Acculturation and Globalization Flashcards
(34 cards)
acculturation
- Consequences of people from different cultural groups being in continuous first-hand contact → change occurs in one or both groups
- Not just about the non-dominant group adjusting to the dominant groups → bi-directional relationship
- Can occur at group-level or individual-level
group-level acculturation
- 3 possible outcomes:
- destructive
- reactive
- creative
- none of these outcomes are inherently positive or negative
group-level acculturation: destructive outcomes
- Loss of culture through absorption or elimination due to continuous contact with another cultural group
- Ex. Indian Residential School System (negative outcome); loss of dangerous/painful cultural practices like foot binding (positive outcome)
group-level acculturation: reactive outcomes
- Groups re-establish their original cultures by revitalizing or reaffirming them
- Ex. language schools (ie. Chinese school), language revitalization efforts (ie. Squamish immersion house)
group-level outcomes: creative outcomes
- New cultures or cultural information emerge through interactions between the original cultures
- Ex. fusion food, religion (different practices across the world)
individual-level acculturation
- Acculturation takes on multiple strategies that reflect how people reconcile norms and values of:
- Culture of origin
- Culture of dominant society
- Acculturation strategies:
- unidimensional model (mutual exclusion model)
- 2-dimensional model
individual-level acculturation: unidimensional model
- Assimilation: adopting mainstream culture and rejecting heritage culture
- Separation: rejecting mainstream culture and retaining heritage culture
- Both of these strategies assume that adoption of dominant norms and values is inversely related to retention of original norms and values
individual-level acculturation: 2-dimensional model
- Mainstream identification can be high or low
- Heritage identification can be high or low
- Leads to 4 acculturation styles:
- Integration, assimilation, separation, marginalization
2-dimensional model: integration
- Strongly identifies with both mainstream and heritage culture; positive feelings towards both
- Participate in host culture but maintain traditions of heritage culture
- Most successful strategy (more social support - social networks in both cultures)
2-dimensional model: assimilation
- Strongly identifies with mainstream culture, but not with heritage culture; positive feelings towards mainstream, negative feelings towards heritage
- Participate in host culture and leave behind traditions of heritage culture
2-dimensional model: separation
- Strongly identifies with heritage culture, not with mainstream culture; positive feelings towards heritage, negative towards mainstream
- Ignore host culture and maintain traditions of heritage culture
2-dimensional model: marginalization
- No identification with either culture; negative feelings towards both
- Least common strategy
predictors of acculturation strategies
- High prejudice from host culture → high levels of separation
- Migrant’s lower socioeconomic status → high levels of marginalization or separation (financially “locked out” of host culture)
- Host valuing cultural diversity and multiculturalism → higher integration or assimilation
impacts of acculturation strategies
Even second and third generation Muslim Europeans have engaged in extremist radicalization → prejudice against Muslim migrants accounts for significant component of radicalization process
global orientation
- Individual differences in receptiveness to cultural globalization
- Can be affective, cognitive, and behavioural
- 2 types of responses: proactive responses and defensive responses
global orientation: proactive responses
- receptive to acquiring new cultures
- Appreciating cultural diversity (affective)
- Having diverse knowledge of other cultural groups (cognitive)
- Learning the languages and norms of other cultural groups and making social contact with cultural others (behavioural)
- Associated with promotion orientation: motivation to try to achieve and approach positive outcomes (ie. learning new things, having new experiences)
- Tend to have higher levels of cross-cultural efficacy: more confidence in one’s ability to engage in cross-cultural interactions
global orientation: defensive responses
- focus in on affirming one’s ethnic culture
- Feeling uneasy about cultural interactions (affective)
- Believing in superiority of one’s own cultural group (cognitive)
- Insisting on sticking to norms of ethnic culture and doesn’t try to make social contact with cultural others (behavioural)
- Associated with prevention orientation: motivation to try to avoid losses and other negative outcomes (ie. avoiding potential undesirable consequences of globalization such as losing an aspect of your culture)
- Tend to have lower levels of cross-cultural efficacy: less confidence in one’s ability to engage in cross-cultural interactions
impacts of proactive responses
- For those from mainstream culture:
- Fosters more tolerance for other cultural groups
- Predicts more frequent, pleasant intercultural contact
- Migrants have better acculturation outcomes (psychological well-being and cultural competence), and perceive less discrimination
impacts of defensive responses
- For those from mainstream culture:
- Higher levels of separation and marginalization from cultural minority
- Migrants have greater acculturative stress
ways globalization impacts us
- self-identity
- quality of life
- mental health
- interpersonal/intergroup relationships
- environment
ways globalization impacts us: self-identity
- Traditional theories of the self focus on traditional characteristics of individuals (ie. personality traits, individual characteristics)
- Also includes characteristics of cultures as embodied by individuals (ie. independence vs. interdependence, holistic vs. analytic thinking)
- What’s needed: greater focus on individual differences within contexts (cultural fit)
- influences third culture kids
cultural fit
cultural context emphasizes same characteristics that a person has → we can best adjust to a new environment if our characteristics match what that cultural context emphasizes (ex. An extrovert will do a lot better in a culture that emphasizes extroversion)
third-culture kids
- First culture: heritage culture; second culture: heritage culture + another culture; third culture: a whole new cultural perspective
- Lack a rooted sense of belonging in a particular country → feel like outsiders
- Feel like they can adjust everywhere, but don’t belong anywhere
- Belong more strongly to relationships and as citizens of the world than to countries
- More chameleon-like in interactions → changing, fluid identities
- Hard to find people who understand their experience or can affirm their identity
- Identity not fixed or permanent - highly fluid and adaptive
- Some suggest high levels of marginalization as an acculturation strategy
ways globalization impacts us: quality of life
- Deterritorialization of information: information is no longer segmented by territory
- Engagement in global and local networks of information
- Sense of subjective overload → difficult to manage the amount of info that’s easily accessible
- The absent-present phenomenon: physically present, but psychologically disengaged in a virtual realm