effect of immediately binding both parties to the contract.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 4 criteria for a valid acceptance?

A
  • The acceptance must mirror the offer
  • must be made in response to the offer (a nexus between acceptance and offer)
  • must be made by an appropriate method
  • must be communicated to the offeror
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What will a counter-offer do?
- case

A

terminate the original offer

Hyde v Wrench [1840]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does not amount to a counter-offer?
- case

A

An inquiry for more information

Stevenson, Jaques, & Co v McLean [1850]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a nexus?

A

connection between the parties to a contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What must the acceptance respond to?

A

a known offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Does a cross-offer create a contract?
- case

A

No

Tinn v Hoffman [1873]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Will you always get a reward if it is offered?
- case

A

If there is a reward on offer, but you complete the act without intending to get the reward, you don’t get the reward

R v Clarke [1927]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Is there a general prescribed method of acceptance?

A
  • No
  • an objective manifestation of intent to accept is required
  • e.g. signature or reliance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can an offeror enforce a prescribed method of acceptance?
- case

A

Yes

Manchester Diocesan Council for Education v Commercial and General Investments Ltd [1970]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Can an acceptance be inferred from silence?
- case

A

No

Felthouse v Bindley [1862]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is a contract formed when the acceptance is sent or received?
- 2 cases

A
  • generally: received

  • Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandels GmbH [1983]
  • Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp [1955]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is a withdrawal notice effective when it is received or when it is read?
- case

A

When it is received

Tenax Steamship Co v Owners of the Motor Vessel Brimnes (The Brimnes) [1975]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the postal rule?
- 2 cases

A

for post, acceptance occurs when it is sent, not received

  • Adams v Lindsell (1818)
  • Household Fire Insurance v Grant (1879)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When does the postal rule not apply?
- 2 cases → 2 situations

A
  • when it is explicitly excluded -> Holwell Securities Ltd v Hughes [1974]
  • revocation -> Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a unilateral contract?

A

the exchange of a promise for an act

17
Q

What are the rules for acceptance?

A
  • only accepted when you perform the stipulated act / performance
  • acceptance doesn’t require communication of acceptance
18
Q

When can you no longer revoke?
- case

A

Once performance has commenced

Errington v Errington [1952]

19
Q

When is revocation applicable?
- case

A

whenever it is received

Tenax Steamship Co v Owners of the Motor Vessel Brimnes (The Brimnes) [1975]

20
Q

When does an implied duty not apply?
- case

A

if the offeree should bear risk

Luxor (Eastborne) Ltd v Cooper [1941]

21
Q

What is the best method for a revocation?
- case

A

through similar methods to how you offered / accepted

Shuey v US (1875)

22
Q

Can any other party revoke?
- case

A

a reliable 3rd party

Dickinson v Dodds (1876)